Relating age and hearing loss to monaural, bilateral, and binaural temporal sensitivity1

Older listeners are more likely than younger listeners to have difficulties in making temporal discriminations among auditory stimuli presented to one or both ears. In addition, the performance of older listeners is often observed to be more variable than that of younger listeners. The aim of this work was to relate age and hearing loss to temporal processing ability in a group of younger and older listeners with a range of hearing thresholds. Seventy-eight listeners were tested on a set of three temporal discrimination tasks (monaural gap discrimination, bilateral gap discrimination, and binaural discrimination of interaural differences in time). To examine the role of temporal fine structure in these tasks, four types of brief stimuli were used: tone bursts, broad-frequency chirps with rising or falling frequency contours, and random-phase noise bursts. Between-subject group analyses conducted separately for each task revealed substantial increases in temporal thresholds for the older listeners across all three tasks, regardless of stimulus type, as well as significant correlations among the performance of individual listeners across most combinations of tasks and stimuli. Differences in performance were associated with the stimuli in the monaural and binaural tasks, but not the bilateral task. Temporal fine structure differences among the stimuli had the greatest impact on monaural thresholds. Threshold estimate values across all tasks and stimuli did not show any greater variability for the older listeners as compared to the younger listeners. A linear mixed model applied to the data suggested that age and hearing loss are independent factors responsible for temporal processing ability, thus supporting the increasingly accepted hypothesis that temporal processing can be impaired for older compared to younger listeners with similar hearing and/or amounts of hearing loss.

[1]  Brian C. J. Moore,et al.  Auditory Processing of Temporal Fine Structure:Effects of Age and Hearing Loss , 2014 .

[2]  A. King,et al.  The effects of age and hearing loss on interaural phase difference discrimination. , 2014, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  K Saberi,et al.  Some considerations on the use of adaptive methods for estimating interaural-delay thresholds. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  S P Bacon,et al.  Modulation detection, modulation masking, and speech understanding in noise in the elderly. , 1992, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[5]  H S Colburn,et al.  Effects of Reference Interaural Time and Intensity Differences on Binaural Performance in Listeners with Normal and Impaired Hearing , 1995, Ear and hearing.

[6]  S Buus,et al.  Lateralization and frequency selectivity in normal and impaired hearing. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  M. Liberman,et al.  Adding Insult to Injury: Cochlear Nerve Degeneration after “Temporary” Noise-Induced Hearing Loss , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[8]  L. Hughes,et al.  Age-related changes in glycine receptor subunit composition and binding in dorsal cochlear nucleus , 2009, Neuroscience.

[9]  Jayne B Ahlstrom,et al.  Age-related differences in the temporal modulation transfer function with pure-tone carriers. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham,et al.  Normal hearing is not enough to guarantee robust encoding of suprathreshold features important in everyday communication , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  A. Kumar,et al.  Temporal processing abilities across different age groups. , 2011, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[12]  Brian C J Moore,et al.  Speech perception problems of the hearing impaired reflect inability to use temporal fine structure , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  Christian Füllgrabe,et al.  The influence of age and high-frequency hearing loss on sensitivity to temporal fine structure at low frequencies (L). , 2012, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  B Kollmeier,et al.  Auditory brainstem responses with optimized chirp signals compensating basilar-membrane dispersion. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  H. Gaskell The precedence effect , 1983, Hearing Research.

[16]  H S Colburn,et al.  Binaural interaction of impaired listeners. A review of past research. , 1981, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[17]  H S Colburn,et al.  The precedence effect. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  J. Grose,et al.  Processing of Temporal Fine Structure as a Function of Age , 2010, Ear and hearing.

[19]  J. Blauert Spatial Hearing: The Psychophysics of Human Sound Localization , 1983 .

[20]  Emily Buss,et al.  Temporal Fine-Structure Cues to Speech and Pure Tone Modulation in Observers with Sensorineural Hearing Loss , 2004, Ear and hearing.

[21]  M. Liberman,et al.  Age-Related Cochlear Synaptopathy: An Early-Onset Contributor to Auditory Functional Decline , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[22]  S. Gordon-Salant,et al.  Profile of auditory temporal processing in older listeners. , 1999, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[23]  H S Colburn,et al.  Frequency dependence of binaural performance in listeners with impaired binaural hearing. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  Bruce A. Schneider,et al.  Effects of Senescent Changes in Audition and Cognition on Spoken Language Comprehension , 2010 .

[25]  H. Levitt Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  Richard A. Roberts,et al.  Effects of Age and Hearing Loss on Gap Detection and the Precedence Effect , 2005 .

[27]  D. Irvine The Auditory Brainstem , 1986, Progress in Sensory Physiology.

[28]  L F Hughes,et al.  Age‐related synaptic changes in the central nucleus of the inferior colliculus of Fischer‐344 rats , 1999, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[29]  P. Rabinowitz,et al.  Noise-induced hearing loss. , 2000, American family physician.

[30]  S. Gordon-Salant,et al.  Behavioral Studies With Aging Humans: Hearing Sensitivity and Psychoacoustics , 2010 .

[31]  Torsten Dau,et al.  Relations between frequency selectivity, temporal fine-structure processing, and speech reception in impaired hearing. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[32]  Brian C J Moore,et al.  The importance of temporal fine structure information in speech at different spectral regions for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[33]  M. Liberman,et al.  Acceleration of Age-Related Hearing Loss by Early Noise Exposure: Evidence of a Misspent Youth , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[34]  S. Laugesen,et al.  Can basic auditory and cognitive measures predict hearing-impaired listeners' localization and spatial speech recognition abilities? , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[35]  Bernhard Ross,et al.  Aging in Binaural Hearing Begins in Mid-Life: Evidence from Cortical Auditory-Evoked Responses to Changes in Interaural Phase , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[36]  Kenneth S Henry,et al.  Diminished temporal coding with sensorineural hearing loss emerges in background noise , 2012, Nature Neuroscience.

[37]  克己 原田,et al.  聴性中間反応のBinaural Interaction -第三報- , 1983 .

[38]  F L Wightman,et al.  On-frequency masking with continuous sinusoids. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[39]  Richard A. Roberts,et al.  Effects of age and hearing loss on gap detection and the precedence effect: narrow-band stimuli. , 2004, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[40]  Ping Zhang,et al.  Effects of S-adenosylmethionine on liver methionine metabolism and steatosis with ethanol-induced liver injury in rats , 2008, Hepatology international.

[41]  B A Schneider,et al.  Gap detection and the precedence effect in young and old adults. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[42]  Jayne B Ahlstrom,et al.  Spectral contributions to the benefit from spatial separation of speech and noise. , 2002, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[43]  Brian C J Moore,et al.  The effects of age and cochlear hearing loss on temporal fine structure sensitivity, frequency selectivity, and speech reception in noise. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[44]  C Trahiotis,et al.  Discrimination of interaural temporal disparities by normal-hearing listeners and listeners with high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[45]  A. Cacace,et al.  Translational Perspectives in Auditory Neuroscience: Normal Aspects of Hearing , 2014 .

[46]  Laurent Demany,et al.  Consequences of cochlear damage for the detection of interaural phase differences. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[47]  J. Ahlstrom,et al.  Binaural advantage for younger and older adults with normal hearing. , 2008, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[48]  B. Moore,et al.  Detection of temporal gaps in sinusoids by elderly subjects with and without hearing loss. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[49]  Daniel J. Tollin,et al.  The Precedence Effect in Sound Localization , 2015, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.