The Mysterious Whiteboard

This paper raises the question of why electronic whiteboards are not ubiquitous. The paper provides a design-oriented analysis of traditional as well as electronic whiteboards in the context of collaborative and individual activities. We offer a novel perspective on whiteboards for collaborative activity based on a survey of the electronic whiteboard literature, a series of interviews with users of traditional whiteboards, and concepts rooted in Activity Theory. We identify a number of characteristics of the non-electronic whiteboard that are important to understand and preserve in the design of electronic whiteboard systems. Most importantly, we argue that the strength of non-electronic whiteboards is a combination of their simplicity and stability as well as a discontinuity between material on and outside of the whiteboard. We argue that the non-electronic whiteboard has uses and properties, which will require an electronic substitute to differ fundamentally in design compared to our traditional personal computing devices as well as most designs seen today. We present a set of themes for design of future electronic whiteboard systems that emphasize limitations as a main design principle. We conclude with three principles for design: The idea of installation rather than application; the principle of supplementing rather than replacing; and finally the principle of embracing and enhancing discontinuities.

[1]  Steve Higgins,et al.  Interactive whiteboards: boon or bandwagon? A critical review of the literature , 2005, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[2]  Saul Greenberg,et al.  Supporting transitions in work: informing large display application design by understanding whiteboard use , 2009, GROUP.

[3]  Eric Saund Bringing the Marks on a Whiteboard to Electronic Life , 1999, CoBuild.

[4]  S. Bly,et al.  Commune: a shared drawing surface , 1990, COCS '90.

[5]  Daniel G. Bobrow,et al.  Beyond the chalkboard: computer support for collaboration and problem solving in meetings , 1988, CACM.

[6]  Susanne Bødker,et al.  Cooperation in massively distributed information space , 2001, ECSCW.

[7]  Joshua Susser,et al.  Byte guide to OpenDoc , 1996 .

[8]  Jakob E. Bardram,et al.  Peri-operative Coordination and Communication Systems : A Case of CSCW in Medical Informatics , 2009 .

[9]  James H. Aylor,et al.  Computer for the 21st Century , 1999, Computer.

[10]  Scott Carter,et al.  Let's go from the whiteboard: supporting transitions in work through whiteboard capture and reuse , 2010, CHI.

[11]  Julia Gillen,et al.  Interactive whiteboards : does new technology transform teaching? , 2010 .

[12]  Yvonne Dittrich,et al.  Social Thinking - Software Practice , 2002, Social Thinking - Software Practice.

[13]  S. Ludvigsen,et al.  Learning Across Sites : New Tools, Infrastructures and Practices , 2010 .

[14]  John C. Tang,et al.  Liveboard: a large interactive display supporting group meetings, presentations, and remote collaboration , 1992, CHI.

[15]  Thomas P. Moran,et al.  Tivoli: an electronic whiteboard for informal workgroup meetings , 1993, INTERCHI.

[16]  Takeo Igarashi,et al.  Flatland: new dimensions in office whiteboards , 1999, CHI '99.

[17]  Christian Heide Damm,et al.  Tool support for cooperative object-oriented design: gesture based modelling on an electronic whiteboard , 2000, CHI.

[18]  S. Blinkhorn The writing is on the wall , 1993, Nature.

[19]  Hannah Slay,et al.  Interactive whiteboards: Real beauty or just "lipstick"? , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[20]  André van der Hoek,et al.  Software design sketching with calico , 2010, ASE.