Place versus response learning revisited: tests of blocking on the radial maze.

Neurobiological and behavioral research indicates that place learning and response learning occur simultaneously, in parallel. Such findings seem to conflict with theories of associative learning in which different cues compete for learning. The authors conducted place+response training on a radial maze and then tested place learning and response learning separately by reconfiguring the maze in various ways. Consistent with the effects of manipulating place and response systems in the brain (M. G. Packard & J. L. McGaugh, 1996), well-trained rats showed strong place learning and strong response learning. Three experiments using associative blocking paradigms indicated that prior response learning interferes with place learning. Blocking and related tests can be used to better understand how memory systems interact during learning.

[1]  N. J. Mackintosh,et al.  Blocking and Overshadowing between Intra-Maze and Extra-Maze Cues: A Test of the Independence of Locale and Guidance Learning , 1985 .

[2]  R. Kesner,et al.  Memory for spatial locations, motor responses, and objects: triple dissociation among the hippocampus, caudate nucleus, and extrastriate visual cortex , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[3]  Edward L. Bennett,et al.  Neural mechanisms of learning and memory , 1977 .

[4]  N. Mackintosh Animal learning and cognition , 1994 .

[5]  M. Packard Glutamate infused posttraining into the hippocampus or caudate-putamen differentially strengthens place and response learning. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  L. H. Hicks Effects of Overtraining on Acquisition and Reversal of Place and Response Learning , 1964 .

[7]  P. E. Gold,et al.  Switching Memory Systems during Learning: Changes in Patterns of Brain Acetylcholine Release in the Hippocampus and Striatum in Rats , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[8]  Jane A. Mitchell,et al.  Caudate-Putamen Lesions in the Rat may Impair or Potentiate Maze Learning Depending upon Availability of Stimulus Cues and Relevance of Response Cues , 1988, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology.

[9]  R. J. McDonald,et al.  Multiple Parallel Memory Systems in the Brain of the Rat , 2002, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory.

[10]  W. Schultz,et al.  Dopamine responses comply with basic assumptions of formal learning theory , 2001, Nature.

[11]  Paul E. Gold,et al.  Intra-hippocampal lidocaine injections impair acquisition of a place task and facilitate acquisition of a response task in rats , 2003, Behavioural Brain Research.

[12]  C. Gallistel The organization of learning , 1990 .

[13]  M. Fanselow Learning theory and neuropsychology: Configuring their disparate elements in the hippocampus. , 1999 .

[14]  Mark G Packard,et al.  Post‐training reversible inactivation of hippocampus reveals interference between memory systems , 2002, Hippocampus.

[15]  L. Nadel,et al.  The Hippocampus as a Cognitive Map , 1978 .

[16]  R. J. McDonald,et al.  Hippocampal and nonhippocampal contributions to place learning in rats. , 1995, Behavioral neuroscience.

[17]  N. Mackintosh,et al.  Loss of control by a less valid or by a less salient stimulus compounded with a better predictor of reinforcement , 1977 .

[18]  B. Knowlton,et al.  Effects of US devaluation on win-stay and win-shift radial maze performance in rats. , 2000, Behavioral neuroscience.

[19]  V. D. Chamizo Acquisition of Knowledge about Spatial Location: Assessing the Generality of the Mechanism of Learning , 2003, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology.

[20]  J. Pearce,et al.  Interaction between piloting and beacon homing by rats in a swimming pool. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[21]  Marcia L. Spetch,et al.  Mechanisms of landmark use in mammals and birds. , 1998 .

[22]  P. Holland Brain mechanisms for changes in processing of conditioned stimuli in Pavlovian conditioning: Implications for behavior theory , 1997 .

[23]  K. Haberlandt,et al.  Stimulus selection in animal discrimination learning. , 1968, Journal of experimental psychology.

[24]  S. Healy Spatial representation in animals. , 1998 .

[25]  V. Lolordo,et al.  Failure to block control by a relevant stimulus , 1982 .

[26]  R. J. McDonald,et al.  Parallel information processing in the water maze: evidence for independent memory systems involving dorsal striatum and hippocampus. , 1994, Behavioral and neural biology.

[27]  M. Packard,et al.  Differential effects of fornix and caudate nucleus lesions on two radial maze tasks: evidence for multiple memory systems , 1989, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[28]  Geoffrey Hall CHAPTER 2 – Pavlovian Conditioning: Laws of Association , 1994 .

[29]  L. Kamin Predictability, surprise, attention, and conditioning , 1967 .

[30]  N. Mackintosh Overshadowing and stimulus intensity , 1976, Animal learning & behavior.

[31]  Brett M Gibson,et al.  Competition among spatial cues in a naturalistic food-carrying task , 2003, Learning & behavior.

[32]  Sara J Shettleworth,et al.  The geometric module in the rat: independence of shape and feature learning in a food finding task , 2004, Learning & behavior.

[33]  R. Poldrack,et al.  Competition among multiple memory systems: converging evidence from animal and human brain studies , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[34]  J. Pearce,et al.  Blocking in the Morris swimming pool. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[35]  R. Rescorla,et al.  A theory of Pavlovian conditioning : Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement , 1972 .

[36]  E. Maguire,et al.  The Well-Worn Route and the Path Less Traveled Distinct Neural Bases of Route Following and Wayfinding in Humans , 2003, Neuron.

[37]  J. D. McGaugh,et al.  Inactivation of Hippocampus or Caudate Nucleus with Lidocaine Differentially Affects Expression of Place and Response Learning , 1996, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory.

[38]  Ralph R. Miller,et al.  Assessment of the Rescorla-Wagner model. , 1995 .

[39]  R. Morris Spatial Localization Does Not Require the Presence of Local Cues , 1981 .

[40]  S. Killcross,et al.  Coordination of actions and habits in the medial prefrontal cortex of rats. , 2003, Cerebral cortex.

[41]  Raymond P. Kesner,et al.  Double dissociation of egocentric and allocentric space following medial prefrontal and parietal cortex lesions in the rat. , 1989 .

[42]  M. Holahan,et al.  Involuntary, unreinforced (pure) spatial learning is impaired by fimbria‐fornix but not by dorsal hippocampus lesions , 2003, Hippocampus.

[43]  R. J. McDonald,et al.  Circadian rhythms, aging and memory , 2000, Behavioural Brain Research.

[44]  R Biegler,et al.  Blocking in the spatial domain with arrays of discrete landmarks. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[45]  S. Shettleworth Cognition, evolution, and behavior , 1998 .

[46]  S. Killcross,et al.  Inactivation of the infralimbic prefrontal cortex reinstates goal-directed responding in overtrained rats , 2003, Behavioural Brain Research.

[47]  J Ward-Robinson,et al.  Influence of a beacon on spatial learning based on the shape of the test environment. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[48]  Jeansok J Kim,et al.  Multiple brain-memory systems: the whole does not equal the sum of its parts , 2001, Trends in Neurosciences.

[49]  F. Restle Discrimination of cues in mazes: a resolution of the place-vs.-response question. , 1957, Psychological review.

[50]  B. Campbell,et al.  Punishment and aversive behavior , 1969 .