Choosing models for soil chronofunctions and fitting them to data

Summary The effectiveness and utility of soil chronofunctions is examined in the light of existing pedogenic theory. Statistical treatments applied in chronofunction research are reviewed, including linear transformations of raw data, which may improve the utility of the chronofunction. We advocate using a particular statistical model only if it can be justified based on our current understanding of the functioning of the pedologic system. We emphasize the potential difficulties of using linear chronofunction methods; simple linear and logarithmic functions are not always the best option for chronofunctions. Hyperbolic, polynomial or nonlinear functions might improve not only the fit of the chronofunction but also advance our understanding of the pedologic system. When the chronofunction explaining the most variance is not best suited to a process-based understanding of pedogenic theory, other functions with slightly smaller r2 values that have been judged suitable by a priori reasoning or theory might better reflect the functioning of the pedologic system. We justify limited extrapolation of some chronofunctions to time zero and discuss how this can be useful in the identification of pedogenic thresholds and ‘step functions’. Interpretation of the Y-intercept of chronofunctions can, at times, aid our understanding of the soil system near time zero and be useful in the identification of the existence and timing of thresholds.

[1]  J. Phillips Progressive and Regressive Pedogenesis and Complex Soil Evolution , 1993, Quaternary Research.

[2]  J. Phillips Stability implications of the state factor model of soils as a nonlinear dynamical system , 1993 .

[3]  D. H. Yaalon,et al.  Stages and rate of the gravel shattering process by salts in desert Reg soils , 1993 .

[4]  Antony Mellor,et al.  Variations in weathering processes and rates with time in a chronosequence of soils from Glen Feshie, Scotland , 1993 .

[5]  D. H. Yaalon ON FORTUITOUS RESULTS AND COMPENSATING ERRORS , 1992 .

[6]  R. Schaetzl,et al.  An examination of podzolization near Lake Michigan using chronofunctions , 1992 .

[7]  D. H. Yaalon,et al.  FUNCTIONS ARE NOT ALWAYS WHAT THEY APPEAR TO BE: A COMMENT ON “SOILS DEVELOPED IN LATE PLEISTOCENE TILL, MEDICINE BOW MOUNTAINS, WYOMING” , 1992 .

[8]  R. Graham,et al.  Morphologic Development and Clay Redistribution in Lysimeter Soils under Chaparral and Pine , 1991 .

[9]  L. Munn,et al.  SOILS DEVELOPED IN LATE PLEISTOCENE TILL, MEDICINE BOW MOUNTAINS, WYOMING , 1991 .

[10]  D. Merritts,et al.  Rates and processes of soil evolution on uplifted marine terraces, northern California , 1991 .

[11]  E. Dambrine,et al.  Study of current soil-forming processes using bags of vermiculite and resins placed within soil horizons , 1991 .

[12]  R. Weldon,et al.  Spatial soil variability in the Cajon Pass chronosequence: implications for the use of soils as a geochronological tool , 1990 .

[13]  J. Bockheim Soil development rates in the Transantarctic Mountains. , 1990 .

[14]  J. Bockheim,et al.  A Review of Pedogenic Zonation in Well-Drained Soils of the Southern Circumpolar Region , 1990, Quaternary Research.

[15]  T. Rockwell,et al.  Dynamic Pedogenesis: New Views on Some Key Soil Concepts, and a Model for Interpreting Quaternary Soils , 1990, Quaternary Research.

[16]  R. Schaetzl Effects of treethrow microtopography on the characteristics and genesis of Spodosols, Michigan, USA. , 1990 .

[17]  W. H. Johnson Ice-Wedge Casts and Relict Patterned Ground in Central Illinois and their Environmental Significance , 1990, Quaternary Research.

[18]  J. Harden,et al.  Development Rates of Late Quaternary Soils, Silver Lake Playa, California , 1989 .

[19]  Donald G. Baker,et al.  Temperature Change in Eastern Minnesota , 1989 .

[20]  Jonathan D. Phillips,et al.  An evaluation of the state factor model of soil ecosystems , 1989 .

[21]  V. Holliday Genesis of a Late-Holocene Soil Chronosequence at the Lubbock Lake Archaeological Site, Texas , 1988 .

[22]  R. Schaetzl,et al.  A NUMERICAL INDEX OF PODZOL AND PODZOLIC SOIL DEVELOPMENT , 1988 .

[23]  A. Busacca Pedogenesis of a chronosequence in the Sacramento Valley, California, U.S.A., I. Application of a soil development index , 1987 .

[24]  L. Lavkulich,et al.  A SOIL CHRONOSEQUENCE ON BEACH SANDS, VANCOUVER ISLAND, BRITISH COLUMBIA , 1987 .

[25]  A. Mellor A pedogenic investigation of some soil chronosequences on neoglacial moraine ridges, southern Norway: Examination of soil chemical data using principal components analysis , 1987 .

[26]  D. L. Johnson,et al.  EVOLUTION MODEL OF PEDOGENESIS , 1987 .

[27]  R. Weldon,et al.  Rates and processes of soil development on Quaternary terraces in Cajon Pass, California , 1987 .

[28]  A. Mellor A micromorphological examination of two alpine soil chronosequences, Southern Norway , 1986 .

[29]  A. Mellor Soil chronosequences on Neoglacial moraine ridges, Jostedalsbreen and Jotunheimen, southern Norway: a quantitative pedogenic approach , 1985 .

[30]  L. Mcfadden,et al.  Changes in the Content and Composition of Pedogenic Iron Oxyhydroxides in a Chronosequence of Soils in Southern California , 1985, Quaternary Research.

[31]  P. Birkeland Holocene soil chronofunctions, Southern Alps, New Zealand , 1984 .

[32]  D. Muhs,et al.  INTRINSIC THRESHOLDS IN SOIL SYSTEMS , 1984 .

[33]  P. Birkeland,et al.  Soils and Geomorphology , 1984 .

[34]  R. Protz,et al.  RATE OF PODZOLIC SOIL FORMATION NEAR HUDSON BAY, ONTARIO , 1984 .

[35]  Terry E. Stransky Comments and Reply on “Improper use of regression equations in earth sciences” , 1984 .

[36]  J. Harden,et al.  A Quantitative Comparison of Soil Development in Four Climatic Regimes , 1983, Quaternary Research.

[37]  M. Sondheim,et al.  NUMERICAL ANALYSIS OF A CHRONOSEQUENCE INCLUDING AN ASSESSMENT OF VARIABILITY , 1983 .

[38]  G. Williams Improper use of regression equations in earth sciences , 1983 .

[39]  E. Levine,et al.  Soil Development in Till of Various Ages in Northeastern Pennsylvania , 1983, Quaternary Research.

[40]  D. Muhs A soil chronosequence on quaternary marine terraces, san clemente island, california , 1982 .

[41]  J. Bockheim Properties of a chronosequence of ultraxerous soils in the trans-antarctic mountains , 1982 .

[42]  J. Harden A quantitative index of soil development from field descriptions: Examples from a chronosequence in central California , 1982 .

[43]  L. Lavkulich,et al.  Numerical Analysis of a Chronosequence, Including the Development of a Chronofunction1 , 1981 .

[44]  W. T. Ward,et al.  Chemical and mineralogical trends in a chronosequence developed on alluvium in eastern Victoria, Australia , 1981 .

[45]  J. Bockheim Solution and use of chronofunctions in studying soil development , 1980 .

[46]  H. Birks,et al.  Soil Development on Recent End Moraines of the Klutlan Glacier, Yukon Territory, Canada , 1980, Quaternary Research.

[47]  W. D. Nettleton,et al.  Feedback processes in soil genesis , 1978 .

[48]  W. J. Vreeken PRINCIPAL KINDS OF CHRONOSEQUENCES AND THEIR SIGNIFICANCE IN SOIL HISTORY , 1975 .

[49]  D. H. Yaalon,et al.  Conceptual models in pedogenesis: Can soil-forming functions be solved? , 1975 .

[50]  J. W. Gorman,et al.  Fitting Equations to Data. , 1973 .

[51]  David W. Bacon,et al.  Estimating the transition between two intersecting straight lines , 1971 .

[52]  P. Stevens,et al.  The Chronosequence Concept and Soil Formation , 1970, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[53]  R. B. Parsons,et al.  Soil Development and Geomorphic Surfaces, Willamette Valley, Oregon , 1970 .

[54]  P. H. Walker Postglacial environments in relation to landscape and soils on the Cary drift, Iowa , 1966 .

[55]  K. Wilson The time factor in the development of dune soils at South Haven peninsula, Dorset. , 1960 .

[56]  R. L. Crocker,et al.  SOIL DEVELOPMENT IN RELATION TO VEGETATION AND SURFACE AGE AT GLACIER BAY, ALASKA* , 1955 .

[57]  R. L. Crocker Soil Genesis and the Pedogenic Factors , 1952, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[58]  K. Bryan,et al.  Soil Phenomena as Evidence of Climatic Changes , 1943 .

[59]  H. Jenny Factors of Soil Formation , 1941 .

[60]  R. Schaetzl,et al.  SOIL DEVELOPMENT AND SPATIAL VARIABILITY ON GEOMORPHIC SURFACES OF DIFFERENT AGE , 1993 .

[61]  R. K. Mark,et al.  A statistical method for estimating rates of soil development and ages of geologic deposits: A design for soil-chronosequence studies , 1988 .

[62]  L. Koutaniemi,et al.  Podzolization as studied from terraces of various ages in two river valleys, Northern Finland. , 1988 .

[63]  D. Dethier The soil chronosequence along the Cowlitz River, Washington , 1988 .

[64]  L. James RATES OF ORGANIC CARBON ACCUMULATION IN YOUNG MINERAL SOILS NEAR BURROUGHS GLACIER, GLACIER BAY, ALASKA , 1988 .

[65]  P. Birkeland,et al.  Holocene alpine soils in gneissic cirque deposits, Colorado Front Range , 1987 .

[66]  I. Little Numerical analysis of soil development in a chronosequence on Fraser Island, southeastern Queensland , 1986 .

[67]  J. Harden,et al.  Soils developed on coastal and fluvial terraces near Ventura, California , 1986 .

[68]  R. H. Myers Classical and modern regression with applications , 1986 .

[69]  L. Wilding,et al.  Chapter 4 - Spatial Variability and Pedology , 1983 .

[70]  R. V. Ruhe Quaternary landscapes in Iowa , 1969 .

[71]  R. L. Crocker The Plant Factor in Soil Formation , 1967 .

[72]  R. F. Chandler The Time Required for Podzol Profile Formation as Evidenced by the Mendenhall Glacial Deposits Near Juneau, Alaska 1 , 1943 .

[73]  H. Jenny Calcium in the Soil: III. Pedologic Relations 1 , 1942 .