Accessing, Integrating, and Inhibiting Word Meaning in Poor Comprehenders

This study examined three processes crucial to reading comprehension (semantic access, integration, and inhibition) to identify causes of comprehension impairment. Poor comprehenders were compared to chronological-age controls and vocabulary-age (VA) controls. When listening to homonym primes (“bank”) versus unrelated primes, controls were faster to name pictures related to dominant (money) and subordinate (river) meanings at 250 ms interstimulus interval (ISI) but only showed dominant priming at 1,000 ms ISI, whereas poor comprehenders only showed dominant priming. When listening to subordinately biased sentences ending in homonyms (“John fished from the bank”) versus control sentences, all groups showed priming when naming subordinate (appropriate) pictures at 250 ms ISI: VA controls and poor comprehenders also showed priming when naming dominant (inappropriate) pictures. At 1,000 ms ISI, controls showed appropriate priming, whereas poor comprehenders only showed inappropriate priming. These findings suggest that poor comprehenders have difficulties accessing subordinate word meanings, which can manifest as a failure to inhibit irrelevant information.

[1]  Paula J. Clarke,et al.  Accessing and selecting word meaning in autism spectrum disorder. , 2011, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[2]  Dorothy V M Bishop,et al.  A longitudinal investigation of early reading and language skills in children with poor reading comprehension. , 2010, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[3]  Charles Hulme,et al.  Ameliorating Children’s Reading-Comprehension Difficulties , 2010, Psychological science.

[4]  Kate Nation,et al.  Suppressing Irrelevant Information from Working Memory: Evidence for Domain-Specific Deficits in Poor Comprehenders. , 2010 .

[5]  M. Schoot,et al.  Lexical ambiguity resolution in good and poor comprehenders: An eye fixation and self-paced reading study in primary school children , 2009 .

[6]  Charles A. Perfetti,et al.  Reading Ability: Lexical Quality to Comprehension , 2007 .

[7]  Jane Oakhill,et al.  Profiles of children with specific reading comprehension difficulties. , 2006, The British journal of educational psychology.

[8]  James R. Booth,et al.  Development of Lexical and Sentence Level Context Effects for Dominant and Subordinate Word Meanings of Homonyms , 2006, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[9]  Joseph K. Torgesen,et al.  Relationships Between Word Knowledge and Reading Comprehension in Third-Grade Children , 2006 .

[10]  Kate Cain,et al.  Individual differences in children's memory and reading comprehension: An investigation of semantic and inhibitory deficits , 2006, Memory.

[11]  T. McNamara.  Semantic Priming: Perspectives from Memory and Word Recognition , 2005 .

[12]  M. Barnes,et al.  Meaning construction and integration in children with hydrocephalus , 2004, Brain and Language.

[13]  Danielle S McNamara,et al.  Suppressing Irrelevant Information: Knowledge Activation or Inhibition? , 2004 .

[14]  S..  An Activation-Selection View Of Homograph Disambiguation : A Matter of Emphasis ? , 2004 .

[15]  William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Modelling the effects of semantic ambiguity in word recognition , 2004, Cogn. Sci..

[16]  Kate Nation,et al.  Investigating individual differences in children's real-time sentence comprehension using language-mediated eye movements. , 2003, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[17]  Carsten Elbro,et al.  The ability to learn new word meanings from context by school-age children with and without language comprehension difficulties , 2003, Journal of Child Language.

[18]  Margaret J. Snowling,et al.  Phonological and semantic contributions to children's picture naming skill: Evidence from children with developmental reading disorders , 2001 .

[19]  K. Rayner,et al.  The effect of prior disambiguating context on the comprehension of ambiguous words: Evidence from eye movements. , 2001 .

[20]  Patrizia Tabossi,et al.  Methodological issues in the study of lexical ambiguity resolution. , 2001 .

[21]  D. Gorfein.  On the consequences of meaning selection: Perspectives on resolving lexical ambiguity. , 2001 .

[22]  Jane Oakhill,et al.  Inference making ability and its relation to comprehension failure in young children , 1999 .

[23]  K. Nation,et al.  Developmental differences in sensitivity to semantic relations among good and poor comprehenders: evidence from semantic priming , 1999, Cognition.

[24]  K. Nation,et al.  Individual differences in contextual facilitation: evidence from dyslexia and poor reading comprehension. , 1998, Child development.

[25]  Margaret J. Snowling,et al.  Semantic processing and the development of word-recognition skills: Evidence from children with reading comprehension difficulties. , 1998 .

[26]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Comprehension: A Paradigm for Cognition , 1998 .

[27]  Cheryl Frenck-Mestre,et al.  Second Language Autonomy , 1997 .

[28]  K. Nation,et al.  Assessing reading difficulties: the validity and utility of current measures of reading skill. , 1997, The British journal of educational psychology.

[29]  A. Baumgaertner,et al.  Suppression and discourse comprehension in right brain-damaged adults: A preliminary report , 1997 .

[30]  M. Gernsbacher.  Group Differences in Suppression Skill. , 1997, Neuropsychology, development, and cognition. Section B, Aging, neuropsychology and cognition.

[31]  Margaret J. Snowling,et al.  Graded non-word reading test , 1996 .

[32]  Susan E. Stothard,et al.  A comparison of phonological skills in children with reading comprehension difficulties and children with decoding difficulties. , 1995, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[33]  Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al.  The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution , 1994 .

[34]  L. J. Chapman,et al.  Do Children and the Elderly Show Heightened Semantic Priming? How to Answer the Question. , 1994 .

[35]  R. Ulrich,et al.  Effects of truncation on reaction time analysis. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[36]  Marcus Taft,et al.  Reading and the Mental Lexicon , 1991 .

[37]  M. Gernsbacher,et al.  The mechanism of suppression: a component of general comprehension skill. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[38]  J. H. Neely.  Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. , 1991 .

[39]  M. Gernsbacher,et al.  Investigating differences in general comprehension skill. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[40]  W. Kintsch.  The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: a construction-integration model. , 1988, Psychological review.

[41]  Michael Wilson,et al.  MRC psycholinguistic database: Machine-usable dictionary, version 2.00 , 1988 .

[42]  D. Burke,et al.  Semantic priming in young and older adults: evidence for age constancy in automatic and attentional processes. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[43]  Greg B. Simpson,et al.  Lexical ambiguity and children's word recognition. , 1986 .

[44]  Raymond J. Shaw,et al.  Aging and the time course of semantic activation. , 1986, Journal of gerontology.

[45]  Curt Burgess,et al.  Activation and selection processes in the recognition of ambiguous words. , 1985 .

[46]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Pre- and postlexical loci of contextual effects on word recognition , 1984, Memory & cognition.

[47]  J. G. Snodgrass,et al.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[48]  D. Swinney.  Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (Re)consideration of context effects , 1979 .