The Pass-Along Effect: Investigating Word-of-Mouth Effects on Online Survey Procedures

Email petitions to complete online surveys may be forwarded beyond the intended sample. We term this phenomenon the pass-along effect and investigate it as a factor that can influence the nature and size of survey samples in an online context. We establish the pass-along effect as a form of word-of-mouth communication and draw from the literature in this area to present and test a model of factors that influence the occurrence of this effect. The results of two studies provide empirical support for the existence and impact of the pass-along effect. Among the factors that lead to this effect are involvement and relationship with the survey topic, size of a participant’s social network, and tie strength. The appropriateness of employing pass-along respondents as well as other implications for online sampling and survey research are discussed.

[1]  C. Mathwick.  Understanding the online consumer: A typology of online relational norms and behavior , 2002 .

[2]  Thomas J. Johnson,et al.  Research Methodology: Taming the Cyber Frontier , 1999 .

[3]  Robert M. Groves,et al.  Survey Errors and Survey Costs: Groves/Survey Errors , 2005 .

[4]  Curt J. Dommeyer,et al.  Comparing Two Forms of an E-mail Survey: Embedded vs Attached , 2000 .

[5]  Susan Sprachman,et al.  Costs and Benefits of Improving Response Rates for a Hard-to-Reach Population , 2003 .

[6]  J. Walther.  Computer-Mediated Communication , 1996 .

[7]  M. Sahlins.  Stone Age Economics , 2020 .

[8]  Douglas E. Shook,et al.  RELATIONSHIPS OF JOB CATEGORIES AND ORGANIZATIONAL LEVELS TO USE OF COMMUNICATION CHANNELS, INCLUDING ELECTRONIC MAIL: A META-ANALYSIS AND EXTENSION* , 1990 .

[9]  J. Heiss,et al.  Self-Evaluations of Blacks and Whites , 1972, American Journal of Sociology.

[10]  J. McAlexander,et al.  Subcultures of Consumption: An Ethnography of the New Bikers , 1995 .

[11]  Jennifer Edson Escalas.  Narrative Processing: Building Consumer Connections to Brands , 2004 .

[12]  A. Muñiz,et al.  Religiosity in the Abandoned Apple Newton Brand Community , 2005 .

[13]  Marsha L. Richins,et al.  The Role of Evolvement and Opinion Leadership in Consumer Word-Of-Mouth: an Implicit Model Made Explicit , 1988 .

[14]  Cristel Antonia Russell,et al.  The Consumption of Television Programming: Development and Validation of the Connectedness Scale , 2004 .

[15]  Raj Mehta,et al.  Comparing Response Rates and Response Content in Mail versus Electronic Mail Surveys , 1995 .

[16]  R. Kozinets.  Utopian Enterprise: Articulating the Meanings of Star Trek’s Culture of Consumption , 2001 .

[17]  R. Westbrook.  Product/Consumption-Based Affective Responses and Postpurchase Processes , 1987 .

[18]  W. Hamilton,et al.  The evolution of cooperation. , 1984, Science.

[19]  James E. Bartlett,et al.  Response rate, speed, and completeness: A comparison of Internet-based and mail surveys , 2002, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[20]  R. Groves,et al.  Survey Errors and Survey Costs. , 1991 .

[21]  P. Howard,et al.  Research Methodology , 2000 .

[22]  Cihan Cobanoglu,et al.  A Comparison of Mail, Fax and Web-Based Survey Methods , 2001 .

[23]  Alan Tse,et al.  Comparing Response Rate, Response Speed and Response Quality of Two Methods of Sending Questionnaires: E-mail vs. Mail , 1998 .

[24]  Murray Turoff,et al.  Computer‐mediated communication requirements for group support , 1991 .

[25]  S. Berg.  Snowball Sampling—I , 2006 .

[26]  M. Bergen,et al.  Agency Relationships in Marketing: A Review of the Implications and Applications of Agency and Related Theories , 1992 .

[27]  Alice M. Tybout,et al.  Designing Research for Application , 1981 .

[28]  Judith Lynne Zaichkowsky.  Conceptualizing and measuring the involvement construct in marketing , 1984 .

[29]  Mark S. Granovetter.  The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[30]  Peter H. Reingen,et al.  Social Ties and Word-of-Mouth Referral Behavior , 1987 .

[31]  J. McAlexander,et al.  Building Brand Community , 2002 .

[32]  Humphrey Taylor,et al.  Does Internet Research Work? , 2000 .

[33]  Thomas C. O'Guinn,et al.  brand community , 2022, The Fairchild Books Dictionary of Fashion.

[34]  Jonathan K. Frenzen,et al.  Structure, Cooperation, and the Flow of Market Information , 1993 .

[35]  J. Zaichkowsky.  Measuring the Involvement Construct , 1985 .

[36]  H. Demsetz,et al.  Production, Information Costs, and Economic Organization , 1975, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[37]  David K. Perry,et al.  Viral Marketing or Electronic Word-of-Mouth Advertising: Examining Consumer Responses and Motivations to Pass Along Email , 2004, Journal of Advertising Research.

[38]  Kim Bartel Sheehan,et al.  E-mail Survey Response Rates: A Review , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[39]  K. Sheehan.  Response Variation in E-Mail Surveys: An Exploration , 1999 .

[40]  C. Moorman,et al.  The Acquisition and Utilization of Information in New Product Alliances: A Strength-of-Ties Perspective , 2001 .

[41]  Charles L. Martin,et al.  Beanie Babies: a case study in the engineering of a high‐involvement/relationship‐prone brand , 2000 .

[42]  David Godes,et al.  Using Online Conversations to Study Word-of-Mouth Communication , 2004 .

[43]  J. Zaichkowsky.  The Personal Involvement Inventory: Reduction, Revision, and Application to Advertising , 1994 .

[44]  Leon G. Schiffman,et al.  Cybersenior research: A practical approach to data collection , 2001 .

[45]  Everett M. Rogers,et al.  New Communication Technology and the Changing Nature of Conversation , 2002 .