Memory for Syntax Despite Amnesia

Syntactic persistence is a tendency for speakers to reproduce sentence structures independently of accompanying meanings, words, or sounds. The memory mechanisms behind syntactic persistence are not fully understood. Although some properties of syntactic persistence suggest a role for procedural memory, current evidence suggests that procedural memory (unlike declarative memory) does not maintain the abstract, relational features that are inherent to syntactic structures. In a study evaluating the contribution of procedural memory to syntactic persistence, patients with anterograde amnesia and matched control speakers reproduced prime sentences with different syntactic structures; reproduced 0, 1, 6, or 10 neutral sentences; then spontaneously described pictures that elicited the primed structures; and finally made recognition judgments for the prime sentences. Amnesic and control speakers showed significant and equivalent syntactic persistence, despite the amnesic speakers' profoundly impaired recognition memory for the primes. Thus, syntax is maintained by procedural-memory mechanisms. This result reveals that procedural memory is capable of supporting abstract, relational knowledge.

[1]  V. Ferreira,et al.  The functions of structural priming , 2006, Language and cognitive processes.

[2]  R. Hartsuiker,et al.  Syntactic Persistence in Dutch , 1998, Language and speech.

[3]  J. K. Bock.  Syntactic persistence in language production , 1986, Cognitive Psychology.

[4]  J. Huttenlocher,et al.  Syntactic priming in young children , 2004 .

[5]  N. Chater,et al.  Transfer in artificial grammar learning : A reevaluation , 1996 .

[6]  G. Dell,et al.  Persistent structural priming from language comprehension to language production , 2007, Cognition.

[7]  Kathryn Bock,et al.  Structural priming across languages , 2003 .

[8]  B. J. Winer.  Statistical Principles in Experimental Design , 1992 .

[9]  Alexandra A. Cleland,et al.  Syntactic co-ordination in dialogue , 2000, Cognition.

[10]  M. Pickering,et al.  The Representation of Verbs: Evidence from Syntactic Priming in Language Production , 1998 .

[11]  M. Pickering,et al.  Is Syntax Separate or Shared Between Languages? , 2004, Psychological science.

[12]  J. Sachs.  Recognition memory for syntactic and semantic aspects of connected discourse , 1967 .

[13]  C. Reynolds,et al.  Wechsler memory scale-revised , 1988 .

[14]  M. Pickering,et al.  Structural priming: a critical review. , 2008, Psychological bulletin.

[15]  Martin J. Pickering,et al.  Do writing and speaking employ the same syntactic representations , 2006 .

[16]  Eric Wanner,et al.  Language acquisition: the state of the art , 1982 .

[17]  M. Masson.  Using confidence intervals for graphically based data interpretation. , 2003, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[18]  K. Bock,et al.  Framing sentences , 1990, Cognition.

[19]  L. Squire,et al.  Artificial grammar learning depends on implicit acquisition of both abstract and exemplar-specific information. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[20]  P. Killeen,et al.  An Alternative to Null-Hypothesis Significance Tests , 2005, Psychological science.

[21]  Neal J. Cohen,et al.  Processing and short-term retention of relational information in amnesia , 2004, Neuropsychologia.

[22]  K. Bock,et al.  From conceptual roles to structural relations: bridging the syntactic cleft. , 1992, Psychological review.

[23]  Victor S. Ferreira,et al.  The persistence of optional complementizer production: Why saying “that” is not saying “that” at all , 2003 .

[24]  L. Squire.  Memory and the hippocampus: a synthesis from findings with rats, monkeys, and humans. , 1992, Psychological review.

[25]  Zenzi M. Griffin,et al.  The persistence of structural priming: transient activation or implicit learning? , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[26]  S. Pinker,et al.  A Neural Dissociation within Language: Evidence that the Mental Dictionary Is Part of Declarative Memory, and that Grammatical Rules Are Processed by the Procedural System , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[27]  J. Snedeker,et al.  Syntactic priming during language comprehension in three- and four-year-old children , 2008 .

[28]  Robert A. Bornstein,et al.  The Wechsler Memory Scale—Revised , 1990 .

[29]  N. Cohen,et al.  Amnesia is a Deficit in Relational Memory , 2000, Psychological science.

[30]  M. Pickering,et al.  Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue , 2004, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[31]  Benedikt Szmrecsanyi.  Language users as creatures of habit: A corpus-based analysis of persistence in spoken English , 2005 .

[32]  B. J. Winer,et al.  Statistical Principles in Experimental Design, 2nd Edition. , 1973 .

[33]  Kathryn Bock,et al.  Closed-class immanence in sentence production , 1989, Cognition.

[34]  R. Hartsuiker,et al.  Syntactic Facilitation in Agrammatic Sentence Production , 1998, Brain and Language.

[35]  M. Masson,et al.  Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[36]  G. Dell,et al.  Becoming syntactic. , 2006, Psychological review.

[37]  Neil A. Macmillan,et al.  Detection Theory: A User's Guide , 1991 .

[38]  H. Behrens.  From construction to construction: Commentary on Michael Tomasello's review essay ’The Return of Constructions‘ on Adele Goldberg's (1995). : ’Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure‘. , 1998 .