Evaluations of cloud properties of global and local cloud system resolving models using CALIPSO and CloudSat simulators

[1] This study proposes a method of using a local-area cloud system resolving model (LCRM) to evaluate and improve cloud properties simulated by a global cloud system resolving model (GCRM). We study the sensitivity to cloud microphysics schemes by comparing the simulated data of LCRM with CloudSat and Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observation (CALIPSO) using satellite simulators. In particular, the impacts of the improved cloud microphysics scheme, which is more comprehensive than the scheme used for the GCRM experiment, with six water categories are studied. We focus on the active convective phase over the maritime continent. During the 4 day integration period of LCRM, 11 tracks of A-Train satellite observations are available. Cloud properties along the cross sections of these tracks are first examined to find the bias of the simulated data compared to the CloudSat and CALIPSO observations. The improved cloud microphysics scheme used in the LCRM reproduces the overall characteristics of the observed contoured frequency by altitude diagrams (CFADs) well, although biases are still present in the upper layers. We find that the simulated domain-averaged cloud properties can be evaluated using the observed track data. The comparison of the CFADs between LCRM and GCRM clarifies the bias in GCRM, and the new cloud microphysics scheme improves this bias. Using LCRM, sensitivities to cloud microphysics parameters are examined, and the CFADs are further improved if the ice sedimentation speed is increased. These results indicate that introduction of the graupel category or faster sedimentation of ice clouds reduces the total amount of hydrometeors and leads to more efficiency of precipitation.

[1]  T. Nakajima,et al.  Wide-Area Determination of Cloud Microphysical Properties from NOAA AVHRR Measurements for FIRE and ASTEX Regions , 1995 .

[2]  H. D. Orville,et al.  Bulk Parameterization of the Snow Field in a Cloud Model , 1983 .

[3]  Z. Eitzen,et al.  A statistical comparison of deep convective cloud objects observed by an Earth Observing System satellite and simulated by a cloud-resolving model , 2005 .

[4]  Hirofumi Tomita,et al.  A new dynamical framework of nonhydrostatic global model using the icosahedral grid , 2004 .

[5]  George C. Craig,et al.  Sensitivity of Tropical Convection to Sea Surface Temperature in the Absence of Large-Scale Flow , 1999 .

[6]  F. Guichard,et al.  A gcss model intercomparison for a tropical squall line observed during toga‐coare. I: Cloud‐resolving models , 2000 .

[7]  C. Bretherton,et al.  A Test of the Simulation of Tropical Convective Cloudiness by a Cloud-Resolving Model , 2009 .

[8]  S. Bony,et al.  Use of CALIPSO lidar observations to evaluate the cloudiness simulated by a climate model , 2008 .

[9]  Andrew J. Heymsfield,et al.  A scheme for parameterizing ice cloud water content in general circulation models , 1990 .

[10]  Kazuo Saito,et al.  The Operational JMA Nonhydrostatic Mesoscale Model , 2006 .

[11]  W. Grabowski.  Toward Cloud Resolving Modeling of Large-Scale Tropical Circulations: A Simple Cloud Microphysics Parameterization , 1998 .

[12]  Shu‐Hua Chen,et al.  A One-dimensional Time Dependent Cloud Model , 2002 .

[13]  D. Randall,et al.  Climate models and their evaluation , 2007 .

[14]  D. Winker,et al.  Initial performance assessment of CALIOP , 2007 .

[15]  J. Dudhia,et al.  A Revised Approach to Ice Microphysical Processes for the Bulk Parameterization of Clouds and Precipitation , 2004 .

[16]  R. Houze,et al.  Three-Dimensional Kinematic and Microphysical Evolution of Florida Cumulonimbus. Part II: Frequency Distributions of Vertical Velocity, Reflectivity, and Differential Reflectivity , 1995 .

[17]  Damian R. Wilson,et al.  Evaluating cloud systems in the Met Office global forecast model using simulated CloudSat radar reflectivities , 2008 .

[18]  H. Niino,et al.  An Improved Mellor–Yamada Level-3 Model with Condensation Physics: Its Design and Verification , 2004 .

[19]  S. J. Weiss,et al.  Some Practical Considerations Regarding Horizontal Resolution in the First Generation of Operational Convection-Allowing NWP , 2008 .

[20]  J. Janowiak,et al.  A Real–Time Global Half–Hourly Pixel–Resolution Infrared Dataset and Its Applications , 2001 .

[21]  Hirohiko Masunaga,et al.  A joint satellite and global cloud‐resolving model analysis of a Madden‐Julian Oscillation event: Model diagnosis , 2008 .

[22]  Hiroaki Miura,et al.  Precipitation Statistics Comparison Between Global Cloud Resolving Simulation with NICAM and TRMM PR Data , 2008 .

[23]  Q. Fu,et al.  Improvements of an ice-phase microphysics parameterization for use in numerical simulations of tropical convection , 1995 .

[24]  H. Tomita,et al.  Importance of the subgrid-scale turbulent moist process: Cloud distribution in global cloud-resolving simulations , 2010 .

[25]  Peter V. Hobbs,et al.  The Mesoscale and Microscale Structure and Organization of Clouds and Precipitation in Midlatitude Cyclones. XII: A Diagnostic Modeling Study of Precipitation Development in Narrow Cold-Frontal Rainbands , 1984 .

[26]  E. O'connor,et al.  The CloudSat mission and the A-train: a new dimension of space-based observations of clouds and precipitation , 2002 .

[27]  Hiroaki Miura,et al.  A Madden-Julian Oscillation Event Realistically Simulated by a Global Cloud-Resolving Model , 2007, Science.

[28]  H. Tomita,et al.  A global cloud‐resolving simulation: Preliminary results from an aqua planet experiment , 2005 .

[29]  M. Rodwell,et al.  Toward Seamless Prediction: Calibration of Climate Change Projections Using Seasonal Forecasts , 2008 .

[30]  Y. Tsushima,et al.  Modeling of the radiative process in an atmospheric general circulation model. , 2000, Applied optics.

[31]  M. Satoh,et al.  Multi-scale Organization of Convection in a Global Numerical Simulation of the December 2006 MJO Event Using Explicit Moist Processes , 2009 .

[32]  M. Satoh,et al.  Statistics on High-Cloud Areas and Their Sensitivities to Cloud Microphysics Using Single-Cloud Experiments , 2009 .

[33]  B. Wielicki,et al.  Statistical analyses of satellite cloud object data from ceres. Part III: Comparison with cloud-resolving model simulations of tropical convective clouds , 2007 .

[34]  Minghua Zhang,et al.  An intercomparison of cloud‐resolving models with the atmospheric radiation measurement summer 1997 intensive observation period data , 2002 .

[35]  Alexander Khain,et al.  Microphysics, Radiation and Surface Processes in the Goddard Cumulus Ensemble (GCE) Model , 2003 .

[36]  Masaki Satoh,et al.  Nonhydrostatic icosahedral atmospheric model (NICAM) for global cloud resolving simulations , 2008, J. Comput. Phys..

[37]  Hiroaki Miura,et al.  Comparison of high-level clouds represented in a global cloud system–resolving model with CALIPSO/CloudSat and geostationary satellite observations , 2010 .

[38]  Z. Eitzen,et al.  Sensitivity of a Large Ensemble of Tropical Convective Systems to Changes in the Thermodynamic and Dynamic Forcings , 2008 .

[39]  S. Bony,et al.  Comparing clouds and their seasonal variations in 10 atmospheric general circulation models with satellite measurements , 2005 .

[40]  Simone Tanelli,et al.  CloudSat mission: Performance and early science after the first year of operation , 2008 .

[41]  Kazumasa Aonashi,et al.  Verification of Hydrometeor Properties Simulated by a Cloud-Resolving Model Using a Passive Microwave Satellite and Ground-Based Radar Observations for a Rainfall System Associated with the Baiu Front , 2009 .

[42]  Hiroaki Miura,et al.  Diurnal Cycle of Precipitation in the Tropics Simulated in a Global Cloud-Resolving Model , 2009 .

[43]  T. Segawa,et al.  Nonhydrostatic Atmospheric Models and Operational Development at JMA , 2007 .

[44]  Hirofumi Tomita,et al.  A Stretched Icosahedral Grid by a New Grid Transformation , 2008 .

[45]  Hiroaki Miura,et al.  Characteristics of Cloud Size of Deep Convection Simulated by a Global Cloud Resolving Model over the Western Tropical Pacific( The International Workshop on High-Resolution and Cloud Modeling, 2006) , 2008 .

[46]  Hiroaki Miura,et al.  Global cloud‐system‐resolving model NICAM successfully simulated the lifecycles of two real tropical cyclones , 2008 .

[47]  Hirofumi Tomita,et al.  New Microphysical Schemes with Five and Six Categories by Diagnostic Generation of Cloud Ice , 2008 .

[48]  Richard H. Johnson,et al.  Trimodal Characteristics of Tropical Convection , 1999 .

[49]  Teruyuki Nakajima,et al.  A k-distribution-based radiation code and its computational optimization for an atmospheric general circulation model , 2008 .

[50]  A. Lacis,et al.  Near-Global Survey of Effective Droplet Radii in Liquid Water Clouds Using ISCCP Data. , 1994 .

[51]  John M. Haynes,et al.  A Multipurpose Radar Simulation Package: QuickBeam , 2007 .