LES of turbulent flow past a swept fence

Abstract The present study deals with the large-eddy simulation of the span-wise invariant turbulent flow past a swept fence at low Reynolds numbers. The swept fence geometry was introduced by McCluskey et al. [Eighth Symposium on Turbulent Shear Flows, 1991, p. 9.5.1] as a way of gathering information on the behaviour of near wall flows beneath a separation region in the presence of a significant cross flow. The configuration avoids both the lack of generality of typical statistically two-dimensional flows and the difficulties of fully three-dimensional flows. In the present case, large-eddy simulation is both a challenging and promising approach. On the one hand, as in most low-Reynolds number and recirculating flows, simple wall models cannot be applied [Engineering Turbulence Modelling and Experiments 2, Florence, Italy, p. 303] on the other hand, due to the relatively low Reynolds of the flow and the type of scaling suggested in Hardman and Hancock [Exp. Fluids 27 (2000) 653], accurate resolution of the near wall region can be achieved without incurring prohibitively high computational costs. A variant of the dynamic SGS model of Germano et al. [Phys. Fluids A 3 (1991) 1760] with a smooth and reliable numerical behaviour is also tested in this flow. The agreement with the experimental data of Hardman [Moderately three-dimensional separated and reattaching turbulent flow. Ph.D. thesis, University of Surrey, 1998] is found to be satisfactory.

[1]  R. Simpson A model for the backflow mean velocity profile , 1983 .

[2]  Large-Eddy Simulation of the Flow over a Wall-Mounted Fence , 2001 .

[3]  Alexander J. Smits Scaling Parameters for a Time-Averaged Separation Bubble , 1982 .

[4]  K. Lilly The representation of small-scale turbulence in numerical simulation experiments , 1966 .

[5]  W. P. Jones,et al.  Large-eddy simulation of a plane jet in a cross-flow , 1996 .

[6]  H.-J. Kaltenbach,et al.  Direct numerical simulation of flow separation behind a swept, rearward-facing step at ReH=3000 , 2000 .

[7]  Measurements of mean and fluctuating wall shear stress beneath spanwise-invariant separation bubbles , 1999 .

[8]  P. Moin,et al.  Direct numerical simulation of turbulent flow over a backward-facing step , 1997, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[9]  Parviz Moin,et al.  The structure of two-dimensional separation , 1990, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[10]  Ugo Piomelli,et al.  Large-eddy simulation of rotating channel flows using a localized dynamic model , 1995 .

[11]  Knut Akselvoll,et al.  Large Eddy Simulation of a Backward Facing Step Flow , 1993 .

[12]  I. P. Castro,et al.  The structure of a turbulent shear layer bounding a separation region , 1987, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[13]  P. Moin,et al.  A dynamic subgrid‐scale eddy viscosity model , 1990 .

[14]  Toshio Kobayashi,et al.  Large eddy simulation of backward-facing step flow , 1992 .

[15]  F. Porté-Agel,et al.  A scale-dependent dynamic model for large-eddy simulation: application to a neutral atmospheric boundary layer , 2000, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[16]  M. Germano,et al.  Turbulence: the filtering approach , 1992, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[17]  J. Smagorinsky,et al.  GENERAL CIRCULATION EXPERIMENTS WITH THE PRIMITIVE EQUATIONS , 1963 .

[18]  B. Geurts,et al.  Direct and large-eddy simulation IV , 2001 .

[19]  C. Rhie,et al.  Numerical Study of the Turbulent Flow Past an Airfoil with Trailing Edge Separation , 1983 .

[20]  Alexander Orellano,et al.  Numerical simulation (DNS and LES) of manipulated turbulent boundary layer flow over a surface-mounted fence , 2000 .

[21]  P. Moin,et al.  Effects of the Computational Time Step on Numerical Solutions of Turbulent Flow , 1994 .