Goal attainment in urban ecology research: A bibliometric review 1975–2004

AbstractWe analyze a core literature of urban ecology (all articles published in Urban Ecology and Urban Ecosystems from 1975–2004, n = 261) to support a reflexive analysis of the field. We structure this critical analysis based on criteria derived from programmatic statements made by scientific societies, research funding organizations and academic institutions regarding what urban ecology should be. Specifically, we assess the extent to which the literature reflects, and has evolved to reflect, a commitment to strengthen and expand the discipline of ecologycreate a transdisciplinary enterprise, andcontribute to social and ecological wellbeing through applied research and policy engagement.Findings indicate that the literature strongly reflects these commitments, as these three tenets usefully describe the field and its evolution. We do, however, identify a tendency over time toward a more strictly disciplinary orientation. Ecological science is increasingly dominant and threatens to crowd out other scientific perspectives. This trend suggests that the field is maturing in the institutional sense, but perhaps at the cost of intellectual diversity, which many believe to be the basis of innovative solutions.

[1]  U. Kreuter,et al.  Groundwater Supply in Texas: Private Land Considerations in a Rule-of-Capture State , 2004 .

[2]  Steward T. A. Pickett,et al.  Methods for spatial and temporal land use and land cover assessment for urban ecosystems and application in the greater Baltimore-Chesapeake region , 1997, Urban Ecosystems.

[3]  Maarten A. Hajer,et al.  Deliberative Policy Analysis: Contents , 2003 .

[4]  F. Fischer.  Citizens, Experts, and the Environment: The Politics of Local Knowledge , 2000 .

[5]  Jonathan Furner,et al.  Scholarly communication and bibliometrics , 2005, Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[6]  W. Zipperer,et al.  Ecosystem processes along an urban-to-rural gradient , 2005, Urban Ecosystems.

[7]  Scientist Activism in Environmental Justice Conflicts: An Argument for Synergy , 2004 .

[8]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[9]  N. McCarthy,et al.  Linking Social and Ecological Systems: Management Practices and Social Mechanisms for Building Resilience , 2000 .

[10]  Scott Frickel,et al.  The New Political Sociology of Science: Institutions, Networks, and Power , 2006 .

[11]  Jianguo Wu,et al.  Collaborative landscape-scale ecological research: Emerging trends in urban and regional ecology , 2004, Urban Ecosystems.

[12]  Henry Etzkowitz,et al.  The Triple Helix as a model for innovation studies , 1998 .

[13]  Nancy E. McIntyre,et al.  Urban Ecology as an Interdisciplinary Field: Differences in the use of “Urban” Between the Social and Natural Sciences , 2008 .

[14]  Richard M. Harris,et al.  NATURE'S METROPOLIS , 1994 .

[15]  Lars Frederiksen,et al.  The Agora and the Role of Research Evaluation , 2003 .

[16]  M. Wackernagel,et al.  Urban ecological footprints: Why cities cannot be sustainable—And why they are a key to sustainability , 1996 .

[17]  C. Edquist.  Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organizations , 1997 .

[18]  D. Lindenmayer,et al.  What do conservation biologists publish , 2005 .

[19]  I. Hunter.  What do people want from urban forestry?—The European experience , 2001, Urban Ecosystems.

[20]  M. Hagberg.  Editorial , 2004 .

[21]  Kirstin Dow,et al.  Social dimensions of gradients in urban ecosystems , 2000, Urban Ecosystems.

[22]  M. Mazari-Hiriart,et al.  Microbiological groundwater quality and health indicators in Mexico City , 2000, Urban Ecosystems.

[23]  J. R. Lyons.  Urban ecosystem management: bringing science and policy together , 1997, Urban Ecosystems.

[24]  S. Pickett,et al.  A conceptual framework for the study of human ecosystems in urban areas , 1997, Urban Ecosystems.

[25]  R. May.  Editorial—On the role of the humanities in urban ecology: The case of St. Petersburg , 2004, Urban Ecosystems.

[26]  J. Kaiser.  Ecologists on a Mission to Save the World , 2000, Science.

[27]  J. P. Collins,et al.  A New Urban Ecology , 2000, American Scientist.

[28]  R. Blair,et al.  Woody vegetation and canopy fragmentation along a forest-to-urban gradient , 2001, Urban Ecosystems.

[29]  Steward T. A. Pickett,et al.  Ecosystem processes along an urban-to-rural gradient , 2005, Urban Ecosystems.

[30]  L. Hempel.  Environmental Governance: The Global Challenge , 1995 .

[31]  N. McIntyre,et al.  Urban ecology as an interdisciplinary field: differences in the use of “urban” between the social and natural sciences , 2004, Urban Ecosystems.

[32]  Y. Fouda.  A GIS for environmental assessment of air pollution impacts on urban clusters and natural landscape at Rosetta City and region, Egypt , 2004, Urban Ecosystems.