Optimization of aeration profiles in the activated sludge process

Abstract We show that the aeration rate in the activated sludge process, which is responsible for the greatest energy burden (up to 50%) in wastewater treatment, can be reduced by more than 60%, while preserving an effluent quality of less than 0.10 mg/L of ammonia and more than 8.5 mg/L of dissolved oxygen. An in-depth survey of the performances of different aeration profiles is given through utilization of an activated sludge tank model that was calibrated and validated with data from a real plant. First, the total rate of aeration is manipulated while employing equal rates of local aeration across the activated sludge tank. Then, scenarios with a nonuniform distribution of local aeration rates are investigated. For this purpose, a mixed-integer nonlinear programming (MINLP) problem was devised to minimize computational burden, which was solved using a genetic algorithm. Also, a similar MINLP problem was set to obtain aeration profiles with segments of equally aerated zones in the tank, which can facilitate execution in real plants. Finally, all aeration profiles were challenged with a 2-day storm through dynamic simulations.

[1]  W. Owen.  Energy in wastewater treatment , 1982 .

[2]  Darrell Whitley,et al.  A genetic algorithm tutorial , 1994, Statistics and Computing.

[3]  P A Vanrolleghem,et al.  Status and future trends of ICA in wastewater treatment--a European perspective. , 2002, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[4]  Kazimierz Duzinkiewicz,et al.  Hierarchical dissolved oxygen control for activated sludge processes , 2008 .

[5]  Pernille Ingildsen,et al.  Realising full-scale control in wastewater treatment systems using in situ nutrient sensors , 2002 .

[6]  Peter J. Fleming,et al.  The MATLAB genetic algorithm toolbox , 1995 .

[7]  Benoît Chachuat,et al.  Optimal aeration control of industrial alternating activated sludge plants , 2005 .

[8]  Mogens Henze,et al.  Activated sludge models ASM1, ASM2, ASM2d and ASM3 , 2015 .

[9]  F. Teymour,et al.  Bifurcation Analysis of Wastewater Treatment Processes , 2014 .

[10]  S. Weijers.  Modelling, identification and control of activated sludge plants for nitrogen removal , 2000 .

[11]  B. Carlsson,et al.  Optimal aeration control in a nitrifying activated sludge process. , 2012, Water research.

[12]  Benoît Chachuat,et al.  Dynamic optimisation of small size wastewater treatment plants including nitrification and denitrification processes , 2001 .

[13]  M. A. Latifi,et al.  Optimal operation of alternating activated sludge processes , 2005 .

[14]  I. Venner,et al.  Energy Efficiency Strategies for Municipal Wastewater Treatment Facilities , 2012 .

[15]  Robert D. Hill,et al.  Sensing and Control Systems: A Review of Municipal and Industrial Experiences , 2002 .

[16]  Leiv Rieger,et al.  Improving Nutrient Removal While Reducing Energy Use at Three Swiss WWTPs Using Advanced Control , 2012, Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation.

[17]  Frank R. Spellman,et al.  Handbook of Water and Wastewater Treatment Plant Operations , 2003 .

[18]  W. Gujer,et al.  Activated sludge model No. 3 , 1995 .