The self-slowing behavioral mechanism of pedestrians under normal and emergency conditions

Abstract We study the similarities and differences between the headway-velocity relations under normal and emergency conditions to explore whether they can be described by a unified behavioral equation. We firstly performed a series of pedestrian experiments in three different scenes under normal and emergency conditions respectively to obtain the behavioral parameters of headway-velocity relations based on the visual hindrance field as well as the high precise trajectories of pedestrians. The strong similarities in the headway-velocity relations in both normal and emergency conditions suggest that a unified behavioral mechanism is at play in human-driven pedestrian traffic. This mechanism is essentially a safety-driven self-slowing behavior that pedestrians try to adopt a safe speed for a given spacing between them to avoid collisions and preserve their personal space. We notice that even in emergency escape situations, people still tend to slow down the speed and show defensive behavior when the headway approaches a critical value in order to decrease the collision level and protect the body from contact as much as possible. Moreover, the differences between normal and emergency conditions are also found in the experiments. Compared to normal condition, the free velocity of pedestrians is markedly higher while the minimum critical headway is much shorter in emergency situation. Especially, the proportionality constant, the reciprocal of which is safe response time, is higher under emergency condition. That means pedestrians will slow down the free speed to zero in a shorter safe response time in emergencies. A modified social force model is then proposed to incorporate this self-slowing behavioral mechanism, and different self-slowing behavioral parameters in the model under normal and emergency conditions both refer to the observed experimental data. Simulations with the same setup as the experiments were carried out for both normal and emergency conditions using the unified model with self-slowing, and the simulated spacetime diagrams as well as stop-and-go waves in circular movement under normal condition, the simulated evacuation efficiency in room evacuation under emergency condition and the simulated velocity profiles in corridor scene under normal and emergency conditions all demonstrate remarkable consistency with the experimental results.

[1]  Jun Zhang,et al.  Extraction and quantitative analysis of microscopic evacuation characteristics based on digital image processing , 2009 .

[2]  Nirajan Shiwakoti,et al.  Understanding differences in emergency escape and experimental pedestrian crowd egress through quantitative comparison , 2016 .

[3]  A U Kemloh Wagoum,et al.  Understanding human queuing behaviour at exits: an empirical study , 2017, Royal Society Open Science.

[4]  Majid Sarvi,et al.  Crowd behaviour and motion: Empirical methods , 2018 .

[5]  Vicsek,et al.  Freezing by heating in a driven mesoscopic system , 1999, Physical review letters.

[6]  T. Nagatani,et al.  Clogging transition of pedestrian flow in T-shaped channel , 2002 .

[7]  S. Maniccam,et al.  Traffic jamming on hexagonal lattice , 2003 .

[8]  Majid Sarvi,et al.  Human exit choice in crowded built environments: Investigating underlying behavioural differences between normal egress and emergency evacuations , 2016 .

[9]  Nirajan Shiwakoti,et al.  Video-based analysis of school students' emergency evacuation behavior in earthquakes , 2016 .

[10]  Siuming Lo,et al.  Experimental study on microscopic moving characteristics of pedestrians in built corridor based on digital image processing , 2010 .

[11]  Ting Li,et al.  Optimal layout design of obstacles for panic evacuation using differential evolution , 2017 .

[12]  Weichen Liao,et al.  Route choice in pedestrians: determinants for initial choices and revising decisions , 2017, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[13]  Claudio O. Dorso,et al.  Room evacuation in the presence of an obstacle , 2011 .

[14]  T. Vicsek,et al.  Simulation of pedestrian crowds in normal and evacuation situations , 2002 .

[15]  T. Nagatani,et al.  Jamming transition in two-dimensional pedestrian traffic , 2000 .

[16]  Meifang Li,et al.  The parameter calibration and optimization of social force model for the real-life 2013 Ya’an earthquake evacuation in China , 2015 .

[17]  Isabella von Sivers,et al.  How Stride Adaptation in Pedestrian Models Improves Navigation , 2014, ArXiv.

[18]  D. Helbing,et al.  Lattice gas simulation of experimentally studied evacuation dynamics. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[19]  C. Dorso,et al.  Microscopic dynamics of pedestrian evacuation , 2005 .

[20]  P. Nafstad,et al.  Occupancy density and benefits of demand-controlled ventilation in Norwegian primary schools , 2005 .

[21]  Edwin R. Galea,et al.  Human Factors Associated with the Selection of Lifts/Elevators or Stairs in Emergency and Normal Usage Conditions , 2012 .

[22]  Weiguo Song,et al.  Experimental study of pedestrian behaviors in a corridor based on digital image processing , 2012 .

[23]  Michael Schreckenberg,et al.  Simulation of competitive egress behavior: comparison with aircraft evacuation data , 2003 .

[24]  Helbing,et al.  Social force model for pedestrian dynamics. , 1995, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[25]  Andreas Schadschneider,et al.  Simulation of evacuation processes using a bionics-inspired cellular automaton model for pedestrian dynamics , 2002 .

[26]  Lubos Buzna,et al.  Self-Organized Pedestrian Crowd Dynamics: Experiments, Simulations, and Design Solutions , 2005, Transp. Sci..

[27]  A. Schadschneider,et al.  Simulation of pedestrian dynamics using a two dimensional cellular automaton , 2001 .

[28]  Daniel R. Parisi,et al.  A modification of the Social Force Model can reproduce experimental data of pedestrian flows in normal conditions , 2009 .

[29]  Andreas Schadschneider,et al.  Phase Coexistence in Congested States of Pedestrian Dynamics , 2010, ACRI.

[30]  Eric Wai Ming Lee,et al.  The effect of overtaking behavior on unidirectional pedestrian flow , 2012 .

[31]  Wei Lv,et al.  A Two-Dimensional Optimal Velocity Model for Unidirectional Pedestrian Flow Based on Pedestrian's Visual Hindrance Field , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[32]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  How simple rules determine pedestrian behavior and crowd disasters , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[33]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  Simulating dynamical features of escape panic , 2000, Nature.

[34]  Gerta Köster,et al.  How cognitive heuristics can explain social interactions in spatial movement , 2016, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.