Bayesian reconstructions from emission tomography data using a modified EM algorithm.

A novel method of reconstruction from single-photon emission computerized tomography data is proposed. This method builds on the expectation-maximization (EM) approach to maximum likelihood reconstruction from emission tomography data, but aims instead at maximum posterior probability estimation, which takes account of prior belief about smoothness in the isotope concentration. A novel modification to the EM algorithm yields a practical method. The method is illustrated by an application to data from brain scans.

[1]  I. Good Nonparametric roughness penalties for probability densities , 1971 .

[2]  P. McCullagh,et al.  Generalized Linear Models , 1972, Predictive Analytics.

[3]  H. Walker,et al.  An iterative procedure for obtaining maximum-likelihood estimates of the parameters for a mixture of normal distributions , 1978 .

[4]  Ronald J. Jaszczak,et al.  SPECT: Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[5]  R. Jaszczak,et al.  SPECT: Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography , 1980 .

[6]  L. Shepp,et al.  Maximum Likelihood Reconstruction for Emission Tomography , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[7]  Donald Geman,et al.  Stochastic Relaxation, Gibbs Distributions, and the Bayesian Restoration of Images , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[8]  K. Lange,et al.  EM reconstruction algorithms for emission and transmission tomography. , 1984, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[9]  Michael I. Miller,et al.  The Use of Sieves to Stabilize Images Produced with the EM Algorithm for Emission Tomography , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[10]  L. Shepp,et al.  A Statistical Model for Positron Emission Tomography , 1985 .

[11]  Kimberlee J. Kearfott Comment: Practical Considerations , 1985 .

[12]  R. Jaszczak,et al.  Inverse Monte Carlo: A Unified Reconstruction Algorithm for SPECT , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[13]  Robert M. Lewitt,et al.  Accelerated Iterative Reconstruction for Positron Emission Tomography Based on the EM Algorithm for Maximum Likelihood Estimation , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[14]  J. Besag On the Statistical Analysis of Dirty Pictures , 1986 .

[15]  Stuart Geman,et al.  Statistical methods for tomographic image reconstruction , 1987 .

[16]  Bernard W. Silverman,et al.  Speed of Estimation in Positron Emission Tomography , 1987 .

[17]  E. Veklerov,et al.  Stopping Rule for the MLE Algorithm Based on Statistical Hypothesis Testing , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[18]  Linda Kaufman,et al.  Implementing and Accelerating the EM Algorithm for Positron Emission Tomography , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[19]  Eiichi Tanaka A Fast Reconstruction Algorthm for Stationary Positron Emission Tomography Based on a Modified EM Algorithm , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[20]  E. Levitan,et al.  A Maximum a Posteriori Probability Expectation Maximization Algorithm for Image Reconstruction in Emission Tomography , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[21]  K. Lange,et al.  A Theoretical Study of Some Maximum Likelihood Algorithms for Emission and Transmission Tomography , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[22]  E. Veklerov,et al.  MLE reconstruction of a brain phantom using a Monte Carlo transition matrix and a statistical stopping rule , 1988 .

[23]  J. D. Wilson,et al.  A smoothed EM approach to indirect estimation problems, with particular reference to stereology and emission tomography , 1990 .

[24]  D. Nychka Some properties of adding a smoothing step to the EM algorithm , 1990 .

[25]  Bernard W. Silverman,et al.  Speed of Estimation in Positron Emission Tomography and Related Inverse Problems , 1990 .

[26]  P. Green On Use of the EM Algorithm for Penalized Likelihood Estimation , 1990 .

[27]  L. Shepp,et al.  New Insights into Emission Tomography Via Linear Programming , 1992 .

[28]  R. A. Gaskins,et al.  Nonparametric roughness penalties for probability densities , 2022 .