Development and Testing of the MyHealthyPregnancy App: A Behavioral Decision Research-Based Tool for Assessing and Communicating Pregnancy Risk

Background Despite significant advances in medical interventions and health care delivery, preterm births in the United States are on the rise. Existing research has identified important, seemingly simple precautions that could significantly reduce preterm birth risk. However, it has proven difficult to communicate even these simple recommendations to women in need of them. Our objective was to draw on methods from behavioral decision research to develop a personalized smartphone app-based medical communication tool to assess and communicate pregnancy risks related to preterm birth. Objective A longitudinal, prospective pilot study was designed to develop an engaging, usable smartphone app that communicates personalized pregnancy risk and gathers risk data, with the goal of decreasing preterm birth rates in a typically hard-to-engage patient population. Methods We used semistructured interviews and user testing to develop a smartphone app based on an approach founded in behavioral decision research. For usability evaluation, 16 participants were recruited from the outpatient clinic at a major academic hospital specializing in high-risk pregnancies and provided a smartphone with the preloaded app and a digital weight scale. Through the app, participants were queried daily to assess behavioral risks, mood, and symptomology associated with preterm birth risk. Participants also completed monthly phone interviews to report technical problems and their views on the app’s usefulness. Results App use was higher among participants at higher risk, as reflected in reporting poorer daily moods (Odds ratio, OR 1.20, 95% CI 0.99-1.47, P=.08), being more likely to smoke (OR 4.00, 95% CI 0.93-16.9, P=.06), being earlier in their pregnancy (OR 1.07, 95% CI 1.02-1.12, P=.005), and having a lower body mass index (OR 1.07, 95% CI 1.00-1.15, P=.05). Participant-reported intention to breastfeed increased from baseline to the end of the trial, t15=−2.76, P=.01. Participants’ attendance at prenatal appointments was 84% compared with the clinic norm of 50%, indicating a conservatively estimated cost savings of ~US $450/patient over 3 months. Conclusions Our app is an engaging method for assessing and communicating risk during pregnancy in a typically hard-to-reach population, providing accessible and personalized distant obstetrical care, designed to target preterm birth risk, specifically.

[1]  J. Martin,et al.  Births: final data for 2004. , 2006, National vital statistics reports : from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, National Vital Statistics System.

[2]  T. Kamarck,et al.  A global measure of perceived stress. , 1983, Journal of health and social behavior.

[3]  V. Berghella,et al.  Cerclage for Short Cervix on Ultrasonography in Women With Singleton Gestations and Previous Preterm Birth: A Meta-Analysis , 2011, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[4]  Floyd J. Fowler,et al.  Improving Survey Questions: Design and Evaluation , 1995 .

[5]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Judgment and decision making. , 2012, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science.

[6]  J. Cox,et al.  Validation of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) in non-postnatal women. , 1996, Journal of affective disorders.

[7]  J. Martin,et al.  Births in the United States, 2015. , 2016, NCHS data brief.

[8]  G. Koren,et al.  Predictors of Prenatal Multivitamin Adherence in Pregnant Women , 2009, Journal of clinical pharmacology.

[9]  Stanley Presser,et al.  SURVEY PRETESTING: DO DIFFERENT METHODS PRODUCE DIFFERENT RESULTS? , 1994 .

[10]  Borja Martínez-Pérez,et al.  Mobile Health Applications for the Most Prevalent Conditions by the World Health Organization: Review and Analysis , 2013, Journal of medical Internet research.

[11]  Clayton Lewis,et al.  Designing for usability—key principles and what designers think , 1983, CHI '83.

[12]  A. Haines,et al.  The Effectiveness of Mobile-Health Technology-Based Health Behaviour Change or Disease Management Interventions for Health Care Consumers: A Systematic Review , 2013, PLoS medicine.

[13]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  Behavioral decision research: A constructive processing perspective. , 1992 .

[14]  R. Kravitz,et al.  Patient Participation in Medical Consultations: Why Some Patients are More Involved Than Others , 2005, Medical care.

[15]  J. Rosser Antibiotics for asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnancy. , 2001, The practising midwife.

[16]  Sari Kujala,et al.  User involvement: A review of the benefits and challenges , 2003, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[17]  Laura Johnson,et al.  How Many Interviews Are Enough? , 2006 .

[18]  J. Martin,et al.  Births: final data for 2003. , 2005, National vital statistics reports : from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, National Vital Statistics System.

[19]  W. Edwards Behavioral decision theory. , 1961, Annual review of psychology.

[20]  R. P. Heine,et al.  Prevention of recurrent preterm delivery by 17 alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  J. Sinacore,et al.  HITS: a short domestic violence screening tool for use in a family practice setting. , 1998, Family medicine.