Alteration of neural action potential patterns by axonal stimulation: the importance of stimulus location

OBJECTIVE Stimulation of peripheral nerves is often superimposed on ongoing motor and sensory activity in the same axons, without a quantitative model of the net action potential train at the axon endpoint. APPROACH We develop a model of action potential patterns elicited by superimposing constant frequency axonal stimulation on the action potentials arriving from a physiologically activated neural source. The model includes interactions due to collision block, resetting of the neural impulse generator, and the refractory period of the axon at the point of stimulation. MAIN RESULTS Both the mean endpoint firing rate and the probability distribution of the action potential firing periods depend strongly on the relative firing rates of the two sources and the intersite conduction time between them. When the stimulus rate exceeds the neural rate, neural action potentials do not reach the endpoint and the rate of endpoint action potentials is the same as the stimulus rate, regardless of the intersite conduction time. However, when the stimulus rate is less than the neural rate, and the intersite conduction time is short, the two rates partially sum. Increases in stimulus rate produce non-monotonic increases in endpoint rate and continuously increasing block of neurally generated action potentials. Rate summation is reduced and more neural action potentials are blocked as the intersite conduction time increases. At long intersite conduction times, the endpoint rate simplifies to being the maximum of either the neural or the stimulus rate. SIGNIFICANCE This study highlights the potential of increasing the endpoint action potential rate and preserving neural information transmission by low rate stimulation with short intersite conduction times. Intersite conduction times can be decreased with proximal stimulation sites for muscles and distal stimulation sites for sensory endings. The model provides a basis for optimizing experiments and designing neuroprosthetic interventions involving motor or sensory stimulation.

[1]  C. D. De Luca,et al.  Inference of motor unit recruitment order in voluntary and electrically elicited contractions. , 1990, Journal of applied physiology.

[2]  Nathaniel Makowski,et al.  Interaction of poststroke voluntary effort and functional neuromuscular electrical stimulation. , 2013, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[3]  Dominique M. Durand,et al.  Electrode Array for Reversing the Recruitment Order of Peripheral Nerve Stimulation: Experimental Studies , 2006, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[4]  Y. Fukami Interaction of impulse activities originating from individual Golgi tendon organs innervated by branches of a single axon. , 1980, The Journal of physiology.

[5]  C. Azevedo-Coste,et al.  Comparative analysis of transverse intrafascicular multichannel, longitudinal intrafascicular and multipolar cuff electrodes for the selective stimulation of nerve fascicles , 2011, Journal of neural engineering.

[6]  Mary Y. Harley,et al.  Contralaterally Controlled Functional Electrical Stimulation for Upper Extremity Hemiplegia , 2012, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[7]  J Mizrahi,et al.  Muscle enhancement using closed-loop electrical stimulation: volitional versus induced torque. , 2007, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[8]  Ronald J Triolo,et al.  Optimization of selective stimulation parameters for multi-contact electrodes , 2013, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[9]  R. Purple,et al.  Afferent fibers with multiple encoding sites. , 1974, Brain research.

[10]  Kevin L. Kilgore,et al.  Challenges and Opportunities in Restoring Function After Paralysis , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[11]  Young-Hui Chang,et al.  Autogenic EMG-controlled functional electrical stimulation for ankle dorsiflexion control , 2010, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[12]  M. D. Goldfinger Superposition of impulse activity in a rapidly-adapting afferent unit model , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.

[13]  J. Borg Refractory period of single motor nerve fibres in man. , 1984, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[14]  G. Loeb,et al.  Mathematical models of proprioceptors. I. Control and transduction in the muscle spindle. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  Nathaniel S. Makowski,et al.  Muscle response to simultaneous stimulated and physiological action potential trains - A simulation study , 2012, 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[16]  A J Fuglevand,et al.  Estimating the strength of common input to human motoneurons from the cross‐correlogram. , 1992, The Journal of physiology.

[17]  J. Eccles,et al.  The central action of antidromic impulses in motor nerve fibres , 2004, Pflüger's Archiv für die gesamte Physiologie des Menschen und der Tiere.

[18]  C. D. De Luca,et al.  Behaviour of human motor units in different muscles during linearly varying contractions , 1982, The Journal of physiology.

[19]  D. Tapper,et al.  Integration of impulse activity in a peripheral sensory unit. , 1966, Experimental neurology.

[20]  J T Mortimer,et al.  Stability of the input-output properties of chronically implanted multiple contact nerve cuff stimulating electrodes. , 1998, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[21]  D. F. Collins,et al.  Motor unit recruitment when neuromuscular electrical stimulation is applied over a nerve trunk compared with a muscle belly: quadriceps femoris. , 2011, Journal of applied physiology.

[22]  Sue Francis,et al.  Physiological measurements using ultra-high field fMRI: a review , 2014, Physiological measurement.

[23]  D. P. Lloyd THE INTERACTION OF ANTIDROMIC AND ORTHODROMIC VOLLEYS IN A SEGMENTAL SPINAL MOTOR NUCLEUS , 1943 .

[24]  J. Thomas Mortimer,et al.  A Technique for Collision Block of Peripheral Nerve: Frequency Dependence , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[25]  Chris M Gregory,et al.  Recruitment patterns in human skeletal muscle during electrical stimulation. , 2005, Physical therapy.

[26]  W. Grill,et al.  Quantification of recruitment properties of multiple contact cuff electrodes. , 1996, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[27]  Anthony S Wexler,et al.  A phenomenological model that predicts forces generated when electrical stimulation is superimposed on submaximal volitional contractions. , 2010, Journal of applied physiology.

[28]  Narendra Bhadra,et al.  Bursting stimulation of proximal urethral afferents improves bladder pressures and voiding. , 2009, Journal of neural engineering.

[29]  Chou-Ching K. Lin,et al.  Structural Model of the Muscle Spindle , 2004, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[30]  J. Mizrahi,et al.  Partition Between Volitional and Induced Forces in Electrically Augmented Dynamic Isometric Muscle Contractions , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[31]  J. Lipski,et al.  Antidromic activation of neurones as an analytic tool in the study of the central nervous system , 1981, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[32]  D. Durand,et al.  Functionally selective peripheral nerve stimulation with a flat interface nerve electrode , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.