Further developments of a fuzzy set map comparison approach

Fuzzy set map comparison offers a novel approach to map comparison.The approach is specifically aimed at categorical raster maps and applies fuzzy set techniques, accounting for fuzziness of location and fuzziness of category, to create a similarity map as well as an overall similarity statistic: the Fuzzy Kappa. To date, the calculation of the Fuzzy Kappa (or K-fuzzy) has not been formally derived, and the documented procedure was only valid for cases without fuzziness of category. Furthermore, it required an infinitely large, edgeless map. This paper presents the full derivation of the Fuzzy Kappa; the method is now valid for comparisons considering fuzziness of both location and category and does not require further assumptions. This theoretical completion opens opportunities for use of the technique that surpass the original intentions. In particular, the categorical similarity matrix can be applied to highlight or disregard differences pertaining to selected categories or groups of categories and to distinguish between differences due to omission and commission.

[1]  Tarmo K. Remmel,et al.  Accuracy of discontinuous binary surfaces: a case study using boreal forest fires , 2002, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[2]  R. Costanza.  MODEL GOODNESS OF FIT: A MULTIPLE RESOLUTION PROCEDURE , 1989 .

[3]  Steffen Fritz,et al.  Comparison of land cover maps using fuzzy agreement , 2005, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[4]  Alex Hagen,et al.  Fuzzy set approach to assessing similarity of categorical maps , 2003, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[5]  Roger White,et al.  The Use of Constrained Cellular Automata for High-Resolution Modelling of Urban Land-Use Dynamics , 1997 .

[6]  Giles M. Foody,et al.  Status of land cover classification accuracy assessment , 2002 .

[7]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Fuzzy Sets , 1996, Inf. Control..

[8]  Stephen T. Buckland,et al.  Similarity Indices for Spatia I Ecological Data , 2001 .

[9]  Roger White,et al.  Towards an automatic calibration procedure for constrained cellular automata , 2004, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[10]  Roger White,et al.  Developing an Urban Land Use Simulator for European Cities , 2001 .

[11]  Oscar H. IBARm.  Information and Control , 1957, Nature.

[12]  Rodger B. Grayson,et al.  Quantitative comparison of spatial fields for hydrological model assessment––some promising approaches , 2005 .

[13]  Barry Boots,et al.  Toward Comparing Maps as Spatial Processes , 2004, SDH.

[14]  S. T. Buckland,et al.  Similarity indices for spatial ecological data. , 2001, Biometrics.

[15]  C. Ehlschlaeger,et al.  Representing uncertainty of area class maps with a correlated inter-map cell swapping heuristic , 2000 .

[16]  Roger White,et al.  Hierarchical fuzzy pattern matching for the regional comparison of land use maps , 2001, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[17]  R. G. Pontius.  Statistical Methods to Partition Effects of Quantity and Location During Comparison of Categorical Maps at Multiple Resolutions , 2002 .

[18]  R. Leemans,et al.  Comparing global vegetation maps with the Kappa statistic , 1992 .