Inline measurement strategy for additive manufacturing

Additive manufacturing takes a growing place in industry tanks to its ability to create free-form parts with internal complex shape. Yet, the quality of the final surfaces of the additive manufacturing parts is still a challenge since it doesn’t reach the required level for final use. To address this issue, it is necessary to measure the form and dimension deviation in order to plan post-process operations to be considerate. Moreover in a context of industry 4.0, this measurement step should be fully integrated into the manufacturing line as close as possible to the additive manufacturing process and post-process. We introduce in this article an inline measurement solution based on a robot combined with a laser sensor. Robot allows reaching most of the orientation and positions necessary to digitize complex parts in a short time. The use of robot for digitizing is already addressed but not for metrological applications. Robots are perfectly designed for velocity, ability and robustness but their poor positioning accuracy is not compatible with measuring requirements. The strategy adopted in this article is to provide an algorithm to generate path planning for digitizing additive manufacturing parts at a given quality of the resulting cloud of points. After a discussion about the geometric and elastic model of the robot to identify the one that answers the quality requirements, the performances of the robot are evaluated. Thus, several performances maps are introduced to characterize the behavior of the robot in its working volume. The qualification of the digitizing sensor is also performed to identify relation between digitizing parameters and the quality of final cloud of points. Using data resulting from the qualifications of sensor and robot and the parts CAD model, the algorithm allows generating path planning to ensure the final quality necessary to measure the shape deviation.

[1]  R K Leach,et al.  Invited Review Article: Review of post-process optical form metrology for industrial-grade metal additive manufactured parts. , 2016, The Review of scientific instruments.

[2]  I. Roberts,et al.  Investigation of residual stresses in the laser melting of metal powders in additive layer manufacturing , 2012 .

[3]  Jorge Santolaria,et al.  Laser tracker-based kinematic parameter calibration of industrial robots by improved CPA method and active retroreflector , 2013 .

[4]  Peter Corke,et al.  High-Performance Visual Closed-Loop Robot Control , 1994 .

[5]  Jorge Santolaria,et al.  Modelling and Calibration Technique of Laser Triangulation Sensors for Integration in Robot Arms and Articulated Arm Coordinate Measuring Machines , 2009, Sensors.

[6]  Giovanna Sansoni,et al.  State-of-The-Art and Applications of 3D Imaging Sensors in Industry, Cultural Heritage, Medicine, and Criminal Investigation , 2009, Sensors.

[7]  Xuan F. Zha,et al.  Optimal pose trajectory planning for robot manipulators , 2002 .

[8]  J. J. Uicker,et al.  A Generalized Symbolic Notation for Mechanisms , 1971 .

[9]  A. Olabi,et al.  Improving the accuracy of industrial robots by offline compensation of joints errors , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology.

[10]  Laurent Dubourg,et al.  Impact & improvement of tool deviation in friction stir welding , 2016 .

[11]  A. Liegeois,et al.  Automatic supervisory control of the configuration and behavior of multi-body mechanisms , 1977 .

[12]  Bahram Ravani,et al.  An overview of robot calibration , 1987, IEEE Journal on Robotics and Automation.

[13]  F. Martina,et al.  Design for Additive Manufacturing , 2019 .

[14]  Jorge Santolaria,et al.  3D Geometrical Inspection of Complex Geometry Parts Using a Novel Laser Triangulation Sensor and a Robot , 2011, Sensors.

[15]  Taejung Kim,et al.  Toolpath generation along directions of maximum kinematic performance; a first cut at machine-optimal paths , 2002, Comput. Aided Des..

[16]  Peihua Gu,et al.  Geometric error compensation method based on Floyd algorithm and product of exponential screw theory , 2018 .

[17]  J. Denavit,et al.  A kinematic notation for lower pair mechanisms based on matrices , 1955 .

[18]  G. Gogu,et al.  Rigidity analysis of T3R1 parallel robot with uncoupled kinematics , 2004 .

[19]  Luo Fei,et al.  An Overview of Robot Calibration , 2004 .

[20]  Samad Hayati,et al.  Robot arm geometric link parameter estimation , 1983, The 22nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[21]  Sören Larsson,et al.  Motion control and data capturing for laser scanning with an industrial robot , 2006, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[22]  Wisama Khalil,et al.  A new geometric notation for open and closed-loop robots , 1986, Proceedings. 1986 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[23]  Paul G. Maropoulos,et al.  Large-volume metrology instrument selection and measurability analysis , 2010, DET.

[24]  Wisama Khalil,et al.  Geometric Calibration of Robots with Flexible Joints and Links , 2002, J. Intell. Robotic Syst..

[25]  Damien Chablat,et al.  Enhanced stiffness modeling of manipulators with passive joints , 2011, ArXiv.

[26]  Vladimir Brailovski,et al.  Metrological investigation of a selective laser melting additive manufacturing system: A case study , 2016 .

[27]  Eberhard Abele,et al.  Modeling and Identification of an Industrial Robot for Machining Applications , 2007 .

[28]  R. Saltaren,et al.  Ìndices de Desempeño de Robots Manipuladores, una revisión del Estado del Arte , 2012 .

[29]  M A. Donmez,et al.  Proposal for a standardized test artifact for additive manufacturing machines and processes | NIST , 2012 .

[30]  Charyar Mehdi-Souzani,et al.  Towards a New Concept of In-Line Crankshaft Balancing by Contact Less Measurement: Process for Selecting the Best Digitizing System , 2012 .

[31]  Kuang-Chao Fan,et al.  A novel method of angular positioning error analysis of rotary stages based on the Abbe principle , 2018 .

[32]  J. Angeles,et al.  The Kinetostatic Optimization of Robotic Manipulators: The Inverse and the Direct Problems , 2006 .

[33]  Charyar Mehdi-Souzani,et al.  A knowledge database of qualified digitizing systems for the selection of the best system according to the application , 2016 .

[34]  John M. Hollerbach,et al.  A survey of kinematic calibration , 1989 .

[35]  G.-C. Vosniakos,et al.  Industrial robot path planning in a constraint-based computer-aided design and kinematic analysis environment , 2009 .

[36]  Jean-François Brethé,et al.  A stochastic ellipsoid approach to repeatability modelisation of industrial manipulator robots , 2002, IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[37]  Yinglin Ke,et al.  Finite element simulation and experimental analysis of robotic boring based on an approach of equivalent stiffness , 2018 .

[38]  Paul G. Maropoulos,et al.  Recent developments in large-scale dimensional metrology , 2009 .

[39]  Tsuneo Yoshikawa,et al.  Manipulability of Robotic Mechanisms , 1985 .

[40]  Kevin K. Jurrens,et al.  Lessons Learned in Establishing the NIST Metal Additive Manufacturing Laboratory , 2013 .

[41]  Charyar Mehdi-Souzani,et al.  Comparative Study for the Metrological Characterization of Additive Manufacturing artefacts , 2017 .

[42]  Carmelo Mineo,et al.  Robotic path planning for non-destructive testing – A custom MATLAB toolbox approach , 2016 .

[43]  Daniel E. Whitney,et al.  Industrial Robot Forward Calibration Method and Results , 1986 .

[44]  Lisandro J. Puglisi,et al.  Performance indices for robotic manipulators: a review of the state of the art , 2012 .

[45]  Morris R. Driels,et al.  Generalized joint model for robot manipulator kinematic calibration and compensation , 1987, J. Field Robotics.