On integration and adaptation in complex service systems

The services sector employs a large and growing proportion of workers in the industrialized nations, and it is increasingly dependent on information and communication technologies. While the interdependences, similarities and complementarities of manufacturing and services are significant, there are considerable differences between goods and services, including the shift in focus from mass production to mass customization (whereby a service is produced and delivered in response to a customer’s stated or imputed needs). In general, services can be considered to be knowledge-intensive agents or components which work together as providers and consumers to create or co-produce value. Like manufacturing systems, an efficient service system must be an integrated system of systems, leading to greater connectivity and interdependence. Integration must occur over the physical, temporal, organizational and functional dimensions, and must include methods concerned with the component, the management, and the system. Moreover, an effective service system must also be an adaptable system, leading to greater value and responsiveness. Adaptation must occur over the dimensions of monitoring, feedback, cybernetics and learning, and must include methods concerned with space, time, and system. In sum, service systems are indeed complex, especially due to the uncertainties associated with the human-centered aspects of such systems. Moreover, the system complexities can only be dealt with methods that enhance system integration and adaptation. The paper concludes with several insights, including a plea to shift the current misplaced focus on developing a science or discipline for services to further developing a systems engineering approach to services, an approach based on the integration and adaptation of a host of sciences or disciplines (e.g., physics, mathematics, statistics, psychology, sociology, etc.). In fact, what is required is a services-related transdisciplinary - beyond a single disciplinary - ontology or taxonomy as a basis for disciplinary integration and adaptation.

[1]  William A. Wallace,et al.  Real-Time Decision Support for Emergency Management: An Integration of Advanced Computer and Communications Technology , 1995 .

[2]  James M. Tien,et al.  Services: A System's Perspective , 2008, IEEE Systems Journal.

[3]  David L. Craft,et al.  Emergency response to a smallpox attack: The case for mass vaccination , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  Jeanne G. Harris,et al.  Competing on Analytics: The New Science of Winning , 2007 .

[5]  Ananth Krishnamurthy,et al.  Towards real-time customized management of supply and demand chains , 2004 .

[6]  Dave Taylor,et al.  Let Go to Grow: Escaping the Commodity Trap, First Edition , 2005 .

[7]  James M. Tien,et al.  Viewing urban disruptions from a decision informatics perspective , 2005, Journal of systems science and systems engineering.

[8]  W. Wallace,et al.  Studying Organizationally-situated Improvisation in Response to Extreme Events , 2004, International Journal of Mass Emergencies & Disasters.

[9]  D. Murphey,et al.  The World Is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-First Century , 2006 .

[10]  B. Joseph Pine,et al.  The Experience Economy , 2020, Journal of Orthopaedic Experience & Innovation.

[11]  Madan M. Gupta,et al.  Fuzzy automata and decision processes , 1977 .

[12]  James M. Tien,et al.  A calculus for services innovation , 2007, Journal of systems science and systems engineering.

[13]  James M. Tien,et al.  Toward a decision informatics paradigm: a real-time, information-based approach to decision making , 2003, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part C.

[14]  Joseph Sussman Intelligent Transportation Systems in a Real-Time, Customer-Oriented Society , 2008 .

[15]  Rashmi Jain,et al.  Exploring the Impact of Systems Architecture and Systems Requirements on Systems Integration Complexity , 2008, IEEE Systems Journal.

[16]  Keith W. Hipel,et al.  The Future of Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Application Domains and Research Methods , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews).

[17]  James M. Tien,et al.  Systems engineering in the growing service economy , 1995 .

[18]  George W. Bush,et al.  Executive order on critical infrastructure protection , 2002, CFP '02.

[19]  James Brian Quinn,et al.  Technology in services , 1987 .

[20]  Paul P. Maglio,et al.  Service systems, service scientists, SSME, and innovation , 2006, CACM.

[21]  Lida Xu,et al.  An Integrated Approach for Agricultural Ecosystem Management , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews).

[22]  Vijay Govindarajan,et al.  Ten Rules for Strategic Innovators: From Idea to Execution , 2005 .

[23]  James M. Tien,et al.  A case for service systems engineering , 2003 .

[24]  L. A. Zadeh,et al.  The evolution of systems analysis and control: a personal perspective , 1996 .

[25]  James M. Tien Individual-centered education: An any one, any time, any where approach to engineering education , 2000, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part C.

[26]  James M. Tien,et al.  On services research and education , 2006, Journal of systems science and systems engineering.

[27]  丸山 宏 Global Innovation Outlook--今後のイノベーションはどこへ向かうか , 2006 .

[28]  James M. Tien,et al.  Services Innovation: Decision Attributes, Innovation Enablers, and Innovation Drivers , 2007, Service Enterprise Integration.