Are landscape complexity and farm specialisation related to land-use intensity of annual crop fields?

Abstract Little is known about the predictive value of landscape complexity and farm specialisation for land-use intensity, although this is critical for regional agri–environmental schemes and conservation of biodiversity. Here, we analysed land-use intensity of annual crop fields of 30 farms in northern Germany that were located in 15 landscapes differing in structural complexity ranging from 65% non-crop habitats. The proportion of arable land per landscape was used as simple predictor of landscape complexity due to its close correlation with habitat-type diversity, and the proportion of arable land per farm acted as an indicator for farm specialisation due to its negative correlation with stock farming. Land-use intensity was quantified using questionnaires. Landscape complexity and farm specialisation were related to several but not all indicators of land-use intensity. Structurally simple landscapes were related to more nitrogen input and higher crop yields, and farms specialised on annual crops had reduced crop-species diversity, larger fields, higher crop yields and more pathogen species. In contrast to general expectations, pesticide use in annual crop fields was exceptionally high and not a function of landscape complexity or farm specialisation. Our results show that generalisations such as “farms specialised on annual crops and structurally simple landscapes show increased land-use intensity” may be misleading.

[1]  N. Sotherton,et al.  The Effects of Beneficial Arthropods of the Exclusion of Herbicides from Cereal Crop Edges , 1991 .

[2]  J. Roland,et al.  Insect parasitoid species respond to forest structure at different spatial scales , 1997, Nature.

[3]  Gonzalez,et al.  Metapopulation dynamics, abundance, and distribution in a microecosystem , 1998, Science.

[4]  D. Landis,et al.  DOES AGRICULTURAL LANDSCAPE STRUCTURE AFFECT PARASITISM AND PARASITOID DIVERSITY , 1999 .

[5]  M. L. Cadenasso,et al.  Landscape Ecology: Spatial Heterogeneity in Ecological Systems , 1995, Science.

[6]  F. Beinroth Relationships between U.S. soil taxonomy, the Brazilian soil classification system, and FAO/UNESCO [Food and Agriculture Organization/United Nations, Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization] soil units , 1975 .

[7]  S. Polasky,et al.  Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices , 2002, Nature.

[8]  W. Parton,et al.  Agricultural intensification and ecosystem properties. , 1997, Science.

[9]  Carsten Thies,et al.  Effects of landscape context on herbivory and parasitism at different spatial scales , 2003 .

[10]  M. Hunter Landscape structure, habitat fragmentation, and the ecology of insects , 2002 .

[11]  P. Kareiva Population dynamics in spatially complex environments: theory and data , 1990 .

[12]  C. Thenail Relationships between farm characteristics and the variation of the density of hedgerows at the level of a micro-region of bocage landscape. Study case in Brittany, France , 2002 .

[13]  T. Tscharntke,et al.  Pollination, seed set and seed predation on a landscape scale , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[14]  R. Gardner,et al.  Quantitative Methods in Landscape Ecology , 1991 .

[15]  Mary L. Cadenasso,et al.  Linking forest edge structure to edge function: mediation of herbivore damage , 2000 .

[16]  O. Christen,et al.  The Effect of Different Preceding Crops on the Development, Growth and Yield of Winter Barley , 1993 .

[17]  Ü. Mander,et al.  Ecological and low intensity agriculture as contributors to landscape and biological diversity , 1999 .

[18]  David Kleijn,et al.  Agri-environment schemes do not effectively protect biodiversity in Dutch agricultural landscapes , 2001, Nature.

[19]  Miguel A. Altieri,et al.  The effects of a vegetational corridor on the abundance and dispersal of insect biodiversity within a northern California organic vineyard , 2001, Landscape Ecology.

[20]  John R. Krebs,et al.  The second Silent Spring? , 1999, Nature.

[21]  Henryk Luka,et al.  Overwintering of arthropods in soils of arable fields and adjacent semi-natural habitats , 2000 .

[22]  M. Thomas,et al.  Structural Features of Field Boundaries Which Influence the Overwintering Densities of Beneficial Arthropod Predators , 1994 .

[23]  J. Lagerlöf,et al.  Margins of agricultural fields as habitats for pollinating insects , 1992 .

[24]  Teja Tscharntke,et al.  SCALE‐DEPENDENT EFFECTS OF LANDSCAPE CONTEXT ON THREE POLLINATOR GUILDS , 2002 .

[25]  P. Mineau,et al.  The impact of agricultural practices on biodiversity , 1995 .

[26]  T. Ricketts The Matrix Matters: Effective Isolation in Fragmented Landscapes , 2001, The American Naturalist.

[27]  Carsten Thies,et al.  Landscape structure and biological control in agroecosystems , 1999, Science.

[28]  J. Baudry,et al.  Variation of farm spatial land use pattern according to the structure of the hedgerow network (bocage) landscape: a case study in northeast Brittany , 2004 .

[29]  L. Fahrig,et al.  On the usage and measurement of landscape connectivity , 2000 .

[30]  J. M. Varchola,et al.  Influence of hedgerow and grassy field borders on ground beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae) activity in fields of corn , 2001 .

[31]  Uno Wennergren,et al.  Connecting landscape patterns to ecosystem and population processes , 1995, Nature.

[32]  Brian G. Wolff,et al.  Forecasting Agriculturally Driven Global Environmental Change , 2001, Science.

[33]  Rat von Sachverständigen für Umweltfragen,et al.  Umweltprobleme der Landwirtschaft : Sachbuch Ökologie , 1992 .

[34]  Thorsten Wiegand,et al.  Finding the Missing Link between Landscape Structure and Population Dynamics: A Spatially Explicit Perspective , 1999, The American Naturalist.