Lessening the adverse effect of the semivariogram model selection on an interpolative survey using kriging technique

AbstractObjective Many parameters in environmental, scientific and human sciences investigations need to be interpolated. Geostatistics, with its structural analysis step, is widely used for this purpose. This precious step that evaluates data correlation and dependency is performed thanks to semivariogram. However, an incorrect choice of a semivariogram model can skew all the prediction results. The main objectives of this paper are (1) to simply illustrate the influence of the choice of an inappropriate semivariogram model and (2) to show how a best-fitted model can be selected. This may lessen the adverse effect of the semivariogram model selection on an interpolation survey using kriging technique.MethodsThe influence of the semivariogram model selection is highlighted and illustrated by thematic maps drawn using four different models (Gaussian, magnetic, spherical and exponential). Then, a guideline to select the most suitable model, using mean error (ME), mean square error (MSE), root mean square error (RMSE), average standard error (ASE), and root mean square standardized error (RMSSE), is proposed.ResultsThe choice of a semivariogram model seriously influences the results of a kriging survey at both endpoints and amplitude of the range of the estimated values. However, the direction of variation of the interpolated values is independent of the semivariogram model: different semivariogram models (with the same characteristics) produce different thematic maps but, the areas of minimum and maximum values remain unchanged. Yet, the suitable model can be selected by means of ME, MSE, RMSE, ASE and RMSSE.ConclusionThe present article illustrates how the use of an inappropriate semivariogram model can seriously distort the results of an evaluation, assessment or prediction survey. To avoid such an inconveniency, a methodical approach based on the computation and analysis of ME, RMSE, ASE, RMSSE and MSE is proposed.

[1]  A. Zakari,et al.  Aquifers productivity in the Pan-African context , 2015, Journal of Earth System Science.

[2]  G. Bellocchi,et al.  Assessment of the Spatial Uncertainty of Nitrates in the Aquifers of the Campania Plain (Italy) , 2013 .

[3]  David Gorsich,et al.  Variogram Model Selection via Nonparametric Derivative Estimation , 2000 .

[4]  J. Chilès,et al.  Geostatistics: Modeling Spatial Uncertainty , 1999 .

[5]  Mike Rees,et al.  5. Statistics for Spatial Data , 1993 .

[6]  Ahmad Mirabadi,et al.  Optimization of Sensor Orientation in Railway Wheel Detector, Using Kriging Method , 2011 .

[7]  Paul Zunkel.  The spatial extent and coverage of tornado sirens in San Marcos, Texas , 2015 .

[8]  Y. Xiong,et al.  Relationship between water-conservation behavior and water education in Guangzhou, China , 2015, Environmental Earth Sciences.

[9]  A. Bowman,et al.  On the Use of the Variogram in Checking for Independence in Spatial Data , 2001, Biometrics.

[10]  Robert A. Chaney,et al.  Spatial patterns of adolescent drug use , 2015 .

[11]  P. Njandjock Nouck,et al.  High iron concentration and pH change detected using statistics and geostatistics in crystalline basement equatorial region , 2015, Environmental Earth Sciences.

[12]  P. Kitanidis.  Introduction to Geostatistics: Applications in Hydrogeology , 1997 .

[13]  M. Jury,et al.  Spatial and temporal analysis of climate change in Hispañola , 2013, Theoretical and Applied Climatology.

[14]  Giuseppe Arbia,et al.  Editorial: Advances in the statistical modelling of spatial interaction data , 2013, Journal of Geographical Systems.

[15]  P. Njandjock Nouck,et al.  Assessment of groundwater quality in Yaoundé area, Cameroon, using geostatistical and statistical approaches , 2015, Environmental Earth Sciences.

[16]  S. Grady,et al.  Using simulated data to investigate the spatial patterns of obesity prevalence at the census tract level in metropolitan Detroit , 2015 .

[17]  Lepatio Tchieg Steve Alain,et al.  Investigation of Groundwater Quality Control in Adamawa-Cameroon Region , 2014 .

[18]  Michael Edward Hohn,et al.  An Introduction to Applied Geostatistics: by Edward H. Isaaks and R. Mohan Srivastava, 1989, Oxford University Press, New York, 561 p., ISBN 0-19-505012-6, ISBN 0-19-505013-4 (paperback), $55.00 cloth, $35.00 paper (US) , 1991 .

[19]  R. Reese.  Geostatistics for Environmental Scientists , 2001 .

[20]  Lepatio Tchieg Steve Alain,et al.  Climate Variability and its Possible Interactions with Water Resources in Central Africa , 2014 .

[21]  Niti B. Mishra,et al.  Spatio-temporal analysis of trends in seasonal vegetation productivity across Uttarakhand, Indian Himalayas, 2000–2014 , 2015 .

[22]  Jiahua Zhang,et al.  Vegetation dynamics in relation with climate over Nigeria from 1982 to 2011 , 2016, Environmental Earth Sciences.

[23]  Subhash Kumar,et al.  Spatial Distribution Analysis of Groundwater Quality Index Using GIS: A Case Study ofm Ranchi Municipal Corporation(RMC) Area , 2013 .

[24]  Binita Kc,et al.  Climate change vulnerability assessment in Georgia , 2015 .

[25]  Clayton V. Deutsch,et al.  GSLIB: Geostatistical Software Library and User's Guide , 1993 .

[26]  Giuseppe Arbia,et al.  Effects of scale in spatial interaction models , 2013, J. Geogr. Syst..

[27]  Timothy C. Coburn,et al.  Geostatistics for Natural Resources Evaluation , 2000, Technometrics.

[28]  S. Gupta,et al.  Statistical decision theory and related topics IV , 1988 .

[29]  J. W. van Groenigen,et al.  The influence of variogram parameters on optimal sampling schemes for mapping by kriging , 2000 .