Public Opinion, Domestic Structure, and Foreign Policy in Liberal Democracies

The paper discusses the role of public opinion in the foreign policy-making process of liberal democracies. Contrary to prevailing assumptions, public opinion matters. However, the impact of public opinion is determined not so much by the specific issues involved or by the particular pattern of public attitudes as by the domestic structure and the coalition-building processes among the elites in the respective country. The paper analyzes the public impact on the foreign policy-making process in four liberal democracies with distinct domestic structures: the United States, France, the Federal Republic of Germany, and Japan. Under the same international conditions and despite similar patterns of public attitudes, variances in foreign policy outcomes nevertheless occur; these have to be explained by differences in political institutions, policy networks, and societal structures. Thus, the four countries responded differently to Soviet policies during the 1980s despite more or less comparable trends in mass public opinion.

[1]  R. Lieber,et al.  Eagle entangled : U.S. foreign policy in a complex world , 1980 .

[2]  G. Ikenberry,et al.  Conclusion: an institutional approach to American foreign economic policy , 1988, International Organization.

[3]  Bruce E. Altschuler.  Political Culture and Public Opinion@@@Manipulating Public Opinion: Essays on Public Opinion As a Dependent Variable , 1990, American Political Science Review.

[4]  R. Dalton,et al.  Germany Transformed: Political Culture and the New Politics , 1981 .

[5]  M. Nincic.  The United States, the Soviet Union, and the Politics of Opposites , 1988, World Politics.

[6]  Bruce Russett,et al.  Controlling the Sword: The Democratic Governance of National Security , 1990 .

[7]  P. Gourevitch.  Politics In Hard Times , 1986 .

[8]  G. Ikenberry,et al.  The irony of state strength: comparative responses to the oil shocks in the 1970s , 1986, International Organization.

[9]  O. Holsti,et al.  The Domestic and Foreign Policy Beliefs of American Leaders , 1988 .

[10]  Peter Gourevitch,et al.  The second image reversed: the international sources of domestic politics , 1978, International Organization.

[11]  Commerce and Coalitions: How Trade Affects Domestic Political Alignments , 1991 .

[12]  S. V. Evera,et al.  Defense Policy and the Reagan Administration: Departure from Containment , 1983 .

[13]  Edwin O. Reischauer,et al.  The Foreign policy of modern Japan , 1978 .

[14]  T. Graham.  The Pattern and Importance of Public Knowledge in the Nuclear Age , 1988 .

[15]  Tom W. Smith.  The Polls: America's Most Important Problems Part I: National and International , 1985 .

[16]  E. Wittkopf.  Faces of Internationalism: Public Opinion and American Foreign Policy , 1991 .

[17]  M. Barnett.  High Politics is Low Politics: The Domestic and Systemic Sources of Israeli Security Policy, 1967–1977 , 1990, World Politics.

[18]  D. Bobrow.  Japan in the World , 1989 .

[19]  W. Wallace.  Defence and dissent in contemporary France , 1985 .

[20]  James N. Rosenau,et al.  New Directions in the Study of Foreign Policy , 1987 .

[21]  J. Mueller,et al.  War, presidents, and public opinion , 1973 .

[22]  S. Rosen.  Testing the theory of the military-industrial complex , 1973 .

[23]  H. Milner.  Resisting Protectionism: Global Industries and the Politics of International Trade , 1988 .

[24]  Benjamin I. Page,et al.  Foreign Policy and the Rational Public , 1988 .

[25]  Charles Tyroler.  Alerting America : the papers of the Committee on the Present Danger , 1985, American Political Science Review.

[26]  Vincent Wright,et al.  The government and politics of France , 1978 .

[27]  Stephen D. Krasner.  Defending the National Interest: Raw Materials Investments and U.S. Foreign Policy , 1978 .

[28]  S. Tarrow.  Struggle, Politics, and Reform: Collective Action, Social Movements, and Cycles of Protest , 1989 .

[29]  P. Katzenstein,et al.  Between Power And Plenty: Foreign Economic Policies Of Advanced Industrial States , 1978 .

[30]  John H. Aldrich,et al.  Foreign Affairs and Issue Voting: Do Presidential Candidates “Waltz Before a Blind Audience?” , 1989, American Political Science Review.

[31]  H. Rattinger,et al.  The Public and Atlantic Defense , 2021, The Public and Atlantic Defense.

[32]  P. Katzenstein,et al.  International relations and domestic structures: Foreign economic policies of advanced industrial states , 1976, International Organization.

[33]  Samuel Henry Barnes,et al.  Political Action: Mass Participation in Five Western Democracies , 1979 .

[34]  Herbert Kitschelt,et al.  Political Opportunity Structures and Political Protest: Anti-Nuclear Movements in Four Democracies , 1986, British Journal of Political Science.

[35]  Benjamin I. Page,et al.  Effects of Public Opinion on Policy , 1983, American Political Science Review.

[36]  C. Clemens,et al.  Reluctant Realists: The Christian Democrats and West German Ostpolitik , 1990 .

[37]  B. Hughes.  The domestic context of American foreign policy , 1979 .

[38]  John E. Lockwood.  Public Opinion and Foreign Policy. , 1950, American Journal of International Law.

[39]  Benjamin Ginsberg.  The captive public : how mass opinion promotes state power , 1987 .

[40]  Donald S. Zagoria,et al.  Crisis and Compensation: Public Policy and Political Stability in Japan, 1949-1986 , 1989 .

[41]  John F. Guilmartin,et al.  The Origin and Prevention of Major Wars: Domestic Politics and War , 1988 .

[42]  David A. Lake,et al.  Toward a Realist Theory of State Action , 1989 .