Corporate Social Responsibility in Management Research: Focus, Nature, Salience and Sources of Influence

In this paper we investigate the status of corporate social responsibility (CSR) research within the management literature. In particular, we examine the focus and nature of knowledge, the changing salience of this knowledge and the academic influences on the knowledge. We present empirical evidence based on publication and citation analyses of research published from 1992 to 2002. Our results demonstrate that, for CSR research published in management journals, the most popular issues investigated have been environmental and ethics; the empirical research has been overwhelmingly of a quantitative nature; the theoretical research has been primarily non-normative; the field is driven by agendas in the business environment as well as by continuing scientific engagement; and the single most important source of references for CSR articles was the management literature itself. Copyright Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2006.

[1]  M. Friedman.  The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits , 2007 .

[2]  Abagail McWilliams,et al.  The Balance of Trade Between Disciplines , 2005 .

[3]  K. Starkey,et al.  Rethinking the Business School , 2004 .

[4]  J. Moon,et al.  The Adoption of Voluntary Codes of Conduct in MNCs: A Three‐Country Comparative Study , 2004 .

[5]  Jeffrey Pfeffer,et al.  The Business School ‘Business’: Some Lessons from the US Experience* , 2004 .

[6]  Dirk Matten,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility Education in Europe , 2004, Journal of Business Ethics.

[7]  Jeffrey Pfeffer,et al.  The Business School Business: Some Lessons from the U.S. Experience , 2004 .

[8]  Jouni Korhonen,et al.  On the Ethics of Corporate Social Responsibility – Considering the Paradigm of Industrial Metabolism , 2003 .

[9]  A. Wicks,et al.  What Stakeholder Theory is Not , 2003 .

[10]  Lowell W. Busenitz,et al.  Entrepreneurship Research in Emergence: Past Trends and Future Directions , 2003 .

[11]  D. Wheeler,et al.  Focusing on Value: Reconciling Corporate Social Responsibility, Sustainability and a Stakeholder Approach in a Network World , 2003 .

[12]  R. Pieters,et al.  Who talks to whom? Intra-and interdisciplinary communication of economics journals , 2002 .

[13]  C. Cowton,et al.  The Teaching of Ethics in Management Accounting: Progress and Prospects , 2002 .

[14]  Abagail McWilliams,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility: a Theory of the Firm Perspective , 2001 .

[15]  Abagail McWilliams,et al.  Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: correlation or misspecification? , 2000 .

[16]  L. Spence.  Teaching business ethics: are there differences within Europe, and is there a European difference? , 2000 .

[17]  Abagail McWilliams,et al.  Issues in the Use of the Event Study Methodology: A Critical Analysis of Corporate Social Responsibility Studies , 1999 .

[18]  Diane L. Swanson,et al.  Toward an Integrative Theory of Business and Society: A Research Strategy for Corporate Social Performance , 1999 .

[19]  John Elkington,et al.  Partnerships from cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st‐century business , 1998 .

[20]  Thomas W. Dunfee,et al.  Report on Business Ethics in North America , 1997 .

[21]  Georges Enderle.  A Worldwide Survey of Business Ethics in the 1990s , 1997 .

[22]  H. V. Luijk.  Business Ethics in Western and Northern Europe: A Search for Effective Alliances , 1997 .

[23]  Abagail McWilliams,et al.  Event Studies In Management Research: Theoretical And Empirical Issues , 1997 .

[24]  S. Wartick,et al.  Business & Society/Business Ethics Courses , 1995 .

[25]  S. Stigler,et al.  The Journals of Economics , 1995, Journal of Political Economy.

[26]  J. Pfeffer.  Barriers to the Advance of Organizational Science: Paradigm Development as a Dependent Variable , 1993 .

[27]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[28]  K. Eisenhardt.  Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review , 1989 .

[29]  R. Freeman.  Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach , 2010 .

[30]  Richard Whitley,et al.  THE SCIENTIFIC STATUS OF MANAGEMENT RESEARCH AS A PRACTICALLY‐ORIENTED SOCIAL SCIENCE , 1984 .

[31]  Richard Whitley,et al.  THE FRAGMENTED STATE OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES: REASONS AND CONSEQUENCES , 1984 .

[32]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .