Response from Luck and Vogel

[1]  Edward K. Vogel,et al.  The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions , 1997, Nature.

[2]  J. Enns,et al.  Object Substitution: A New Form of Masking in Unattended Visual Locations , 1997 .

[3]  A Cohen,et al.  Density effects in conjunction search: evidence for a coarse location mechanism of feature integration. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  R. Ivry,et al.  Illusory conjunctions inside and outside the focus of attention. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[5]  H Pashler,et al.  Familiarity and visual change detection , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[6]  A. Treisman,et al.  Illusory conjunctions in the perception of objects , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[7]  P. Carpenter,et al.  Individual differences in working memory and reading , 1980 .

[8]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[9]  H A Simon,et al.  How Big Is a Chunk? , 1974, Science.

[10]  J. Ross,et al.  Some observations on memory artifice , 1968 .

[11]  W Singer,et al.  Visual feature integration and the temporal correlation hypothesis. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[12]  George Sperling,et al.  The information available in brief visual presentations. , 1960 .