Stimulus intensity and information processing

The physiological and behavioral literature regarding effects of stimulus intensity on the time course of information processing is reviewed. The physiological data describe intensity effects on the sensory pathway. Reaction time studies show that the effect of intensity on behavioral responses also depends on and may be mediated by more cognitive processes. The degree to which intensity affects simple reaction time varies directly with the response criterion subjects use. The lack of this dependence in choice reaction time may indicate different intensity effects on energy and nonenergy pathways. The literature suggests that intensity affects the time course of information processing not only by influencing the speed of processing in sensory pathways, but also by affecting alertness and the time required to direct attention to a stimulus.

[1]  D. F. Fisher,et al.  Effect of stimulus degradation and similarity on the trade-off between speed and accuracy in absolute judgments. , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.

[2]  S. Beck.  EYELID CONDITIONING AS A FUNCTION OF CS INTENSITY, UCS INTENSITY, AND MANIFEST ANXIETY SCALE SCORE. , 1963, Journal of experimental psychology.

[3]  Jeff Miller,et al.  Locus of the stimulus probability effect , 1973 .

[4]  G. Kellas,et al.  Interactive effects of preparatory intervals, stimulus intensity, and experimental design on reaction time , 1969 .

[5]  C. K. Adams,et al.  Some properties of the reaction-time ready-signal. , 1966, The American journal of psychology.

[6]  I. Bernstein,et al.  Some exposure duration effects in simple reaction time. , 1973, Journal of experimental psychology.

[7]  J. Speiss.  Effects of preknowledge and stimulus intensity upon simple reaction time. , 1973, Journal of Experimental Psychology.

[8]  D M Green,et al.  A neural timing theory for response times and the psychophysics of intensity. , 1972, Psychological review.

[9]  G. H. Jacobs.  Effects of Adaptation on the Lateral Geniculate Response to Light Increment and Decrement , 1965 .

[10]  Andries F. Sanders,et al.  The Foreperiod Effect Revisited , 1975 .

[11]  S W Keele,et al.  Processing demands of sequential information , 1973, Memory & cognition.

[12]  L. Henderson.  Simple reaction time, statistical decision theory, and the speed-slowness tradeoff , 1970 .

[13]  R. Chocholle,et al.  Variation des temps de réaction auditifs en fonction de l'intensité à diverses fréquences , 1940 .

[14]  Donald I. Tepas,et al.  Properties of evoked visual potentials , 1962 .

[15]  M. Posner,et al.  On the selection of signals , 1973, Memory & cognition.

[16]  Michael I. Posner,et al.  Chapter 15 – Psychobiology of Attention , 1975 .

[17]  Neil R. Bartlett,et al.  A comparison of manual reaction times as measured by three sensitive indices , 1963 .

[18]  J. Lappin,et al.  The latency operating characteristic. II. Effects of visual stimulus intensity on choice reaction time. , 1972, Journal of experimental psychology.

[19]  R. L. Klingaman,et al.  Human auditory evoked response intensity functions from monopolar and bipolar scalp recordings , 1972 .

[20]  R S Nickerson,et al.  Intersensory facilitation of reaction time: energy summation or preparation enhancement? , 1973, Psychological review.

[21]  J. M. Cattell,et al.  THE INFLUENCE OF THE INTENSITY OF THE STIMULUS ON THE LENGTH OF THE REACTION TIME , 1886 .

[22]  Donald L. Schurman,et al.  Stimulus Intensity and Foreperiod Effects in Intersensory Facilitation , 1973, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[23]  J. H. Neely.  Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Evidence for facilitatory and inhibitory processes , 1976, Memory & cognition.

[24]  G. Grice,et al.  Stimulus intensity, catch trial effects, and the speed-accuracy tradeoff in reaction time: A variable criterion theory interptation , 1974, Memory & cognition.

[25]  D. Hamasaki,et al.  Comparison of LGN and optic tract intensity-response functions. , 1972, Vision Research.

[26]  D L Kohfeld,et al.  Effects of the intensity of auditory and visual ready signals on simple reaction time. , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.

[27]  J. Botwinick.  Joint effects of stimulus intensity and preparatory interval on simple auditory reaction time. , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.

[28]  A. Angel,et al.  Input-Output Relations in Simple Reaction Time Experiments , 1973, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[29]  R. Cone.  Early Receptor Potential of the Vertebrate Retina , 1964, Nature.

[30]  G. Kellas.  Effects of preparatory intervals and stimulus intensity on reaction times of normal and retarded individuals. , 1969, Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology.

[31]  M. L. Kietzman,et al.  Visual temporal integration and simple reaction time , 1972 .

[32]  G. Grice,et al.  STIMULUS INTENSITY EFFECTS DEPEND UPON THE TYPE OF EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN. , 1964, Psychological review.

[33]  Thomas H. Killion,et al.  Interaction of visual and cognitive effects in word recognition. , 1977 .

[34]  R. M. Boynton,et al.  Visual Adaptation in Monkey Cones: Recordings of Late Receptor Potentials , 1970, Science.

[35]  H G Vaughan,et al.  The functional relation of visual evoked response and reaction time to stimulus intensity. , 1966, Vision research.

[36]  Vidkunn Coucheron Thrane.  SENSORY AND PREPARATORY FACTORS IN RESPONSE LATENCY: Simple reaction or compensatory interaction? , 1960 .

[37]  D. A. Grant,et al.  Intensity of the conditioned stimulus and strength of conditioning; the conditioned galvanic skin response to an auditory stimulus. , 1949, Journal of experimental psychology.

[38]  D. Tepas,et al.  Auditory evoked brain responses: Intensity functions from bipolar human scalp recordings , 1972 .

[39]  Takehiro Ueno,et al.  Reaction time as a measure of temporal summation at suprathreshold levels , 1977, Vision Research.

[40]  M. Posner,et al.  Attention and cognitive control. , 1975 .

[41]  D. C. Teas,et al.  EVOKED RESPONSES FROM THE AUDITORY CERTEX. , 1964, Experimental neurology.

[42]  W. Stebbins,et al.  REACTION TIME AS A FUNCTION OF STIMULUS INTENSITY FOR THE MONKEY. , 1964, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[43]  P J Keuss,et al.  Reaction time to the second of two shortly spaced auditory signals both varying in intensity. , 1972, Acta psychologica.

[44]  R. Marrocco,et al.  Maintained activity of monkey optic tract fibers and lateral geniculate nucleus cells. , 1972, Vision research.

[45]  W. Levick.  Variation in the response latency of cat retinal ganglion cells. , 1973, Vision research.

[46]  J. Stone,et al.  Summing properties of the cat's retinal ganglion cell. , 1968, Vision research.

[47]  Stephen J. Boies,et al.  Components of attention. , 1971 .

[48]  R. Marrocco.  Possible neural basis of brighness magnitude estimations , 1975, Brain Research.

[49]  W. F. Hawkins,et al.  THE INTERACTIVE EFFECTS OF STIMULUS INTENSITY AND INTELLIGENCE UPON REACTION TIME. , 1965, American journal of mental deficiency.

[50]  J. Dugas,et al.  Effects of Warning Signal Intensity, Reaction Signal Intensity, Preparatory Interval, and Temporal Uncertainty on Reaction Times of Mental Defectives , 1967 .

[51]  G. Grice,et al.  Associative processes and strategies in disjunctive reaction time , 1976, Memory & Cognition.

[52]  J. Stone,et al.  Properties of cat retinal ganglion cells: a comparison of W-cells with X- and Y-cells. , 1974, Journal of neurophysiology.

[53]  W H Teichner,et al.  Laws of the simple visual reaction time. , 1972, Psychological review.

[54]  M. Posner,et al.  Visual dominance: an information-processing account of its origins and significance. , 1976, Psychological review.

[55]  Sanford Aj.  Criterion effects in simple reaction time: results with stimulus intensity and duration manipulations. , 1972 .

[56]  H. Begleiter,et al.  Evoked Potential Correlates of Expected Stimulus Intensity , 1973, Science.

[57]  Robert G. Pachella,et al.  Stimulus probability and same-different classification , 1976 .

[58]  J. Botwinick,et al.  Sensory-set factors in age differences in reaction time. , 1971, The Journal of Genetic Psychology.

[60]  H. K. Hartline,et al.  THE RESPONSE OF SINGLE OPTIC NERVE FIBERS OF THE VERTEBRATE EYE TO ILLUMINATION OF THE RETINA , 1938 .

[61]  J. Debecker,et al.  Intensity functions of the early receptor potential and of the melanin fast photovoltage in the human eye , 1975, Vision Research.

[62]  D. L. Kohfeld.  Stimulus intensity and adaptation level as determinants of simple reaction time. , 1968, Journal of experimental psychology.

[63]  W. Wundt,et al.  Grundzüge der physiologischen psyhcologie , 1893 .

[64]  Vidkunn Coucheron Thrane.  SENSORY AND PREPARATORY FACTORS IN RESPONSE LATENCY: The visual intensity function , 1960 .

[65]  R. Mansfield,et al.  Latency functions in human vision. , 1973, Vision research.

[66]  H. G. Murray.  Stimulus intensity and reaction time: Evaluation of a decision-theory model. , 1970 .

[67]  D. A. Grant,et al.  Intensity of the conditioned stimulus and strength of conditioning; the conditioned eyelid response to light. , 1948, Journal of experimental psychology.

[68]  Grice Gr,et al.  Stimulus intensity and response evocation. , 1968 .

[69]  D. Raab,et al.  Supplementary report: the effect of stimulus duration and luminance on visual reaction time. , 1962, Journal of experimental psychology.

[70]  M. Buchsbaum,et al.  The effects of attention, stimulus intensity, and individual differences on the average evoked response. , 1973, Psychophysiology.

[71]  S. Sternberg.  The discovery of processing stages , 1969 .

[72]  K. Henriksen.  Effects of false feedback and stimulus intensity on simple reaction time. , 1971, Journal of experimental psychology.

[73]  J. Brožek.  Attention and Performance II. , 1971 .

[74]  I. D. John,et al.  A statistical decision theory of simple reaction time , 1967 .

[75]  M. Murakami,et al.  The early and late receptor potentials of monkey cones and rods. , 1965, Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology.

[76]  Vidkunn Coucheron Thrane.  SENSORY AND PREPARATORY FACTORS IN RESPONSE LATENCY: III. Preknowledge and regularity of stimuli as antecedent variables , 1961 .

[77]  H. Vaughan,et al.  Functional Relation between Stimulus Intensity and Photically Evoked Cerebral Responses in Man , 1965, Nature.

[78]  W. F. Hawkins,et al.  Reaction Speed as a Function of Stimulus Intensity in Normals and Retardates , 1965, Perceptual and motor skills.

[79]  Brian A. Wandell,et al.  Speed-accuracy tradeoff in visual detection: Applications of neural counting and timing , 1977, Vision Research.

[80]  D. Raab,et al.  Visual reaction time and the Broca-Sulzer phenomenon. , 1961, Journal of experimental psychology.

[81]  J. Brebner,et al.  Choice RT with signals of unequal intensity , 1975 .

[82]  H. Barlow,et al.  Changes in the maintained discharge with adaptation level in the cat retina , 1969, The Journal of physiology.

[83]  D. L. Kohfeld.  Effects of Ready-Signal Intensity and Intensity of the Preceding Response Signal on Simple Reaction Time , 1969 .

[84]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Selective attention and the auditory vertex potential. Effects of signal intensity and masking noise. , 1976, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[85]  G. Robert Grice,et al.  Application of a variable criterion model to auditory reaction time as a function of the type of catch trial , 1972 .

[86]  David LaBerge,et al.  On the processing of simple visual and auditory stimuli at distinct levels , 1971 .

[87]  B. Cleland,et al.  Quantitative aspects of gain and latency in the cat retina , 1970, The Journal of physiology.

[88]  Irving Biederman,et al.  Stimulus discriminability and S-R compatibility: Evidence for independent effects in choice reaction time , 1970 .

[89]  R. Cone,et al.  The early receptor potential of the vertebrate eye. , 1965, Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology.

[90]  J R Bartlett,et al.  Response of units in striate cortex of squirrel monkeys to visual and electrical stimuli. , 1974, Journal of neurophysiology.

[91]  H. G. Murray,et al.  Role of adaptation level in stimulus intensity dynamism , 1965 .