Strengthening Interprofessional Requirements Engineering Through Action Sheets: A Pilot Study

Background The importance of information and communication technology for healthcare is steadily growing. Newly developed tools are addressing different user groups: physicians, other health care professionals, social workers, patients, and family members. Since often many different actors with different expertise and perspectives are involved in the development process it can be a challenge to integrate the user-reported requirements of those heterogeneous user groups. Nevertheless, the understanding and consideration of user requirements is the prerequisite of building a feasible technical solution. In the course of the presented project it proved to be difficult to gain clear action steps and priorities for the development process out of the primary requirements compilation. Even if a regular exchange between involved teams took place there was a lack of a common language. Objective The objective of this paper is to show how the already existing requirements catalog was subdivided into specific, prioritized, and coherent working packages and the cooperation of multiple interprofessional teams within one development project was reorganized at the same time. In the case presented, the manner of cooperation was reorganized and a new instrument called an Action Sheet was implemented. This paper introduces the newly developed methodology which was meant to smooth the development of a user-centered software product and to restructure interprofessional cooperation. Methods There were 10 focus groups in which views of patients with colorectal cancer, physicians, and other health care professionals were collected in order to create a requirements catalog for developing a personal electronic health record. Data were audio- and videotaped, transcribed verbatim, and thematically analyzed. Afterwards, the requirements catalog was reorganized in the form of Action Sheets which supported the interprofessional cooperation referring to the development process of a personal electronic health record for the Rhine-Neckar region. Results In order to improve the interprofessional cooperation the idea arose to align the requirements arising from the implementation project with the method of software development applied by the technical development team. This was realized by restructuring the original requirements set in a standardized way and under continuous adjustment between both teams. As a result not only the way of displaying the user demands but also of interprofessional cooperation was steered in a new direction. Conclusions User demands must be taken into account from the very beginning of the development process, but it is not always obvious how to bring them together with IT knowhow and knowledge of the contextual factors of the health care system. Action Sheets seem to be an effective tool for making the software development process more tangible and convertible for all connected disciplines. Furthermore, the working method turned out to support interprofessional ideas exchange.

[1]  Jui-Jen Chen,et al.  A CMMI-based approach for medical software project life cycle study , 2013, SpringerPlus.

[2]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39 , 1989 .

[3]  Michelle O’Daniel,et al.  Professional Communication and Team Collaboration , 2008 .

[4]  David Heaney,et al.  The influence of context and process when implementing e-health , 2009, BMC Medical Informatics Decis. Mak..

[5]  Siti Salwah Salim,et al.  A framework to study requirements-driven collaboration among agile teams: Findings from two case studies , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[6]  Malina Jordanova,et al.  The International eHealth, Telemedicine and Health ICT Forum for Educational, Networking and Business , 2013 .

[7]  Oliver Heinze,et al.  The patients’ active role in managing a personal electronic health record: a qualitative analysis , 2015, Supportive Care in Cancer.

[8]  A. Barton,et al.  Patient Safety and Quality: An Evidence-Based Handbook for Nurses , 2009 .

[9]  Theodore D. Hellmann,et al.  Integrating Agile and User-Centered Design: A Systematic Mapping and Review of Evaluation and Validation Studies of Agile-UX , 2014, 2014 Agile Conference.

[10]  David Abramson,et al.  Special Theme: Project Management in E-Science: Challenges and Opportunities , 2011, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[11]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Usability and accessibility in consumer health informatics current trends and future challenges. , 2011, American journal of preventive medicine.

[12]  Reinhold Haux,et al.  Medical informatics: Past, present, future , 2010, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[13]  Frank Maurer,et al.  User-Centered Design and Agile Methods: A Systematic Review , 2011, 2011 AGILE Conference.

[14]  Giorgio De Michelis,et al.  User-driven prioritization of features for a prospective InterPersonal Health Record: Perceptions from the Italian context , 2015, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[15]  Maya Daneva,et al.  Handling requirements dependencies in agile projects: A focus group with agile software development practitioners , 2013, IEEE 7th International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS).

[16]  A. Abernethy,et al.  Importance of health information technology, electronic health records, and continuously aggregating data to comparative effectiveness research and learning health care. , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[17]  Seija Komi-Sirviö,et al.  Lessons learned by participants of distributed software development , 2005 .

[18]  Gunnar Ellingsen,et al.  A Review of 25 Years of CSCW Research in Healthcare: Contributions, Challenges and Future Agendas , 2012, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[19]  G. Andersson,et al.  Multimedia Appendix 1 , 2011 .

[20]  Kim M. Nazi The Personal Health Record Paradox: Health Care Professionals’ Perspectives and the Information Ecology of Personal Health Record Systems in Organizational and Clinical Settings , 2013, Journal of medical Internet research.

[21]  D. P. Baker,et al.  Teamwork as an essential component of high-reliability organizations. , 2006, Health services research.

[22]  Judith Segal Software Development Cultures and Cooperation Problems: A Field Study of the Early Stages of Development of Software for a Scientific Community , 2009, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[23]  Helena Karasti,et al.  Reflections on 25 Years of Ethnography in CSCW , 2012, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[24]  Douglas S. Bell,et al.  Interface design principles for usable decision support: A targeted review of best practices for clinical prescribing interventions , 2012, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[25]  Björn Bergh,et al.  Establishing a Personal Electronic Health Record in the Rhine-Neckar Region , 2009, MIE.

[26]  S. Lloyd,et al.  Project management in multi-disciplinary collaborative research , 2005, IPCC 2005. Proceedings. International Professional Communication Conference, 2005..

[27]  S. L. Star,et al.  This is Not a Boundary Object: Reflections on the Origin of a Concept , 2010 .

[28]  Ali Sunyaev,et al.  Usability of Patient-Centered Health IT: Mixed-Methods Usability Study of ePill , 2014, eHealth.

[29]  Claus Bossen,et al.  Boundary-Object Trimming: On the Invisibility of Medical Secretaries’ Care of Records in Healthcare Infrastructures , 2014, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[30]  Sabrina Marczak,et al.  A systematic literature review on agile requirements engineering practices and challenges , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[31]  Catherine H. Yu,et al.  Designing and evaluating an interprofessional shared decision-making and goal-setting decision aid for patients with diabetes in clinical care - systematic decision aid development and study protocol , 2014, Implementation Science.