Coronary Catheterization and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in China: 10-Year Results From the China PEACE-Retrospective CathPCI Study.

IMPORTANCE The use of coronary catheterization and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is increasing in China, but, to date, there are no nationally representative assessments of the quality of care and outcomes in patients undergoing these procedures. OBJECTIVE To assess the quality of care and outcomes of patients undergoing coronary catheterization and PCI in China. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS In a clinical observational study (China PEACE [Patient-Centered Evaluative Assessment of Cardiac Events]-Retrospective CathPCI Study), we used a 2-stage, random sampling strategy to create a nationally representative sample of 11 241 patients undergoing coronary catheterization and PCI at 55 urban Chinese hospitals in calendar years 2001, 2006, and 2011. Data analysis was performed from July 11, 2014, to November 20, 2015. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Patient characteristics, treatment patterns, quality of care, and outcomes associated with these procedures and changes over time. RESULTS Of the 11 241 patients included in the study, the samples included, for 2001, 285 women (weighted percentage, 28.6%); for 2006, 826 women (weighted percentage, 32.2%), and for 2011, 2588 women (weighted percentage, 35.7%). Mean (SD) ages were 58 (8), 60 (11), and 61 (11) years, respectively. Between 2001 and 2011, estimated national rates of hospitalizations for coronary catheterization increased from 26 570 to 452 784 and for PCI, from 9678 to 208 954 (17-fold and 21-fold), respectively. More than half of stable patients undergoing coronary catheterization had nonobstructive coronary artery disease; this amount did not change significantly over time (2001: 60.3% [95% CI, 56.1%-64.5%]; 2011: 57.5% [95% CI, 55.8%-59.3%], P = .05 for trend). The proportion of PCI procedures performed via radial approach increased from 3.5% (95% CI, 1.7%-5.3%) in 2001 to 79.0% (95% CI, 77.7%-80.3%) in 2011 (P < . 001 for trend). The use of drug-eluting stents (DESs) increased from 18.0% (95% CI, 14.2%-21.7%) in 2001 to 97.3% (95% CI, 96.9%-97.7%) in 2011 (P < .001 for trend) largely owing to increased use of domestic DESs. The median length of stay decreased from 14 days (interquartile range [IQR], 9-20) in 2001 to 10 days (IQR, 7-14) in 2011 (P < .001 for trend). In-hospital mortality did not change significantly, but both adjusted risk of any bleeding (odds ratio [OR], 0.53 [95% CI, 0.36-0.79], P < .001 for trend) and access bleeding (OR, 0.23 [95% CI, 0.12-0.43], P < .001) were decreased between 2001 and 2011. The medical records lacked documentation needed to calculate commonly used process metrics including door to balloon times for primary PCI and the prescription of evidence-based medications at discharge. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Although the use of catheterization and PCI in China has increased dramatically, we identified critical quality and documentation gaps that represent opportunities to improve care. Our findings can serve as a foundation to guide future quality improvement initiatives in China.

[1]  C. Hanet,et al.  Impact of gender difference in hospital outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention. Results of the Belgian Working Group on Interventional Cardiology (BWGIC) registry. , 2016, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[2]  Shengshou Hu,et al.  Achieving best outcomes of patients with cardiovascular diseases in China by enhancing the quality of medical care and establishing a learning health care system , 2015, The Lancet.

[3]  R. Buechel,et al.  Non-invasive nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging improves the diagnostic yield of invasive coronary angiography. , 2015, European heart journal cardiovascular Imaging.

[4]  Z. Siudak,et al.  Temporal trends and patterns in percutaneous treatment of coronary artery disease in Poland in the years 2005-2011. , 2015, Kardiologia polska.

[5]  B. Wasan,et al.  Comparison of clinical efficacy and cost of a cardiac imaging strategy versus a traditional exercise test strategy for the investigation of patients with suspected stable coronary artery disease. , 2015, The American journal of cardiology.

[6]  Changsoo Kim,et al.  Changes in the Practice of Coronary Revascularization between 2006 and 2010 in the Republic of Korea , 2015, Yonsei medical journal.

[7]  J. Rumsfeld,et al.  State mandated public reporting and outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention in the United States. , 2015, The American journal of cardiology.

[8]  Harlan M Krumholz,et al.  ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in China from 2001 to 2011 (the China PEACE-Retrospective Acute Myocardial Infarction Study): a retrospective analysis of hospital data , 2015, The Lancet.

[9]  Mitchell W Krucoff,et al.  The Learning Curve for Transradial Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Among Operators in the United States: A Study From the National Cardiovascular Data Registry , 2014, Circulation.

[10]  Xinli Li,et al.  Success rate and safety of coronary angiography and angioplasty via radial artery approach among a Chinese population. , 2014, The Journal of invasive cardiology.

[11]  S. Normand,et al.  Protocol for the China PEACE (Patient-centered Evaluative Assessment of Cardiac Events) retrospective study of coronary catheterisation and percutaneous coronary intervention , 2014, BMJ Open.

[12]  C. Kobel,et al.  Austrian National CathLab Registry (ANCALAR): cardiac catheterization, coronary angiography (CA), and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in Austria during the year 2011 (Registry Data with Audit including 2012) , 2013, Wiener klinische Wochenschrift.

[13]  E. Guan,et al.  Clinical investigation of transradial access for emergent percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction , 2013, Clinical interventions in aging.

[14]  Sunil V. Rao,et al.  In-hospital outcomes of percutaneous coronary interventions in extremely obese and normal-weight patients: findings from the NCDR (National Cardiovascular Data Registry). , 2013, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[15]  John C. Messenger,et al.  Adoption of Radial Access and Comparison of Outcomes to Femoral Access in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: An Updated Report from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry (2007–2012) , 2013, Circulation.

[16]  Alan D. Lopez,et al.  Rapid health transition in China, 1990–2010: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010 , 2013, The Lancet.

[17]  J. Messenger,et al.  The NCDR CathPCI Registry: a US national perspective on care and outcomes for percutaneous coronary intervention , 2013, Heart.

[18]  J. Messenger,et al.  A contemporary view of diagnostic cardiac catheterization and percutaneous coronary intervention in the United States: a report from the CathPCI Registry of the National Cardiovascular Data Registry, 2010 through June 2011. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[19]  Sharon-Lise T Normand,et al.  Use of drug-eluting stents as a function of predicted benefit: clinical and economic implications of current practice. , 2012, Archives of internal medicine.

[20]  W. Shen Domestic coronary drug-eluting stents on a new horizon. , 2012, Chinese medical journal.

[21]  J. Spertus,et al.  ACCF/SCAI/STS/AATS/AHA/ASNC/HFSA/SCCT 2012 Appropriate use criteria for coronary revascularization focused update: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, Am , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[22]  Rajiv Gulati,et al.  Transradial arterial access for coronary and peripheral procedures: Executive summary by the transradial committee of the SCAI , 2011, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[23]  S. Normand,et al.  Predicting the Restenosis Benefit of Drug-Eluting Versus Bare Metal Stents in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , 2011, Circulation.

[24]  J. Messenger,et al.  Hospital variability in the rate of finding obstructive coronary artery disease at elective, diagnostic coronary angiography. , 2011, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[25]  Wei Li,et al.  Comparison of long-term clinical outcome after successful implantation of FIREBIRD and CYPHER sirolimus-eluting stents in daily clinical practice: analysis of a large single-center registry. , 2011, Chinese medical journal.

[26]  D. Kandzari,et al.  Transradial versus transfemoral method of percutaneous coronary revascularization for unprotected left main coronary artery disease: comparison of procedural and late-term outcomes. , 2010, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[27]  Y. Huo Current status and development of percutaneous coronary intervention in China , 2010, Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE B.

[28]  Elizabeth R DeLong,et al.  Contemporary mortality risk prediction for percutaneous coronary intervention: results from 588,398 procedures in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry. , 2010, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[29]  Dong Zhao,et al.  Future Cardiovascular Disease in China: Markov Model and Risk Factor Scenario Projections From the Coronary Heart Disease Policy Model–China , 2010, Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes.

[30]  Wei Li,et al.  Comparison of long-term clinical outcome after successful implantation of Firebird sirolimus- and Taxus paclitaxel-eluting stents in Chinese population: analysis of a large single center registry. , 2010, Chinese medical journal.

[31]  Pamela S Douglas,et al.  Low diagnostic yield of elective coronary angiography. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[32]  Sunil V. Rao,et al.  Bleeding in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The Development of a Clinical Risk Algorithm From the National Cardiovascular Data Registry , 2009, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions.

[33]  S. Anand,et al.  China's human resources for health: quantity, quality, and distribution , 2008, The Lancet.

[34]  Feilong Zhang,et al.  Firebird and cypher sirolimus-eluting stents and bare metal stents in treatment of very long coronary lesions. , 2008, Chinese medical journal.

[35]  B. Xu,et al.  [Effects of sirolimus-eluting stent and the paclitaxel-eluting stent: a three-year follow-up study]. , 2008, Zhonghua yi xue za zhi.