Knowledge-Based Statistical Inference Method for Plan Quality Quantification

Aim: The aim of the study is to develop a geometrically adaptive and statistically robust plan quality inference method. Methods and Materials: We propose a knowledge-based plan quality inference method that references to similar plans in the historical database for patient-specific plan quality evaluation. First, a novel plan similarity metric with high-dimension geometrical difference quantification is utilized to retrieve similar plans. Subsequently, dosimetric statistical inferences are obtained from the selected similar plans. Two plan quality metrics—dosimetric result probability and dose deviation index—are proposed to quantify plan quality among prior similar plans. To evaluate the performance of the proposed method, we exported 927 clinically approved head and neck treatment plans. Eight organs at risk, including brain stem, cord, larynx, mandible, pharynx, oral cavity, left parotid and right parotid, were analyzed. Twelve suboptimal plans identified by dosimetric result probability were replanned to validate the capability of the proposed methods in identifying inferior plans. Results: After replanning, left and right parotid median doses are reduced by 31.7% and 18.2%, respectively; 83% of these cases would not be identified as suboptimal without the proposed similarity plan selection. Analysis of population plan quality reveals that average parotid sparing has been improving significantly over time (21.7% dosimetric result probability reduction from year 2006-2007 to year 2016-2017). Notably, the increasing dose sparing over time in retrospective plan quality analysis is strongly correlated with the increasing dose prescription ratios to the 2 planning targets, revealing the collective trend in planning conventions. Conclusions: The proposed similar plan retrieval and analysis methodology has been proven to be predictive of the current plan quality. Therefore, the proposed workflow can potentially be applied in the clinics as a real-time plan quality assurance tool. The proposed metrics can also serve the purpose of plan quality analytics in finding connections and historical trends in the clinical treatment planning workflow.

[1]  James M. Balter,et al.  Incorporating big data into treatment plan evaluation: Development of statistical DVH metrics and visualization dashboards , 2017, Advances in radiation oncology.

[2]  Sasa Mutic,et al.  Predicting dose-volume histograms for organs-at-risk in IMRT planning. , 2012, Medical physics.

[3]  B. Slotman,et al.  Evaluation of a knowledge-based planning solution for head and neck cancer. , 2015, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[4]  Luca Cozzi,et al.  On the pre-clinical validation of a commercial model-based optimisation engine: application to volumetric modulated arc therapy for patients with lung or prostate cancer. , 2014, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[5]  W. Ng,et al.  Comparison of Planning Quality and Efficiency Between Conventional and Knowledge-based Algorithms in Nasopharyngeal Cancer Patients Using Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy. , 2015, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[6]  B. Slotman,et al.  Effect of Dosimetric Outliers on the Performance of a Commercial Knowledge-Based Planning Solution. , 2016, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[7]  Luca Cozzi,et al.  A broad scope knowledge based model for optimization of VMAT in esophageal cancer: validation and assessment of plan quality among different treatment centers , 2015, Radiation Oncology.

[8]  Hao Wu,et al.  Applying a RapidPlan model trained on a technique and orientation to another: a feasibility and dosimetric evaluation , 2016, Radiation oncology.

[9]  Russell H. Taylor,et al.  Data-driven approach to generating achievable dose-volume histogram objectives in intensity-modulated radiotherapy planning. , 2011, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[10]  Andrew Jackson,et al.  Evaluating inter-campus plan consistency using a knowledge based planning model. , 2016, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[11]  Thorsten Dickhaus,et al.  Theory of Nonparametric Tests , 2018 .

[12]  Y. Ge,et al.  Quantitative analysis of the factors which affect the interpatient organ-at-risk dose sparing variation in IMRT plans. , 2012, Medical physics.

[13]  Raffaele Garofalo Building Enterprise Applications with Windows Presentation Foundation and the Model View ViewModel Pattern , 2011 .

[14]  Fang-Fang Yin,et al.  An Ensemble Approach to Knowledge-Based Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy Planning , 2018, Front. Oncol..

[15]  Yaorong Ge,et al.  Outlier identification in radiation therapy knowledge‐based planning: A study of pelvic cases , 2017, Medical physics.

[16]  B. Silverman Density estimation for statistics and data analysis , 1986 .

[17]  Ying Xiao,et al.  American Association of Physicists in Medicine Task Group 263: Standardizing Nomenclatures in Radiation Oncology , 2017, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[18]  Bernard W. Silverman,et al.  Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis , 1987 .

[19]  Fang-Fang Yin,et al.  A planning quality evaluation tool for prostate adaptive IMRT based on machine learning. , 2011, Medical physics.

[20]  D. Low,et al.  Experience-based quality control of clinical intensity-modulated radiotherapy planning. , 2011, International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics.

[21]  Steven F Petit,et al.  Independent knowledge-based treatment planning QA to audit Pinnacle autoplanning. , 2018, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[22]  Max Dahele,et al.  Can knowledge-based DVH predictions be used for automated, individualized quality assurance of radiotherapy treatment plans? , 2015, Radiation Oncology.

[23]  J. Lo,et al.  A knowledge-based approach to improving and homogenizing intensity modulated radiation therapy planning quality among treatment centers: an example application to prostate cancer planning. , 2013, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[24]  James Wheeler,et al.  Variation in external beam treatment plan quality: An inter-institutional study of planners and planning systems. , 2012, Practical radiation oncology.

[25]  Andrew Nisbet,et al.  Clinical validation and benchmarking of knowledge-based IMRT and VMAT treatment planning in pelvic anatomy. , 2016, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.