Powered wheelchairs and scooters for outdoor mobility: a pilot study on costs and benefits
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] C. Löfqvist,et al. Mobility and mobility-related participation outcomes of powered wheelchair and scooter interventions after 4-months and 1-year use , 2012, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.
[2] A. Vanbiervliet,et al. Predictors of assistive technology use: The importance of personal and psychosocial factors , 2005, Disability and rehabilitation.
[3] A. Williams. EuroQol : a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life , 1990 .
[4] J. Jutai,et al. Development of a scale to measure the psychosocial impact of assistive devices: lessons learned and the road ahead , 2002, Disability and rehabilitation.
[5] Michelle Brasure,et al. Wheeled Mobility (Wheelchair) Service Delivery: Scope of the Evidence , 2012, Annals of Internal Medicine.
[6] L Demers,et al. Development of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with assistive Technology (QUEST). , 1996, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.
[7] Å. Brandt,et al. Older people's use of powered wheelchairs for activity and participation. , 2004, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.
[8] R Lee Kirby,et al. Ability of people with stroke to learn powered wheelchair skills: a pilot study. , 2010, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.
[9] Ingvor Pettersson,et al. The effect of an outdoor powered wheelchair on activity and participation in users with stroke , 2006, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.
[10] A. Frank,et al. Changes in the quality of life in severely disabled people following provision of powered indoor/outdoor chairs , 2003, Disability and rehabilitation.
[11] Susanne Iwarsson,et al. Towards an instrument targeting mobility-related participation: Nordic cross-national reliability. , 2008, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.
[12] Oskar Krantz,et al. Assistive devices utilisation in activities of everyday life – a proposed framework of understanding a user perspective , 2012, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.
[13] Luc Noreau,et al. Life-space mobility of middle-aged and older adults at various stages of usage of power mobility devices. , 2010, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.
[14] Å. Brandt,et al. Mobility devices to promote activity and participation: a systematic review. , 2009, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.
[15] Stephen Sprigle,et al. Activities of suppliers and technicians during the provision of complex and standard wheeled mobility devices , 2012, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.
[16] Ewa Wressle,et al. User satisfaction with mobility assistive devices: An important element in the rehabilitation process , 2008, Disability and rehabilitation.
[17] François Routhier,et al. Perceived impacts of a first wheelchair on social participation , 2012, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.
[18] Kersti A M Samuelsson,et al. Effects of lower limb prosthesis on activity, participation, and quality of life: a systematic review , 2012, Prosthetics and orthotics international.
[19] Claus Rydahl Torp,et al. [Where is the National Board of Health and Welfare?]. , 2003, Ugeskrift for laeger.
[20] P. Kersten,et al. Measuring autonomy in disabled people: validation of a new scale in a UK population , 2006, Clinical rehabilitation.
[21] Denise Reid,et al. Impact of Wheeled Seated Mobility Devices on Adult Users' and Their Caregivers' Occupational Performance: A Critical Literature Review , 2002, Canadian journal of occupational therapy. Revue canadienne d'ergotherapie.
[22] Marcel W M Post,et al. KWAZO, a new instrument to assess the quality of service delivery in assistive technology provision , 2006, Disability and rehabilitation.
[23] Kara Edwards,et al. A survey of adult power wheelchair and scooter users , 2010, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.