Integrating bioassays and analytical chemistry as an improved approach to support safety assessment of food contact materials

ABSTRACT Food contact materials (FCM) contain chemicals which can migrate into food and result in human exposure. Although it is mandatory to ensure that migration does not endanger human health, there is still no consensus on how to pragmatically assess the safety of FCM since traditional approaches would require extensive toxicological and analytical testing which are expensive and time consuming. Recently, the combination of bioassays, analytical chemistry and risk assessment has been promoted as a new paradigm to identify toxicologically relevant molecules and address safety issues. However, there has been debate on the actual value of bioassays in that framework. In the present work, a FCM anticipated to release the endocrine active chemical 4-nonyphenol (4NP) was used as a model. In a migration study, the leaching of 4NP was confirmed by LC-MS/MS and GC-MS. This was correlated with an increase in both estrogenic and anti-androgenic activities as measured with bioassays. A standard risk assessment indicated that according to the food intake scenario applied, the level of 4NP measured was lower, close or slightly above the acceptable daily intake. Altogether these results show that bioassays could reveal the presence of an endocrine active chemical in a real-case FCM migration study. The levels reported were relevant for safety assessment. In addition, this work also highlighted that bioactivity measured in migrate does not necessarily represent a safety issue. In conclusion, together with analytics, bioassays contribute to identify toxicologically relevant molecules leaching from FCM and enable improved safety assessment.

[1]  S. Koster,et al.  GUIDANCE ON BEST PRACTICES ON THE RISK ASSESSMENT OF NON-INTENTIONALLY ADDED SUBSTANCES (NIAS) IN FOOD CONTACT MATERIALS AND ARTICLES , 2015 .

[2]  Abraham Brouwer,et al.  Development of androgen- and estrogen-responsive bioassays, members of a panel of human cell line-based highly selective steroid-responsive bioassays. , 2004, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[3]  WLyon ACRS,et al.  Safety evaluation , 1978 .

[4]  Monique A J Rennen,et al.  Application of the threshold of toxicological concern (TTC) concept to the safety assessment of chemically complex food matrices. , 2011, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[5]  H. Hollert,et al.  Chlorinated isomers of nonylphenol differ in estrogenic and androgenic activity , 2011, Journal of environmental science and health. Part A, Toxic/hazardous substances & environmental engineering.

[6]  M. Andersson,et al.  Safety evaluation of food contact paper and board using chemical tests and in vitro bioassays: role of known and unknown substances , 2010, Food additives & contaminants. Part A, Chemistry, analysis, control, exposure & risk assessment.

[7]  P. Cozzini,et al.  Hazard assessment through hybrid in vitro / in silico approach: The case of zearalenone. , 2015, ALTEX.

[8]  Inorganic Fluorides PRIORITY SUBSTANCES LIST ASSESSMENT REPORT , 2001 .

[9]  T. Delatour,et al.  LC-MS/MS analytical procedure to quantify tris(nonylphenyl)phosphite, as a source of the endocrine disruptors 4-nonylphenols, in food packaging materials , 2014, Food additives & contaminants. Part A, Chemistry, analysis, control, exposure & risk assessment.

[10]  J. Olsen,et al.  The European Commission , 2020, The European Union.

[11]  Juliette Legler,et al.  Optimization and prevalidation of the in vitro ERalpha CALUX method to test estrogenic and antiestrogenic activity of compounds. , 2010, Reproductive toxicology.

[12]  B. Muilwijk,et al.  A novel safety assessment strategy for non-intentionally added substances (NIAS) in carton food contact materials , 2014, Food additives & contaminants. Part A, Chemistry, analysis, control, exposure & risk assessment.

[13]  Anne Marie Vinggaard,et al.  Non-targeted screening for contaminants in paper and board food-contact materials using effect-directed analysis and accurate mass spectrometry , 2016, Food additives & contaminants. Part A, Chemistry, analysis, control, exposure & risk assessment.

[14]  M. Tacker,et al.  Characterization of Estrogen and Androgen Activity of Food Contact Materials by Different In Vitro Bioassays (YES, YAS, ERα and AR CALUX) and Chromatographic Analysis (GC-MS, HPLC-MS) , 2014, PloS one.

[15]  M. Biedermann,et al.  Food Contamination with Organic Materials in Perspective: Packaging Materials as the Largest and Least Controlled Source? A View Focusing on the European Situation , 2006, Critical reviews in food science and nutrition.

[16]  K. Wennerberg,et al.  Bioluminescent, Nonlytic, Real-Time Cell Viability Assay and Use in Inhibitor Screening , 2015, Assay and drug development technologies.

[17]  Yasuo Fujimoto,et al.  Syntheses and estrogenic activity of 4-nonylphenol isomers. , 2008, Chemosphere.

[18]  Tobias Schulze,et al.  Effect-directed analysis supporting monitoring of aquatic environments--An in-depth overview. , 2016, The Science of the total environment.

[19]  B. V. van Vugt-Lussenburg,et al.  Incorporation of a metabolizing system in biodetection assays for endocrine active substances. , 2017, ALTEX.

[20]  Flavourings Recent developments in the risk assessment of chemicals in food and their potential impact on the safety assessment of substances used in food contact materials , 2016 .

[21]  B. Schilter,et al.  Differentiating true androgen receptor inhibition from cytotoxicity-mediated reduction of reporter-gene transactivation in-vitro. , 2017, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.