Effects of frequency and similarity neighborhoods on pharmacists' visual perception of drug names.

To minimize drug name confusion errors, regulators, drug companies, and clinicians need tools that help them predict which names are most likely to be involved in confusions. Two experiments, carried out in the United States, examined the effects of stimulus frequency (i.e., how frequently a target name is prescribed), neighborhood frequency (i.e., how frequently prescribed are the "neighbors" of the target name), and neighborhood density (how many names are within a fixed distance of the target name) on the probability of pharmacists making an error in a visual perceptual identification task. In both experiments, the task was to correctly identify a series of blurry drug names after a 3s presentation on a computer monitor. In the first experiment, 45 pharmacists viewed 160 typewritten names, incorrectly identifying 60.6% of them. Random effects regression revealed a significant beneficial effect of stimulus frequency and a detrimental effect of neighborhood density. Significant two-way interactions were observed between stimulus frequency and neighborhood density and neighborhood frequency and neighborhood density. In the second experiment, 37 pharmacists viewed 156 handwritten drug names, incorrectly identifying 45.7%. Random effects regression revealed significant main effects of stimulus frequency and neighborhood density. These were contained within a significant three-way interaction: The interaction between stimulus frequency and neighborhood density was present at high but not low neighborhood frequency. Objectively measurable frequency and neighborhood characteristics have predictable effects on errors in pharmacists' visual perception. Organizations that coin and evaluate drug names, as well as hospitals, pharmacies, and health systems, should consider these characteristics when assessing visually confusing names.

[1]  L. Kohn,et al.  To Err Is Human : Building a Safer Health System , 2007 .

[2]  P. L. Newbigging The perceptual redintegration of frequent and infrequent words. , 1961, Canadian journal of psychology.

[3]  J Grainger,et al.  Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: a multiple read-out model. , 1996, Psychological review.

[4]  D. Zagar,et al.  When WORDS with Higher-frequency Neighbours Become Words with No Higher-frequency Neighbour (Or How to Undress the Neighbourhood Frequency Effect) , 2000 .

[5]  L. Havens,et al.  The effect of competition on visual duration threshold and its independence of stimulus frequency. , 1963, Journal of experimental psychology.

[6]  Manuel Perea,et al.  The effects of orthographic neighborhood in reading and laboratory word identification tasks: A review , 2000 .

[7]  David B. Pisoni,et al.  Similarity neighborhoods of spoken words , 1991 .

[8]  J. Grainger,et al.  Effects of orthographic neighborhood in visual word recognition: cross-task comparisons. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[9]  P. L. Newbigging The perceptual redintegration of words which differ in connotative meaning. , 1961, Canadian journal of psychology.

[10]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Recognizing Spoken Words: The Neighborhood Activation Model , 1998, Ear and hearing.

[11]  A. Jacobs,et al.  Models of visual word recognition: Sampling the state of the art. , 1994 .

[12]  G. Dell,et al.  Lexical access in aphasic and nonaphasic speakers. , 1997, Psychological review.

[13]  Matthias Schroder,et al.  Logistic Regression: A Self-Learning Text , 2003 .

[14]  R. Solomon,et al.  Visual duration threshold as a function of word-probability. , 1951, Journal of experimental psychology.

[15]  R. Solomon,et al.  Frequency of usage as a determinant of recognition thresholds for words. , 1952, Journal of experimental psychology.

[16]  S. Andrews The effect of orthographic similarity on lexical retrieval: Resolving neighborhood conflicts , 1997 .

[17]  J Grainger,et al.  Neighborhood frequency effects in visual word recognition: A comparison of lexical decision and masked identification latencies , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[18]  Max Coltheart,et al.  Access to the internal lexicon , 1977 .

[19]  S. Mathey L'influence du voisinage orthographique lors de la reconnaissance des mots écrits. , 2001 .

[20]  B. Bergum,et al.  Attention and Performance VI , 1978 .

[21]  Matthew Flatt,et al.  PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers , 1993 .

[22]  R. Duncan Luce,et al.  Individual Choice Behavior , 1959 .

[23]  B L Lambert,et al.  Effect of orthographic and phonological similarity on false recognition of drug names. , 2001, Social science & medicine.

[24]  Bruce L. Lambert,et al.  Descriptive Analysis of the Drug Name Lexicon , 2001 .

[25]  James L. McClelland,et al.  An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. , 1981 .

[26]  David A. Balota,et al.  Visual Word Recognition: The Journey from Features to Meaning (A Travel Update) , 2006 .

[27]  David W. Hosmer,et al.  Applied Logistic Regression , 1991 .

[28]  D. Hedeker,et al.  MIXOR: a computer program for mixed-effects ordinal regression analysis. , 1996, Computer methods and programs in biomedicine.

[29]  A. Wall,et al.  Book ReviewTo Err is Human: building a safer health system Kohn L T Corrigan J M Donaldson M S Washington DC USA: Institute of Medicine/National Academy Press ISBN 0 309 06837 1 $34.95 , 2000 .

[30]  G. Keppel,et al.  Design and Analysis: A Researcher's Handbook , 1976 .

[31]  Graham A. Stephen String Searching Algorithms , 1994, Lecture Notes Series on Computing.

[32]  James L. McClelland,et al.  An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 2. The contextual enhancement effect and some tests and extensions of the model. , 1982, Psychological review.

[33]  R T Brodell,et al.  Prescription errors. Legibility and drug name confusion. , 1997, Archives of family medicine.

[34]  B L Lambert,et al.  Similarity as a risk factor in drug-name confusion errors: the look-alike (orthographic) and sound-alike (phonetic) model. , 1999, Medical care.

[35]  J G Snodgrass,et al.  Neighborhood effects in visual word recognition: Facilitatory or inhibitory? , 1993, Memory & cognition.

[36]  Steve Selvin,et al.  Statistical Analysis of Epidemiological Data , 1995 .

[37]  Joël Pynte,et al.  Reading as a Perceptual Process , 2000 .

[38]  Newbigging Pl The perceptual redintegration of frequent and infrequent words. , 1961 .

[39]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Basic processes in reading : visual word recognition , 1993 .

[40]  D. Hedeker,et al.  A random-effects ordinal regression model for multilevel analysis. , 1994, Biometrics.

[41]  J. W. Whitlow,et al.  The nature of word frequency effects on perceptual identification. , 1989 .

[42]  E. Pedhazur Multiple Regression in Behavioral Research: Explanation and Prediction , 1982 .

[43]  Gerry Altmann,et al.  Cognitive Models of Speech Processing: Psycholinguistic and Computational Perspectives - Workshop Overview , 1989, AI Mag..