DEM resolution dependencies of terrain attributes across a landscape

This paper documents resolution dependencies in terrain analysis and describes how they vary across landform location. Six terrain attributes were evaluated as a function of DEM resolution—slope, plan curvature, profile curvature, north–south slope orientation, east–west slope orientation, and topographic wetness index. The research highlights the effect of varying spatial resolution through a spatial sampling/resampling scheme while maintaining sets of indexed sample points at various resolutions. Tested sample points therefore coincide exactly between two directly compared resolutions in terms of their location and elevation value. An unsupervised landform classification procedure based on statistical clustering algorithms was employed to define landform classes in a reproducible manner. Correlation and regression analyses identified sensitive and consistent responses for each attribute as resolution was changed, although the tested terrain attributes responded in characteristically different ways. These responses displayed distinguishable patterns among various landform classes, a conclusion that was further verified by a series of two‐sample, two‐tailed t‐tests.

[1]  J. L. Hatfield Upscaling and Downscaling Methods for Environmental Research , 2001 .

[2]  Ling Bian,et al.  Scale Dependencies of Vegetation and Topography in a Mountainous Environment of Montana , 1993 .

[3]  Lawrence E. Band,et al.  Scale: Landscape attributes and geographical information systems , 1995 .

[4]  Gary A. Peterson,et al.  Soil Attribute Prediction Using Terrain Analysis , 1993 .

[5]  John F. O'Callaghan,et al.  The extraction of drainage networks from digital elevation data , 1984, Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process..

[6]  Bor-Wen Tsai,et al.  The Effect of DEM Resolution on Slope and Aspect Mapping , 1991 .

[7]  M. Hutchinson A new procedure for gridding elevation and stream line data with automatic removal of spurious pits , 1989 .

[8]  W. P. A. van. Deursen,et al.  Geographical information systems and dynamic models : development and application of a prototype spatial modelling language , 1995 .

[9]  Keith Beven,et al.  Effects of spatial variability and scale with implications to hydrologic modeling , 1988 .

[10]  K. Beven,et al.  The in(a/tan/β) index:how to calculate it and how to use it within the topmodel framework , 1995 .

[11]  P. Burrough,et al.  Fuzzy k-means classification of topo-climatic data as an aid to forest mapping in the Greater Yellowstone Area, USA , 2001, Landscape Ecology.

[12]  John P. Wilson,et al.  The Role of Attribute Selection in GIS Representations of the Biophysical Environment , 2006 .

[13]  A. Krupnik,et al.  Accuracy Assessment of Automatically Derived Digital Elevation Models from SPOT Images , 2000 .

[14]  Jay Gao,et al.  Resolution and Accuracy of Terrain Representation by Grid DEMs at a Micro-Scale , 1997, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[15]  John P. Wilson,et al.  Effects of variable attribute weights on landform classification , 2006 .

[16]  Keith Beven,et al.  Prophecy, reality and uncertainty in distributed hydrological modelling , 1993 .

[17]  PETER FISHER Propagating effects of database generalization on the viewshed , 1996, Trans. GIS.

[18]  L. Band Topographic Partition of Watersheds with Digital Elevation Models , 1986 .

[19]  Berthold K. P. Horn,et al.  Hill shading and the reflectance map , 1981, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[20]  Alan B. Anderson,et al.  Effect and uncertainty of digital elevation model spatial resolutions on predicting the topographical factor for soil loss estimation , 2002 .

[21]  C. Thorne,et al.  Quantitative analysis of land surface topography , 1987 .

[22]  Jaroslav Hofierka,et al.  Modelling Topographic Potential for Erosion and Deposition Using GIS , 1996, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[23]  Keith Beven,et al.  Changing ideas in hydrology — The case of physically-based models , 1989 .

[24]  Ian D. Moore,et al.  Terrain attributes: estimation methods and scale effects , 1993 .

[25]  Marc F. P. Bierkens,et al.  Upscaling and downscaling methods for environmental research , 2000 .

[26]  D. Wolock,et al.  Effects of digital elevation model map scale and data resolution on a topography‐based watershed model , 1994 .

[27]  Gerald A. Nielsen,et al.  Global Positioning System Sampling Intensity and Pattern Effects on Computed Topographic Attributes , 1998 .

[28]  Peter A. Burrough,et al.  High-resolution landform classification using fuzzy k-means , 2000, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[29]  J. Gallant,et al.  A multiresolution index of valley bottom flatness for mapping depositional areas , 2003 .

[30]  Michael F. Hutchinson,et al.  Digital elevation models and representation of terrain shape , 2000 .

[31]  Gabriele Bitelli,et al.  Comparison of Techniques for Generating Digital Terrain Models from Contour Lines , 1997, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[32]  Carolyn J. Merry,et al.  Accuracy assessment of elevation data sets using the global positioning system , 1994 .

[33]  P. Bolstad,et al.  An evaluation of DEM accuracy: elevation, slope, and aspect , 1994 .

[34]  Stefan Kienzle,et al.  The Effect of DEM Raster Resolution on First Order, Second Order and Compound Terrain Derivatives , 2004, Trans. GIS.

[35]  Keith Beven,et al.  TOPMODEL : a critique. , 1997 .

[36]  Igor V. Florinsky,et al.  Determination of grid size for digital terrain modelling in landscape investigations—exemplified by soil moisture distribution at a micro-scale , 2000, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[37]  D. Montgomery,et al.  Digital elevation model grid size, landscape representation, and hydrologic simulations , 1994 .

[38]  P. Burrough,et al.  Principles of geographical information systems , 1998 .