An Indirect Estimation of Machine Parameters for Serial Production Lines with Bernoulli Reliability Model

Automated measurement of the machine reliability parameters for a production system enables a continuous update of the mathematical model of the system, which can be used for various analysis and productivity improvement. However, the continuous update may be impeded by some machines of which automated parameter measurements are out of order. Such a situation has been observed, for instance, when some of the machines in the line cannot save log files, or IoT devices that measure these machines stop functioning. In this context, this paper addresses the problem of estimating the efficiencies of those machines while avoiding a direct manual measurement (by human) of up- and down times for them. It turns out that those efficiencies can be computed using starvation/blockage data of the neighboring machines along with the system information. With this, a continuous update of the model is possible even though some machines do not report status in automated manner. The method is indirect as opposed to a direct manual measurement by human. The results are derived for serial production lines with Bernoulli reliability characteristics. Simulation studies are carried out to verify the accuracy of proposed estimation method in both two-machine line case and multi-machine line case.

[1]  Stephan Biller,et al.  Simulation study of a bottleneck-based dispatching policy for a maintenance workforce , 2010 .

[2]  Ying Peng,et al.  A prognosis method using age-dependent hidden semi-Markov model for equipment health prediction , 2011 .

[3]  Joaquín B. Ordieres Meré,et al.  Smart factories in Industry 4.0: A review of the concept and of energy management approached in production based on the Internet of Things paradigm , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management.

[4]  Jingshan Li,et al.  Modeling, analysis and continuous improvement of food production systems: A case study at a meat shaving and packaging line , 2012 .

[5]  Y. Wang,et al.  Time-of-use based electricity demand response for sustainable manufacturing systems , 2013 .

[6]  Okyay Kaynak,et al.  Industrial Cyberphysical Systems: A Backbone of the Fourth Industrial Revolution , 2017, IEEE Industrial Electronics Magazine.

[7]  Liang Zhang,et al.  Smart production systems: automating decision-making in manufacturing environment , 2020, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[8]  Soundar R. T. Kumara,et al.  Cyber-physical systems in manufacturing , 2016 .

[9]  Jens P. Wulfsberg,et al.  Industry 4.0 implies lean manufacturing: Research activities in industry 4.0 function as enablers for lean manufacturing , 2016 .

[10]  Stephan Biller,et al.  Quality/Quantity Improvement in an Automotive Paint Shop: A Case Study , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering.

[12]  Jorge Arinez,et al.  Finite Production Run-Based Serial Lines With Bernoulli Machines: Performance Analysis, Bottleneck, and Case Study , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering.

[13]  Jingshan Li,et al.  Continuous improvement at Toyota manufacturing plant: applications of production systems engineering methods , 2013 .

[14]  Jiafu Wan,et al.  Mobile Services for Customization Manufacturing Systems: An Example of Industry 4.0 , 2016, IEEE Access.

[15]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.