Updating visual–spatial working memory during object movement

Working memory enables temporary maintenance and manipulation of information for immediate access by cognitive processes. The present study investigates how spatial information stored in working memory is updated during object movement. Participants had to remember a particular location on an object which, after a retention interval, started to move. The question was whether the memorized location was updated with the movement of the object or whether after object movement it remained represented in retinotopic coordinates. We used saccade trajectories to examine how memorized locations were represented. The results showed that immediately after the object stopped moving, there was both a retinotopic and an object-centered representation. However, 200ms later, the activity at the retinotopic location decayed, making the memory representation fully object-centered. Our results suggest that memorized locations are updated from retinotopic to object-centered coordinates during, or shortly after object movement.

[1]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  OpenSesame: An open-source, graphical experiment builder for the social sciences , 2011, Behavior Research Methods.

[2]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Predictive remapping of attention across eye movements , 2011, Nature Neuroscience.

[3]  S. Tipper,et al.  Short Report: Object-Centred Inhibition of Return of Visual Attention , 1991, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[4]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  Retinotopic memory is more precise than spatiotopic memory , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  Carl R Olson,et al.  Brain representation of object-centered space , 1996, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[6]  M. Goldberg,et al.  Spatial processing in the monkey frontal eye field. I. Predictive visual responses. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Orienting of attention and eye movements , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[8]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  The relationship between inhibition of return and saccade trajectory deviations. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  S. Tipper,et al.  Selection of moving and static objects for the control of spatially directed action. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  Julie D. Golomb,et al.  The Native Coordinate System of Spatial Attention Is Retinotopic , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[11]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  Exogenous object-centered attention , 2013, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

[12]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  Gradual Remapping Results in Early Retinotopic and Late Spatiotopic Inhibition of Return , 2010, Psychological science.

[13]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  Programming of endogenous and exogenous saccades: evidence for a competitive integration model. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  Julie D. Golomb,et al.  Attention doesn’t slide: spatiotopic updating after eye movements instantiates a new, discrete attentional locus , 2011, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[15]  Michael H. Herzog,et al.  Nonretinotopic Exogenous Attention , 2011, Current Biology.

[16]  S. Tipper,et al.  Object-centered not scene-based visual neglect. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Spatial attention and eye movements , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[18]  M. Goldberg,et al.  Neurons in the monkey superior colliculus predict the visual result of impending saccadic eye movements. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  S. Tipper,et al.  Object-based and environment-based inhibition of return of visual attention. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  Carl R Olson,et al.  Object-based vision and attention in primates , 2001, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[21]  J R Duhamel,et al.  The updating of the representation of visual space in parietal cortex by intended eye movements. , 1992, Science.

[22]  Julie D. Golomb,et al.  Attentional Facilitation throughout Human Visual Cortex Lingers in Retinotopic Coordinates after Eye Movements , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[23]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  Eye movement trajectories and what they tell us , 2006, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[24]  Carl R Olson,et al.  Brain representation of object-centered space in monkeys and humans. , 2003, Annual review of neuroscience.

[25]  R. Wurtz,et al.  Visual Perception and Corollary Discharge , 2008, Perception.

[26]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  Selection within visual memory representations activates the oculomotor system , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[27]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  No functional role of attention-based rehearsal in maintenance of spatial working memory representations. , 2009, Acta psychologica.

[28]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  Remembering a Location Makes the Eyes Curve Away , 2005, Psychological science.

[29]  E. Vogel,et al.  Interactions between attention and working memory , 2006, Neuroscience.

[30]  R. Walker,et al.  Curved saccade trajectories: Voluntary and reflexive saccades curve away from irrelevant distractors , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[31]  Umberto Castiello,et al.  Object-centred orienting of attention , 1995 .

[32]  M. Masson,et al.  Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[33]  Carl R Olson,et al.  Neurons with object-centered spatial selectivity in macaque SEF: do they represent locations or rules? , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.