Bioremediation of petroleum hydrocarbons in contaminated soils: comparison of biosolids addition, carbon supplementation, and monitored natural attenuation.

Two methods of biostimulation were compared in a laboratory incubation study with monitored natural attenuation (MNA) for total petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH) degradation in diesel-contaminated Tarpley clay soil with low carbon content. One method utilized rapid-release inorganic fertilizers rich in N and P, and the other used sterilized, slow-release biosolids, which added C in addition to N and P. After 8 weeks of incubation, both biostimulation methods degraded approximately 96% of TPH compared to MNA, which degraded 93.8%. However, in the first week of incubation, biosolids-amended soils showed a linear two orders of magnitude increase in microbial population compared to MNA, whereas, in the fertilizer-amended soils, only a one order of magnitude increase was noted. In the following weeks, microbial population in the fertilizer-amended soils dropped appreciably, suggesting a toxic effect owing to fertilizer-induced acidity and/or NH(3) overdosing. Results suggest that biosolids addition is a more effective soil amendment method for biostimulation than the commonly practiced inorganic fertilizer application, because of the abilities of biosolids to supplement carbon. No statistically significant difference was observed between the biostimulation methods and MNA, suggesting that MNA can be a viable remediation strategy in certain soils with high native microbial population.

[1]  Thomas M. Pankratz.  Environmental Engineering Dictionary and Directory , 2000 .

[2]  R. Bartha,et al.  Effect of environmental parameters on the biodegradation of oil sludge , 1979, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[3]  F. Schinner,et al.  Laboratory bioremediation experiments with soil from a diesel‐oil contaminated site—significant role of cold‐adapted microorganisms and fertilizers , 1997 .

[4]  A. Klute.  Methods of soil analysis. Part 1. Physical and mineralogical methods. , 1988 .

[5]  W. Jackson,et al.  Potential for Enhancement of Biodegradation of Crude Oil in Louisiana Salt Marshes using Nutrient Amendments , 1999 .

[6]  R. Mikkelsen,et al.  The use of poultry litter as co-substrate and source of inorganic nutrients and microorganisms for the ex situ biodegradation of petroleum compounds. , 1999, Poultry science.

[7]  N. Vasudevan,et al.  Bioremediation of oil sludge-contaminated soil. , 2001, Environment international.

[8]  F. Schinner,et al.  Bioremediation (Natural Attenuation and Biostimulation) of Diesel-Oil-Contaminated Soil in an Alpine Glacier Skiing Area , 2001, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[9]  R. Crawford,et al.  Effects of oxygen, nitrogen, and temperature on gasoline biodegradation in soil , 1995, Biodegradation.

[10]  D. Reinhart,et al.  Bioremediation of Diesel Contaminated Soil Using Biopiles , 1997 .

[11]  Y. Ting,et al.  Bioremediation of petroleum hydrocarbons in soil microcosms , 1999 .

[12]  D. Pinelli,et al.  Bioremediation of a soil contaminated by hydrocarbon mixtures: the residual concentration problem. , 2000, Chemosphere.

[13]  M. Huesemann,et al.  Compositional changes during landfarming of weathered michigan crude oil‐contaminated soii , 1993 .

[14]  M. McBride,et al.  Toxic metals in sewage sludge-amended soils: has promotion of beneficial use discounted the risks? , 2003 .

[15]  S. Matsumoto,et al.  Laboratory-scale bioremediation of oil-contaminated soil of Kuwait with soil amendment materials. , 1997, Chemosphere.

[16]  Joon-Seok Park,et al.  Bioremediation of diesel-contaminated soil with composting. , 2002, Environmental pollution.

[17]  D. Balkwill,et al.  Morphological and cultural comparison of microorganisms in surface soil and subsurface sediments at a pristine study site in Oklahoma , 1988, Microbial Ecology.

[18]  H. Wells,et al.  Multi-Species Ecotoxicity Assessment of Petroleum-Contaminated Soil , 2003 .

[19]  J. Walworth,et al.  Bioremediation of a Petroleum-Contaminated Cryic Soil: Effects of Phosphorus, Nitrogen, and Temperature , 1995 .

[20]  B. Everitt.  The Cambridge Dictionary of Statistics , 1998 .

[21]  P. Collin.  Dictionary of ecology and the environment , 1988 .

[22]  J. F. McNabb,et al.  Enumeration and Characterization of Bacteria Indigenous to a Shallow Water-Table Aquifer , 1983 .

[23]  D. Balkwill,et al.  Characterization of Subsurface Bacteria Associated with Two Shallow Aquifers in Oklahoma , 1985, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[24]  Masataka Watanabe,et al.  Crude oil bioremediation field experiment in the Sea of Japan. , 2003, Marine pollution bulletin.

[25]  C. Batte.  Soil Survey of Comal and Hays Counties, Texas , 1984 .

[26]  E. Ron,et al.  Petroleum bioremediation — a multiphase problem , 1992, Biodegradation.

[27]  K. Y. Li,et al.  Bioremediation of oil-contaminated soil — A rate model , 1995 .

[28]  Frederick S. Colwell,et al.  Microbiological Comparison of Surface Soil and Unsaturated Subsurface Soil from a Semiarid High Desert , 1989, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[29]  Eve Riser-Roberts,et al.  Remediation of Petroleum Contaminated Soils: Biological, Physical, and Chemical Processes , 1998 .

[30]  E. B. Wedebye,et al.  Inhibitory effects on degradation of diesel oil in soil-microcosms by a commercial bioaugmentation product , 1995, Bulletin of environmental contamination and toxicology.

[31]  T. Cutright,et al.  The investigation of enhanced bioremediation through the addition of macro and micro nutrients in a PAH contaminated soil , 1999 .

[32]  J. Speight.  Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons , 2005 .