Mitigation of severe accidents for SFR and associated event sequence assessment

Abstract This article deals with the assessment of severe accident event sequence and mitigation strategy elaboration performed in the frame of ASTRID SFR Gen IV reactor project (Le Coz et al., 2013), including the Japanese/French collaboration involving JAEA, MFBR, Framatome and CEA. In the first part of the paper, the mitigation strategy and the approach defined for the design of mitigation features, which are transverse tubes called DCS-M-TT are presented. By considering 21 DCS-M-TTs into the core as defined at the end of the conceptual design, which enable to extract the core materials and to significantly reduce the core reactivity within the order of 10 s in some typical accidental conditions, the accidental power excursions in ASTRID should not lead to a significant mechanical energy release, thus ensuring the integrity of the main vessel. Nevertheless, some loading assumptions independent from event evolutions have been defined in order to design the main vessel and the core catcher in order to cover extreme accident consequences and to get rid of event sequence dependency when designing the reactor. Then, SIMMER-IV (3D) the main calculation results of ULOF simulations whose goal was to verify the DCS-M-TT efficiency and to support a PIRT are highlighted in the paper. They confirmed that fuel discharge through discharge tubes has a large mitigating impact on power excursions. The last part of this paper deals with an approach dedicated to the description of severe accident event sequences through generic event trees (GETs), which logically summarize the representative courses of accident progression showing relationship between critical causal events and major outcomes of the accidents. A set of trees has been elaborated for the description of each event sequence able to cause severe accidents (ULOF: unprotected loss of flow, UTOP: unprotected transient overpower and USAF: unprotected sub-assembly fault). The event-tree bifurcation points towards one branch or another of the possible event evolution could be examined alternatively with a help of phenomenological event chart (PECs). Afterwards, in association with the GET analysis, a PIRT (Phenomenon identification ranking table) on ULOF has been developed conjointly by Japanese and French sides in order to prioritize RD the primary phase, the short-term relocation phase, the expansion phase and the long-term relocation and cooling phase.

[1]  Werner Maschek,et al.  Investigation on upper bounds of recriticality energetics of hypothetical core disruptive accidents in sodium cooled fast reactors , 2018 .

[2]  Werner Maschek,et al.  Prevention and mitigation of severe accident developments and recriticalities in advanced fast reactor systems , 2011 .

[3]  Michel Quintard,et al.  Code Simulation of Quenching of a High Temperature Debris Bed: Model Improvement and Validation With Experimental Results , 2012 .

[4]  P. Chellapandi,et al.  Primary containment capacity of Prototype Fast Breeder Reactor against core disruptive accident loadings , 2013 .

[5]  K. Koyama,et al.  A scenario of core disruptive accident for Japan sodium-cooled fast reactor to achieve in-vessel retention , 2014 .

[6]  S. Guentay,et al.  European Expert Network for the Reduction of Uncertainties in Severe Accident Safety Issues (EURSAFE) , 2005 .

[7]  Amandine Marrel,et al.  A physical tool for severe accident mitigation studies , 2016 .

[8]  Jean-Marie Seiler,et al.  Physical tool for Unprotected Loss Of Flow transient simulations in a Sodium Fast Reactor , 2017 .

[9]  B. Carluec,et al.  Status of severe accident studies at the end of the conceptual design of ASTRID: Feedback on mitigation features , 2017 .

[10]  Shigenobu Kubo,et al.  ICONE23-1748 JSFR DESIGN PROGRESS RELATED TO DEVELOPMENT OF SAFETY DESIGN CRITERIA FOR GENERATION IV SODIUM-COOLED FAST REACTORS : (2) PROGRESS OF SAFETY DESIGN , 2015 .

[11]  J. M. Seiler,et al.  Comparison of the behaviour of two core designs for ASTRID in case of severe accidents , 2016 .

[12]  J. Seiler,et al.  Sodium-cooled fast reactor pin model for predicting pin failure during a power excursion , 2018, Nuclear Engineering and Design.

[13]  Bruno Raffin,et al.  Cache Aware Dynamics Data Layout for Efficient Shared Memory Parallelisation of EUROPLEXUS , 2016, ICCS.

[14]  M. Lance,et al.  Modeling and analysis of molten fuel vaporization and expansion for a sodium fast reactor severe accident , 2017 .

[15]  A. Bachrata,et al.  A three-dimensional neutronics – Thermalhydraulics Unprotected Loss of Flow simulation in Sodium-cooled Fast Reactor with mitigation devices , 2019, Nuclear Engineering and Design.

[16]  Albert B. Reynolds,et al.  Fast breeder reactors , 1981 .

[17]  Amandine Marrel,et al.  Physico-statistical approach to assess the core damage variability due to a total instantaneous blockage of SFR fuel sub-assembly , 2016 .