Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Alters Elbow Flexor Muscle Recruitment Strategies

BACKGROUND Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is known to reliably alter motor cortical excitability in a polarity dependent fashion such that anodal stimulation increases cortical excitability and cathodal stimulation inhibits cortical excitability. However, the effect of tDCS on agonist and antagonist volitional muscle activation is currently not known. OBJECTIVE This study investigated the effect of motor cortical anodal tDCS on EMG/force relationships of biceps brachii (agonist) and triceps brachii (antagonist) using surface electromyography (EMG). METHODS Eighteen neurologically intact adults (9 tDCS and 9 controls) participated in this study. EMG/force relationships were established by having subjects perform submaximal isometric contractions at several force levels (12.5%, 25%, 37.5%, and 50% of maximum). RESULTS Results showed that anodal tDCS significantly affected the EMG/force relationship of the biceps brachii muscle. Specifically, anodal tDCS increased the magnitude of biceps brachii activation at 37.5% and 50% of maximum. Anodal tDCS also resulted in an increase in the peak force and EMG values during maximal contractions as compared to the control condition. EMG analyses of other elbow muscles indicated that the increase in biceps brachii activation after anodal tDCS was not related to alterations in synergistic or antagonistic muscle activity. CONCLUSIONS Our results indicate that anodal tDCS significantly affects the voluntary EMG/force relationship of the agonist muscles without altering the coactivation of the antagonistic muscles. The most likely explanation for the observed greater EMG per unit force after anodal tDCS appears to be related to alterations in motor unit recruitment strategies.

[1]  W Z Rymer,et al.  Abnormal force--EMG relations in paretic limbs of hemiparetic human subjects. , 1981, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[2]  Corticospinal tract integrity correlates with knee extensor weakness in chronic stroke survivors , 2011, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[3]  Abbey C. Thomas,et al.  Importance of Attenuating Quadriceps Activation Deficits After Total Knee Arthroplasty , 2012, Exercise and sport sciences reviews.

[4]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Pharmacological approach to the mechanisms of transcranial DC-stimulation-induced after-effects of human motor cortex excitability. , 2002, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[5]  J. Krakauer,et al.  Motor learning principles for neurorehabilitation. , 2013, Handbook of clinical neurology.

[6]  J. Krakauer,et al.  Consensus: Can transcranial direct current stimulation and transcranial magnetic stimulation enhance motor learning and memory formation? , 2008, Brain Stimulation.

[7]  Jean-Louis Thonnard,et al.  Single Session of Dual-tDCS Transiently Improves Precision Grip and Dexterity of the Paretic Hand After Stroke , 2014, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[8]  S. Lefebvre,et al.  Dual-tDCS Enhances Online Motor Skill Learning and Long-Term Retention in Chronic Stroke Patients , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[9]  J. Kent‐Braun,et al.  Slowed muscle contractile properties are not associated with a decreased EMG/force relationship in older humans. , 1999, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[10]  Christian Gerloff,et al.  Modulation of Training by Single-Session Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation to the Intact Motor Cortex Enhances Motor Skill Acquisition of the Paretic Hand , 2012, Stroke.

[11]  Ethan R. Buch,et al.  Noninvasive cortical stimulation enhances motor skill acquisition over multiple days through an effect on consolidation , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  Alvaro Pascual-Leone,et al.  Assessment and Modulation of Neural Plasticity in Rehabilitation With Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation , 2010, PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation.

[13]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Transcranial brain stimulation: clinical applications and future directions. , 2011, Neurosurgery clinics of North America.

[14]  S Laureys,et al.  [Transcranial direct current stimulation: a new tool for neurostimulation]. , 2013, Revue neurologique.

[15]  Dina Brooks,et al.  Voluntary activation failure contributes more to plantar flexor weakness than antagonist coactivation and muscle atrophy in chronic stroke survivors. , 2010, Journal of applied physiology.

[16]  S Marceglia,et al.  Improved isometric force endurance after transcranial direct current stimulation over the human motor cortical areas , 2007, The European journal of neuroscience.

[17]  Ping Zhou,et al.  Factors governing the form of the relation between muscle force and the EMG: a simulation study. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  R. Enoka,et al.  Influence of amplitude cancellation on the simulated surface electromyogram. , 2005, Journal of applied physiology.

[19]  A. Hendy,et al.  Anodal tDCS applied during strength training enhances motor cortical plasticity. , 2013, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[20]  B Bigland-Ritchie,et al.  EMG/FORCE RELATIONS AND FATIGUE OF HUMAN VOLUNTARY CONTRACTIONS , 1981, Exercise and sport sciences reviews.

[21]  A. Butler,et al.  A meta-analysis of the efficacy of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation for upper limb motor recovery in stroke survivors. , 2013, Journal of hand therapy : official journal of the American Society of Hand Therapists.

[22]  Rajiv Ranganathan,et al.  Extracting synergies in gait: using EMG variability to evaluate control strategies. , 2012, Journal of neurophysiology.

[23]  Glenn N. Williams,et al.  Factors explaining chronic knee extensor strength deficits after ACL reconstruction , 2011, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[24]  Chandramouli Krishnan,et al.  Variability in antagonist muscle activity and peak torque during isometric knee strength testing. , 2009, The Iowa orthopaedic journal.

[25]  Abbey C. Thomas,et al.  A Neuromuscular Mechanism of Posttraumatic Osteoarthritis Associated with ACL Injury , 2009, Exercise and sport sciences reviews.

[26]  V. Mathiowetz,et al.  Reliability and validity of grip and pinch strength evaluations. , 1984, The Journal of hand surgery.

[27]  J. Krakauer,et al.  Consensus: "Can tDCS and TMS enhance motor learning and memory formation?" , 2008, Brain stimulation.

[28]  Benjamin Kan,et al.  Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on elbow flexor maximal voluntary isometric strength and endurance. , 2013, Applied physiology, nutrition, and metabolism = Physiologie appliquee, nutrition et metabolisme.

[29]  Pablo Celnik,et al.  Effects of brain polarization on reaction times and pinch force in chronic stroke , 2006, BMC Neuroscience.

[30]  Dario Farina,et al.  Amplitude cancellation reduces the size of motor unit potentials averaged from the surface EMG. , 2006, Journal of applied physiology.

[31]  Louise Marston,et al.  Rethinking Clinical Trials of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: Participant and Assessor Blinding Is Inadequate at Intensities of 2mA , 2012, PloS one.

[32]  Chandramouli Krishnan,et al.  Quadriceps and hamstrings muscle control in athletic males and females , 2008, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[33]  Takashi Hanakawa,et al.  Enhancement of pinch force in the lower leg by anodal transcranial direct current stimulation , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[34]  H. Connor,et al.  Grip strength and hand dominance: challenging the 10% rule. , 1989, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[35]  Z. Ladin,et al.  Electrical stimulation of the thigh muscles after reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. Effects of electrically elicited contraction of the quadriceps femoris and hamstring muscles on gait and on strength of the thigh muscles. , 1991, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[36]  J. Born,et al.  Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation during Sleep Improves Declarative Memory , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[37]  H. Clamann,et al.  Elsevier/North-Holland Biomedical Press COMPARISON OF THE RECRUITMENT AND DISCHARGE PROPERTIES OF MOTOR UNITS IN H U M A N BRACHIAL BICEPS AND A D D U C T O R POLLICIS D U R I N G ISOMETRIC CONTRACTIONS , 2018 .

[38]  Pablo Celnik,et al.  Brain polarization enhances the formation and retention of motor memories. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[39]  Glenn N. Williams,et al.  Error associated with antagonist muscle activity in isometric knee strength testing , 2010, European Journal of Applied Physiology.

[40]  Rieko Osu,et al.  Single Session of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Transiently Increases Knee Extensor Force in Patients With Hemiparetic Stroke , 2011, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[41]  W. Kohrt,et al.  Early Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation to Improve Quadriceps Muscle Strength After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial , 2011, Physical Therapy.

[42]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Beyond the target area: remote effects of non‐invasive brain stimulation in humans , 2011, The Journal of physiology.

[43]  A. Nowicky,et al.  The effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on perception of effort in an isolated isometric elbow flexion task. , 2013, Motor control.

[44]  G. Somjen,et al.  FUNCTIONAL SIGNIFICANCE OF CELL SIZE IN SPINAL MOTONEURONS. , 1965, Journal of neurophysiology.

[45]  Thomas S Buchanan,et al.  Quadriceps Weakness, Atrophy, and Activation Failure in Predicted Noncopers after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury , 2005, The American journal of sports medicine.

[46]  J. Brasil-Neto.  Learning, Memory, and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation , 2012, Front. Psychiatry.

[47]  L. Snyder-Mackler,et al.  The use of neuromuscular electrical stimulation to improve activation deficits in a patient with chronic quadriceps strength impairments following total knee arthroplasty. , 2006, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[48]  D. Brooks,et al.  Neural and muscular determinants of dorsiflexor weakness in chronic stroke survivors. , 2013, Motor control.

[49]  James W. Stinear,et al.  Non-invasive brain stimulation enhances fine motor control of the hemiparetic ankle: implications for rehabilitation , 2011, Experimental Brain Research.

[50]  Nadia Bolognini,et al.  Using non-invasive brain stimulation to augment motor training-induced plasticity , 2009, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[51]  E. Henneman.  Relation between size of neurons and their susceptibility to discharge. , 1957, Science.

[52]  John W Krakauer,et al.  Probing for hemispheric specialization for motor skill learning: a transcranial direct current stimulation study. , 2011, Journal of neurophysiology.

[53]  Chandramouli Krishnan,et al.  Effect of knee position on quadriceps muscle force steadiness and activation strategies , 2011, Muscle & nerve.

[54]  F. Fregni,et al.  Systematic Review of Parameters of Stimulation, Clinical Trial Design Characteristics, and Motor Outcomes in Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation in Stroke , 2012, Front. Psychiatry.

[55]  Nina L. Suresh,et al.  Abnormal EMG-force slope estimates in the first dorsal interosseous of hemiparetic stroke survivors , 2008, 2008 30th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[56]  S. Kantak,et al.  Primary motor and premotor cortex in implicit sequence learning – evidence for competition between implicit and explicit human motor memory systems , 2012, The European journal of neuroscience.

[57]  N. Schweighofer,et al.  Task-Oriented Rehabilitation Robotics , 2012, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[58]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation , 2000, The Journal of physiology.

[59]  Glenn N. Williams,et al.  Sex differences in quadriceps and hamstrings EMG-moment relationships. , 2009, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[60]  O. Gosseries,et al.  La stimulation transcrânienne à courant continu : un nouvel outil de neurostimulation , 2013 .

[61]  V Achache,et al.  Effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation over the leg motor area on lumbar spinal network excitability in healthy subjects , 2011, The Journal of physiology.

[62]  R. Enoka,et al.  Motor-unit synchronization increases EMG amplitude and decreases force steadiness of simulated contractions. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.