Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research

This study examines the evidence for the effectiveness of active learning. It defines the common forms of active learning most relevant for engineering faculty and critically examines the core element of each method. It is found that there is broad but uneven support for the core elements of active, collaborative, cooperative and problem-based learning.

[1]  A. Chickering,et al.  Seven Principles for Good Practice in Undergraduate Education , 1987, CORE.

[2]  Henk G. Schmidt,et al.  The psychological basis of problem-based learning , 1985 .

[3]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis , 1992 .

[4]  E. Paice,et al.  Collaborative learning , 2003, Medical education.

[5]  Leonard Springer,et al.  Effects of Small-Group Learning on Undergraduates in Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology: A Meta-Analysis , 1997 .

[6]  Phillip C. Wankat The effective, efficient professor , 2001 .

[7]  M. Lipsey,et al.  The efficacy of psychological, educational, and behavioral treatment. Confirmation from meta-analysis. , 1993, American Psychologist.

[8]  J. Colliver Effectiveness of Problem‐based Learning Curricula: Research and Theory , 2000, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[9]  G R Norman,et al.  Effectiveness of problem‐based learning curricula: theory, practice and paper darts , 2000, Medical education.

[10]  Kim L. Siegenthaler,et al.  Phillip C. Wankat. The Effective, Efficient Professor — Teaching, Scholarship and Service , 2003 .

[11]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Cooperative Learning Returns To College What Evidence Is There That It Works , 1998 .

[12]  Theodore Panitz,et al.  The Case for Student Centered Instruction via Collaborative Learning Paradigms. , 1999 .

[13]  Barbara J. Millis,et al.  Cooperative Learning for Higher Education Faculty , 1997 .

[14]  Thomas C. Taveggia,et al.  The teaching-learning paradox : a comparative analysis of college teaching methods , 1968 .

[15]  Richard M. Felder,et al.  The Future of Engineering Education: Part 2. Teaching Methods That Work. , 2000 .

[16]  Gerald W. Lott The effect of inquiry teaching and advance organizers upon student outcomes in science education , 1983 .

[17]  Karl A. Smith,et al.  Strategies for energizing large classes : from small groups to learning communities , 2000 .

[18]  R. Hake Interactive-engagement vs Traditional Methods in Mechanics Instruction* , 1998 .

[19]  John M. Parente,et al.  Collaborative Learning vs. Lecture/Discussion: Students' Reported Learning Gains * , 2001 .

[20]  M. Albanese,et al.  Problem‐based Learning: A Review of Literature on Its Outcomes and Implementation Issues , 1993, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[21]  樊希强,et al.  Cooperative Learning , 2020, Teaching High School Physics.

[22]  C. Bonwell,et al.  Active learning : creating excitement in the classroom , 1991 .

[23]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Cooperation and Competition: Theory and Research , 1989 .

[24]  Theodore Panitz,et al.  Collaborative versus Cooperative Learning: A Comparison of the Two Concepts Which Will Help Us Understand the Underlying Nature of Interactive Learning. , 1999 .

[25]  Gerald W. Bracey Tips for Readers of Research: Beware the ‘Classic Study’ , 2002 .

[26]  Jeffery M. Saul,et al.  On the effectiveness of active-engagement microcomputer-based laboratories , 1997 .

[27]  G. Wiggins,et al.  Understanding by Design , 1998 .

[28]  Charles A. Hughes,et al.  Using the Pause Procedure to Enhance Lecture Recall , 1987 .

[29]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Active Learning: Cooperation in the College Classroom , 2006 .

[30]  Elaine Fredericksen Minority Students and the Learning Community Experience: A Cluster Experiment. , 1998 .

[31]  A. Astin What matters in college? : four critical years revisited , 1994 .

[32]  Shelagh A. Gallagher,et al.  Problem-Based Learning: Where Did it Come from, What Does it Do, and Where is it Going? , 1997 .

[33]  P. Feden,et al.  Methods of teaching : applying cognitive science to promote student learning , 2003 .

[34]  R. Slavin Cooperative Learning (Research on teaching monograph series) , 1983 .

[35]  R. Stahl The Essential Elements of Cooperative Learning in the Classroom. ERIC Digest. , 1994 .

[36]  Richard M. Felder,et al.  THE FUTURE OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION II. TEACHING METHODS THAT WORK , 2000 .

[37]  D. T. Vernon,et al.  Does problem‐based learning work? A meta‐analysis of evaluative research , 1993, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[38]  M. D. Sorcinelli Research findings on the seven principles , 1991 .

[39]  Claire Howell Major,et al.  Assessing the Effectiveness of Problem-Based Learning in Higher Education: Lessons from the Literature , 2001 .

[40]  Scott B. Watson,et al.  The Essential Elements of Cooperative Learning. , 1992 .

[41]  J. Hartley,et al.  Note‐taking: A critical review , 1978 .

[42]  Wilbert J. McKeachie,et al.  Research on College Teaching. , 1972 .

[43]  Lemuel Berry Collaborative Learning: A Program for Improving the Retention of Minority Students. , 1991 .

[44]  Francis J. Di Vesta,et al.  The pausing principle: Increasing the efficiency of memory for ongoing events , 1979 .

[45]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Cooperative Versus Competitive Efforts and Problem Solving , 1995 .

[46]  D Mårtenson,et al.  Medical chemistry: evaluation of active and problem‐oriented teaching methods , 1985, Medical education.

[47]  Richard M. Felder,et al.  THE FUTURE OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION III. DEVELOPING CRITICAL SKILLS , 2000 .

[48]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Statistical Power Analysis For The Behavioral Sciences Revised Edition , 1987 .

[49]  M. Albanese,et al.  Problem‐based learning: why curricula are likely to show little effect on knowledge and clinical skills , 2000, Medical education.

[50]  C. Bonwell,et al.  Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom. ERIC Digest. , 1991 .

[51]  K. Bruffee Sharing Our Toys: Cooperative Learning Versus Collaborative Learning , 1995 .