Outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with myocardial infarction, cardiogenic shock and unresponsive neurological state: analysis of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Database

OBJECTIVES Previous studies have demonstrated a 20% mortality rate among patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for cardiogenic shock. However, outcomes following CABG for cardiogenic shock in patients who are neurologically unresponsive preoperatively are unknown. METHODS Utilizing the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database between July 2011 and December 2013, patients undergoing urgent or emergent CABG within 7 days of an acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock were identified. Patients were stratified on the basis of whether they had a non-medically induced unresponsive state within 24 h of surgery. RESULTS Of the 5259 patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock who underwent CABG during the study period, 243 (4.62%) patients had an unresponsive preoperative neurological state. The unresponsive cohort had a higher 30-day operative mortality than the responsive cohort (33.74% vs 16.91%, P < 0.001). Unresponsive neurological state was associated with increased odds for mortality (adjusted odds ratio 1.81, 95% confidence interval 1.37-2.4; P < 0.001), postoperative stroke (adjusted odds ratio 2.17, 95% confidence interval 1.27-3.73; P = 0.0048) and encephalopathy (adjusted odds ratio 2.08, 95% confidence interval 1.44-3.01; P < 0.001). Among survivors in the unresponsive cohort, 78 (46.15%) were discharged home and 62 (36.69%) were discharged to extended care facilities. CONCLUSIONS Although cardiac surgery in unresponsive patients in the setting of acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock is associated with considerable neurological disability and mortality, the majority survive to discharge. These findings may help guide patient and family discussions regarding goals of care.

[1]  E. Ohman,et al.  Contemporary Management of Cardiogenic Shock: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association , 2017, Circulation.

[2]  F. Crea,et al.  Long-Term Survival and Quality of Life of Patients Undergoing Emergency Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Postinfarction Cardiogenic Shock. , 2016, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[3]  V. Thourani,et al.  Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients With Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: Data From The Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Database. , 2016, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[4]  Neal W. Dickert,et al.  Cardiac Arrest: A Treatment Algorithm for Emergent Invasive Cardiac Procedures in the Resuscitated Comatose Patient. , 2015, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[5]  Sean M. O'Brien,et al.  The association of transcatheter aortic valve replacement availability and hospital aortic valve replacement volume and mortality in the United States. , 2014, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[6]  Helmut Baumgartner,et al.  2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization: the Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous , 2014, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[7]  Volkmar Falk,et al.  2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization: The Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS)Developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous Ca , 2014, European heart journal.

[8]  N. Parakh Intraaortic balloon support for myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock , 2012 .

[9]  Fred S Apple,et al.  Third universal definition of myocardial infarction , 2012 .

[10]  B. Gersh Survival and Neurologic Recovery in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Resuscitated From Cardiac Arrest , 2010 .

[11]  Sean M. O'Brien,et al.  The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2008 cardiac surgery risk models: part 1--coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. , 2009, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[12]  S. Assmann,et al.  Comparison of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting After Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock: Results From the Should We Emergently Revascularize Occluded Coronaries for Cardiogenic Shock (SHOCK) Trial , 2005, Circulation.

[13]  Laura P Coombs,et al.  The Society of Thoracic Surgeons: 30-day operative mortality and morbidity risk models. , 2003, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[14]  H. White,et al.  One-year survival following early revascularization for cardiogenic shock. , 2001, JAMA.

[15]  H. White,et al.  Early revascularization in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. SHOCK Investigators. Should We Emergently Revascularize Occluded Coronaries for Cardiogenic Shock. , 1999, The New England journal of medicine.