SIFT : Multi Physiological Signal Feature Correlation-based Sensor Compromise Detection in Body Sensor Networks

A Body Sensor Network (BSN) consists of a set of sensing devices deployed on a user (patient) typically for health monitoring purposes.The fact that BSNs provide sensitive information to caregivers about the user’s health makes them attractive targets for tech-criminals to exploit. In this work, we focus on BSN sensor compromise detection especially in the cases physiological signal monitoring sensors. A compromised sensor may generate erroneous data which may cause the incorrect interpretation of user health leading to wrong diagnosis and treatment. Detecting sensor compromise is a non-trivial task in BSNs. Traditional sensor compromise detection relies on one of two general techniques: (1) using redundant sensors and some form of voting to determine sensor accuracy, or (2) using past sensor values for predicting the expected current sensor value range. However, in a BSN due to usability limitations we cannot expect the presence of redundant physiological sensors of the same kind. Further, the dynamic nature of the human body precludes the reliance on historical sensor values for predicting the current range of values. In this paper, we present SIFT, a novel methodology to address the problem of sensor compromise without relying on either redundant sensors or historical sensor values. SIFT leverages the fact that in BSNs physiological signals based on the same underlying physiological process (e.g., cardiac process) are inherently correlated i.e., they share similar features with each other. Given this group of correlated signals, any unnatural alteration in one of the correlated signal will not be reflected in the other signals in the group. As SIFT uses signals from multiple sensors it does not require node redundant sensors. Further, as the correlated signals are measured in a synchronous fashion, the current state of the patient’s physiology is automatically taken into account, thus overcoming a typical problem with relying on techniques that use past sensor values. We illustrate the operation of SIFT through a case study where we detect the compromise of a electrocardiogram (ECG) sensor using two related signals arterial blood pressure (ABP) and respiration (RESP) sensors as reference. Analysis of our case study demonstrates promising results with over 98% accuracy in detecting even subtle ECG signal alterations for both healthy and unhealthy patients.

[1]  A. Malliani,et al.  Heart rate variability. Standards of measurement, physiological interpretation, and clinical use , 1996 .

[2]  Jeffrey M. Hausdorff,et al.  Physionet: Components of a New Research Resource for Complex Physiologic Signals". Circu-lation Vol , 2000 .

[3]  Patrick E. McSharry,et al.  A dynamical model for generating synthetic electrocardiogram signals , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[4]  Arun Somani,et al.  Distributed fault detection of wireless sensor networks , 2006, DIWANS '06.

[5]  G. Clifford,et al.  Models for ECG and RR Interval Processes , 2007 .

[6]  M. Sharifi,et al.  A trust-based distributed data fault detection algorithm for wireless sensor networks , 2008, 2008 11th International Conference on Computer and Information Technology.

[7]  Li Li,et al.  Sensor fault detection in wireless sensor networks , 2009 .

[8]  Peng Jiang,et al.  A New Method for Node Fault Detection in Wireless Sensor Networks , 2009, Sensors.

[9]  Ayan Banerjee,et al.  PSKA: Usable and Secure Key Agreement Scheme for Body Area Networks , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[10]  Sandeep K. S. Gupta,et al.  Physiological value-based efficient usable security solutions for body sensor networks , 2010, TOSN.

[11]  Ricardo Chavarriaga,et al.  Detecting and Rectifying Anomalies in Body Sensor Networks , 2011, 2011 International Conference on Body Sensor Networks.

[12]  Ayan Banerjee,et al.  GeM-REM: Generative Model-Driven Resource Efficient ECG Monitoring in Body Sensor Networks , 2011, 2011 International Conference on Body Sensor Networks.

[13]  B. Prabhakaran,et al.  Motion fault detection and isolation in Body Sensor Networks , 2011, Pervasive Mob. Comput..

[14]  Pabitra Mohan Khilar,et al.  Fault Diagnosis in Body Sensor Networks , 2012 .

[15]  B. Prabhakaran,et al.  Fault detection and isolation in motion monitoring system , 2012, 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[16]  Mohammad Hajibegloo,et al.  Fast fault detection in wireless sensor networks , 2012, 2012 Second International Conference on Digital Information and Communication Technology and it's Applications (DICTAP).

[17]  Giancarlo Fortino,et al.  Embedded self-healing layer for detecting and recovering sensor faults in body sensor networks , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC).

[18]  Ayan Banerjee,et al.  PEES: physiology-based end-to-end security for mHealth , 2013, Wireless Health.

[19]  Insup Lee,et al.  Prediction of Significant Vasospasm in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Using Automated Data , 2014, Neurocritical Care.