A New Self-Report Measure of Self-Management of Type 1 Diabetes for Adolescents

Background:The development of instruments to measure self-management in youth with type 1 diabetes has not kept up with current understanding of the concept. Objective:This study aimed to report the development and the testing of a new self-report measure to assess the Self-Management of Type 1 Diabetes in Adolescents (SMOD-A). Methods:Following a qualitative study, items were identified and reviewed by experts for content validity. A total of 515 adolescents, 13 to 21 years old, participated in a field study by completing the SMOD-A (either once or twice) and additional measures of diabetes-related self-efficacy (Self-Efficacy for Diabetes Scale), quality of life (Diabetes Quality of Life for Youth Questionnaire), self-management (Diabetes Self-Management Profile), and adherence (Self-Care Inventory). Data were collected also on metabolic control (glycosylated hemoglobin [HbA1c]). Results:The content validity index was .93. Exploratory alpha factor analyses revealed five subscales: Collaboration With Parents, Diabetes Care Activities, Diabetes Problem Solving, Diabetes Communication, and Goals (&agr; = .71 to .85). The stability of the SMOD-A ranged from .60 to .88 at 2 weeks (test-retest) to .59 to .85 at 3 months. Correlations of SMOD-A subscales with Self-Efficacy for Diabetes Scale-Diabetes; Diabetes Quality of Life for Youth Questionnaire satisfaction, impact, and worry; Diabetes Self-Management Profile; and Self-Care Inventory were generally significant and in the expected direction. Collaboration with parents and HbA1c values were related significantly and positively (r = .11); all other SMOD-A subscales were related significantly and negatively to HbA1c (r = −.10 to −.26), demonstrating that better self-management is associated somewhat with better metabolic control and supporting construct validity of the new measure. Discussion:The SMOD-A has been found to be a reliable, stable, and valid measure of SMOD-A.

[1]  K. Knafl,et al.  Determining Content Validity of a Self-Report Instrument for Adolescents Using a Heterogeneous Expert Panel , 2007, Nursing research.

[2]  Nancy H. Leonard,et al.  The Trait of Curiosity as a Predictor of Emotional Intelligence , 2007 .

[3]  Lu-I Chang,et al.  Family influence on self-care, quality of life, and metabolic control in school-age children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. , 2007, Journal of pediatric nursing.

[4]  Kathleen A Knafl,et al.  Changing patterns of self-management in youth with type I diabetes. , 2006, Journal of pediatric nursing.

[5]  Cheryl Tatano Beck,et al.  The content validity index: are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations. , 2006, Research in nursing & health.

[6]  L. Greening,et al.  A Model for Promoting Adolescents' Adherence to Treatment for Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus , 2006 .

[7]  K. Knafl,et al.  A framework for the study of self- and family management of chronic conditions. , 2006, Nursing outlook.

[8]  E. Storch,et al.  The relation between family factors and metabolic control: the role of diabetes adherence. , 2006, Journal of pediatric psychology.

[9]  W. Tamborlane,et al.  Insulin pump treatment of childhood type 1 diabetes. , 2005, Pediatric clinics of North America.

[10]  Hui-Ju Chiu A Test of the Bruhn and Parcel Model of Health Promotion , 2005, The journal of nursing research : JNR.

[11]  L. Rajmil Health measurement scales. A practical guide to their development and use, 3rd ed , 2005 .

[12]  Russell V. Lenth,et al.  SPSS 12.0 Statistical Procedures Companion , 2005 .

[13]  B. Anderson,et al.  Care of children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes: a statement of the American Diabetes Association. , 2005, Diabetes care.

[14]  Cary L. Cooper,et al.  A Shortened Stress Evaluation Tool (ASSET) , 2004 .

[15]  M. Follen,et al.  Distress after an abnormal Pap smear result: scale development and psychometric validation. , 2004, Preventive medicine.

[16]  M. Dennis,et al.  Predicting response to substance abuse treatment among pregnant and postpartum women , 2004 .

[17]  Yasuo Amemiya,et al.  Factor Analysis at 100:Historical Developments and Future Directions , 2003, Multivariate behavioral research.

[18]  Kathleen A Knafl,et al.  The concept of self-management of type 1 diabetes in children and adolescents: an evolutionary concept analysis. , 2002, Journal of advanced nursing.

[19]  J. Aikens,et al.  Development of the Diabetes Problem-Solving Measure for Adolescents , 2001, The Diabetes educator.

[20]  André Beauducel,et al.  On the generalizability of factors: The influence of changing contexts of variables on different methods of factor extraction , 2001 .

[21]  M. Sadler,et al.  Validation of a structured interview for the assessment of diabetes self-management. , 2000, Diabetes care.

[22]  L. Greening,et al.  Self-Efficacy as a Mediator Variable for Adolescents' Adherence to Treatment for Insulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus , 2000 .

[23]  L Greening,et al.  Adolescents' Health Attitudes and Adherence to Treatment for Insulin‐Dependent Diabetes Mellitus , 1998, Journal of developmental and behavioral pediatrics : JDBP.

[24]  Marsha P. Johnson Statistical Methods for Health Care Research , 1996 .

[25]  J. Skyler,et al.  Adolescents With Diabetes: Gender Differences in Psychosocial Functioning and Glycemic Control , 1995 .

[26]  Comparison of factor analysis options using the Home/Employment Orientation Scale. , 1993, Nursing research.

[27]  Robert F. DeVellis,et al.  Scale Development: Theory and Applications. , 1992 .

[28]  D. Marrero,et al.  A Modified Quality-of-Life Measure for Youths: Psychometric Properties , 1991, The Diabetes educator.

[29]  J. Skyler,et al.  Developmental and Behavioral Aspects of Diabetes Management in Youngsters , 1990 .

[30]  S. Ferketich,et al.  Factor analysis revisited. , 1990, Nursing research.

[31]  S. Hauser,et al.  Self-Efficacy in Adolescent Girls and Boys With Insulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus , 1987, Diabetes Care.

[32]  Henry F. Kaiser,et al.  Alpha factor analysis , 1965, Psychometrika.