Innovation and organisational performance: A critical review of the instruments used to measure organisational performance

Background: Innovation is recognised as one of the most important determinant of organisational performance. Yet, the results of studies that investigate the relationship between innovation and organisational performance are inconclusive. The inconsistency has been attributed to a number of factors, which include, among others, the measures used to evaluate organisational performance. Aim: This study was set out to identify, categorise and critically analyse the instruments used to assess organisational performance when investigating the relationship between innovation and organisational performance. Setting: The study focuses on all scientific publications reporting on organisational performance, inclusive of both financial and non-financial indicators of performance, and are not limited to any specific country or industry. Methods: The systematic literature review methodology was used to identify studies which investigated the relationship between innovation and organisational performance. Once identified, articles were analysed on the way organisational performance was measured. Classification was done with reference to financial and non-financial indicators, accounting and market-based, as well as objective and subjective measures. Results: The findings show that profitability, sales growth and return on assets (ROA) are the most preferred accounting-based financial measures of organisation performance. In addition, Tobin’s Q was found to be the most favoured market-based financial measure of organisational performance. The study further reveals that market share, customer satisfaction and productivity are the most popular non-financial-based measures of organisational performance. Conclusion: The use of measures of organisational performance is often left to the discussion of the researcher, which is not implicitly wrong, but does little to contribute to the body of knowledge on this important topic. Researchers are firstly urged to clearly define which aspects of organisational performance they intend to study, secondly to use established instruments or often used indicators of organisational performance, and thirdly to combine both objective and subjective measures of organisational performance. This would allow for researchers to build on the work of other and strengthen the body of knowledge in this area.

[1]  V. Babić,et al.  KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT, INNOVATIVENESS, AND ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE: EVIDENCE FROM SERBIA , 2013 .

[2]  V. M. Dalfard,et al.  Relations between transformational leadership, organizational learning, knowledge management, organizational innovation, and organizational performance: an empirical investigation of manufacturing firms , 2013 .

[3]  Ian Alam,et al.  Innovation Strategy, Process and Performance in the Commercial Banking Industry , 2003 .

[4]  Yuhyung Shin,et al.  Top Management Ethical Leadership and Firm Performance: Mediating Role of Ethical and Procedural Justice Climate , 2015 .

[5]  J. Jenssen,et al.  INNOVATION STRATEGY, WORKING CLIMATE, AND FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE IN TRADITIONAL MANUFACTURING FIRMS: AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS , 2012 .

[6]  M. Kuzyk,et al.  Public Support for Innovation in Russian Firms: Looking for Improvements in Corporate Performance Quality , 2015 .

[7]  Mateja Bodlaj THE IMPACT OF A RESPONSIVE AND PROACTIVE MARKET ORIENTATION ON INNOVATION AND BUSINESS PERFORMANCE , 2010 .

[8]  Jose-Luis Hervas-Oliver,et al.  Process innovation strategy in SMEs, organizational innovation and performance: a misleading debate? , 2014 .

[9]  Antonio Oliveira de Carvalho,et al.  Organizational resilience: a comparative study between innovative and non-innovative companies based on the financial performance analysis , 2016 .

[10]  Ruth Stock,et al.  Patterns and performance outcomes of innovation orientation , 2011 .

[11]  R. Bettis Modern Financial Theory, Corporate Strategy and Public Policy: Three Conundrums , 1983 .

[12]  Patrick M. Kreiser,et al.  Entrepreneurial Orientation and Firm Performance: The Unique Impact of Innovativeness, Proactiveness, and Risk-taking , 2010 .

[13]  M. Nawaz Impact of knowledge management practices on firm performance : Testing the mediation role of innovation in the manufacturing sector of Pakistan Pakistan , 2014 .

[14]  Borut Likar,et al.  Innovation investment and economic performance in transition economies: Evidence from Slovenia , 2013 .

[15]  M. Terziovski Innovation practice and its performance implications in small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in the manufacturing sector: a resource‐based view , 2010 .

[16]  V. Pucik,et al.  Relationship between innovativeness, quality, growth, profitability, and market value , 2005 .

[17]  Wei Shen,et al.  The Relationship between Accounting and Market Measures of Firm Financial Performance: How Strong Is It? , 2010 .

[18]  Yi-Fang Yang,et al.  Effects of Service Innovation on Financial Performance of Small Audit Firms in Taiwan , 2014 .

[19]  M. Hassan,et al.  Effects of innovation types on firm performance: An empirical study on Pakistan's manufacturing sector , 2013 .

[20]  Tim Kastelle,et al.  The Role of Networks in Small and Medium‐Sized Enterprise Innovation and Firm Performance , 2012 .

[21]  Gordon E. Greenley Market Orientation and Company Performance: Empirical Evidence From UK Companies , 1995 .

[22]  Serdal Temel,et al.  INNOVATION AND BUSINESS PERFORMANCE IN SMALL ENTERPRISES: AN ENTERPRISE-LEVEL ANALYSIS , 2011 .

[23]  S. Tsao,et al.  Family Management and Internationalization: The Impact on Firm Performance and Innovation , 2013 .

[24]  Richard M. Walker,et al.  Management Innovation and Organizational Performance: The Mediating Effect of Performance Management , 2011 .

[25]  S. Hart,et al.  Looking for performance: How innovation and strategy may affect market orientation models , 2011 .

[26]  Kevin Campbell,et al.  Gender Diversity in the Boardroom and Firm Financial Performance , 2008 .

[27]  A. Shenhar,et al.  Beyond the Balanced Scorecard:: Refining the Search for Organizational Success Measures , 2003 .

[28]  Ahmet H. Kirca,et al.  Firm Innovativeness and Its Performance Outcomes: A Meta-Analytic Review and Theoretical Integration , 2012 .

[29]  Terry E. Say Grabbing Lightning-Building a Capability for Breakthrough Innovation , 2008 .

[30]  I. Basterretxea,et al.  Impact of Management and Innovation Capabilities on Performance: Are Cooperatives Different? , 2012 .

[31]  A. Zulkafli,et al.  Corporate governance, innovation investment and firm performance: evidence from Malaysian public listed companies , 2010 .

[32]  P. Navarra,et al.  Business Group Affiliation, Innovation, Internationalization, and Performance: A SemiParametric Analysis , 2013 .

[33]  K. Wheatley,et al.  Executive Compensation as a Moderator of the Innovation – Performance Relationship 1 , 2010 .

[34]  Patricia J. Daugherty,et al.  Knowledge Synthesis and Innovative Logistics Processes: Enhancing Operational Flexibility and Performance , 2011 .

[35]  R. Moura-Leite,et al.  Innovation with High Social Benefits and Corporate Financial Performance , 2012 .

[36]  Allen N. Berger,et al.  Capital Structure and Firm Performance: A New Approach to Testing Agency Theory and an Application to the Banking Industry , 2006 .

[37]  P. Nijkamp,et al.  From innovation to commercialization through networks and agglomerations: analysis of sources of innovation, innovation capabilities and performance of Dutch SMEs , 2013 .

[38]  Rocío Durán-Vázquez,et al.  Innovation and CSR Impact on Financial Performance of Selected Companies in Mexico , 2012 .

[39]  Aytaç Gökmen,et al.  The Effect of Knowledge Management, Technological Capability and Innovation on the Enterprise Performance: A Comprehensive Emperical Study of the Turkish Textile Sector , 2011, J. Inf. Knowl. Manag..

[40]  Pablo Fernández EVA, Economic Profit, and Cash Value Added do not Measure Shareholder Value Creation , 2002 .

[41]  R. Eggink The role of innovation in economic development , 2011 .

[42]  Andrés Guiral Corporate Social Performance, Innovation Intensity, and Financial Performance: Evidence from Lending Decisions , 2012 .

[43]  Jun Liu,et al.  Internal Commitment or External Collaboration? The Impact of Human Resource Management Systems on Firm Innovation and Performance , 2013 .

[44]  M. Cortez,et al.  Innovation and Financial Performance of Electronics Companies: A Cross-Country Comparison , 2015 .

[45]  E. L. Cox,et al.  Guest editors\' introduction to the special issue: why is there a resource-based view? Toward a theory of competitive heterogeneity , 2003 .

[46]  A. Bojica,et al.  Innovativeness and Performance in Women-Owned Small Firms: The Role of Knowledge Acquisition , 2012 .

[47]  A. Garg,et al.  Measuring business performance : a case study : research article , 2004 .

[48]  Barbara Bigliardi,et al.  The effect of innovation on financial performance: A research study involving SMEs , 2012 .

[49]  Richard C. Becherer,et al.  Customer Orientation and Performance in Small Firms: Examining the Moderating Influence of Risk‐Taking, Innovativeness, and Opportunity Focus , 2012 .

[50]  Robert E. Hoskisson,et al.  Theory and research in strategic management: Swings of a pendulum , 1999 .

[51]  Tor Helge Aas,et al.  The impact of service innovation on firm-level financial performance , 2011 .

[52]  Moustafa Battor,et al.  The impact of customer relationship management capability on innovation and performance advantages: testing a mediated model , 2010 .

[53]  James Towey Effects of customer and innovation asset configuration Strategies on Firm Performance , 2011 .

[54]  B. Skaggs,et al.  The Effects of Customer-Firm Interaction On Innovation and Performance In Service Firms , 2010, Journal of Business Strategies.

[55]  Pablo Muñoz-Gallego,et al.  Organizational and environmental factors as moderators of the relationship between multidimensional innovation and performance , 2012 .

[56]  Esther P. Y. Tang,et al.  Effects of supplier and customer integration on product innovation and performance: Empirical evidence in Hong Kong manufacturers , 2010 .

[57]  Alexander Kock,et al.  Top Management Team Diversity and Strategic Innovation Orientation: The Relationship and Consequences for Innovativeness and Performance , 2011 .

[58]  Laura B. Cardinal,et al.  A Longitudinal Study of the Impact of R&D, Patents, and Product Innovation on Firm Performance , 2010 .

[59]  Hao-Chen Huang,et al.  Target Costing, Business Model Innovation, and Firm Performance: An Empirical Analysis of Chinese Firms , 2012 .

[60]  Stefan Reichelstein,et al.  Objective versus Subjective Indicators of Managerial Performance , 2009 .

[61]  Accounting Conservatism and Real Options , 2007 .

[62]  Cengiz Yilmaz,et al.  How does innovativeness yield superior firm performance? The role of marketing effectiveness , 2012 .

[63]  Robyn L. Keast,et al.  Network structure, knowledge governance, and firm performance: evidence from Innovation Networks and SMEs in the UK , 2010 .

[64]  M. Mazzanti,et al.  Environmentally-Oriented Innovative Strategies and Firm Performances in Services - Micro-Evidence from Italy , 2007, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[65]  C. Mafini Predicting Organisational Performance Through Innovation, Quality And Inter-Organisational Systems: A Public Sector Perspective , 2015 .

[66]  Yu‐Fang Yen,et al.  The impact of bank’s human capital on organizational performance: How innovation influences performance , 2012 .

[67]  Lisa Z. Song,et al.  Does Strategic Planning Enhance or Impede Innovation and Firm Performance , 2011 .

[68]  Engin Deniz Eriş,et al.  The Effect of Market Orientation, Learning Orientation and Innovativeness on Firm Performance: A Research from Turkish Logistics Sector , 2012 .

[69]  David J. Ketchen,et al.  An assessment of the measurement of performance in international business research , 2008 .

[70]  A. Culyer,et al.  The effectiveness of occupational health and safety management system interventions: A systematic review , 2007 .

[71]  J. Tobin A General Equilibrium Approach to Monetary Theory , 1969 .

[72]  Alison Nightingale,et al.  A guide to systematic literature reviews , 2009 .

[73]  P. Ritala Coopetition Strategy – When is it Successful? Empirical Evidence on Innovation and Market Performance , 2001 .

[74]  Ethan Mollick People and Process, Suits and Innovators: The Role of Individuals in Firm Performance , 2011 .

[75]  Subroto Roy,et al.  Global innovation generation and financial performance in business-to-business relationships: the case of cross-border alliances in the pharmaceutical industry , 2011 .

[76]  D. Tranfield,et al.  Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence-Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review , 2003 .

[77]  Bart Van Looy,et al.  Technology Alliance Portfolios and Financial Performance: Value-Enhancing and Cost-Increasing Effects of Open Innovation* , 2010 .

[78]  C. Camarero,et al.  How cultural organizations’ size and funding influence innovation and performance: the case of museums , 2011 .

[79]  Manfredi Bruccoleri,et al.  The Effect Of Inbound, Outbound And Coupled Innovation On Performance , 2012 .

[80]  M. Cortez,et al.  The Virtuous Cycles between Environmental Innovations and Financial Performance: Case Study of Japanese Automotive and Electronics Companies , 2011 .

[81]  R. Stock,et al.  Linking multiple layers of innovation-oriented corporate culture, product program innovativeness, and business performance: a contingency approach , 2013 .

[82]  J. Dawes The Relationship between Subjective and Objective Company Performance Measures in Market Orientation Research: Further Empirical Evidence , 1999 .

[83]  Gina Colarelli O'Connor,et al.  Boards of Directors, Innovation, and Performance: An Exploration at Multiple Levels , 2013 .

[84]  Adegoke Oke,et al.  Innovation Strategy, Human Resource Policy, and Firms' Revenue Growth: The Roles of Environmental Uncertainty and Innovation Performance , 2012, Decis. Sci..

[85]  R. E. Shrieves,et al.  Towards Reconciliation of Market Performance Measures to Strategic Management Research , 1986 .

[86]  H. Tikkanen,et al.  Business model innovation vs replication: financial performance implications of strategic emphases , 2010 .

[87]  Ron Adner,et al.  Value Creation in Innovation Ecosystems: How the Structure of Technological Interdependence Affects Firm Performance in New Technology Generations , 2009 .

[88]  C. Nobes,et al.  Financial Accounting: An International Introduction , 2004 .

[89]  J. Haar,et al.  Risk taking, innovativeness and competitive rivalry: A three-way interaction towards firm performance , 2010 .

[90]  P. Modi Market orientation in nonprofit organizations: innovativeness, resource scarcity, and performance , 2012 .

[91]  Erlend Nybakk,et al.  Learning Orientation, Innovativeness And Financial Performance In Traditional Manufacturing Firms: A Higher-Order Structural Equation Model , 2012 .

[92]  Keiko Ito,et al.  Why some firms persistently out-perform others: investigating the interactions between innovation and exporting strategies , 2010 .

[93]  Xiaobo Wu,et al.  Technology embeddedness, innovation differentiation strategies and firm performance: Evidence from Chinese manufacturing firms , 2011 .

[94]  M. Hassan,et al.  Impact of knowledge management practices on firm performance: Testing the mediation role of innovation in the manufacturing sector of Pakistan , 2014 .

[95]  David J. Ketchen,et al.  AN ASSESSMENT OF THE USE OF STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT RESEARCH , 2004 .

[96]  Regina C. McNally,et al.  Product Innovativeness Dimensions and Their Relationships with Product Advantage, Product Financial Performance, and Project Protocol , 2010 .