Developing clinical performance measures based on the Dialysis Outcomes Quality Initiative Clinical Practice Guidelines: process, outcomes, and implications.

BACKGROUND The National Kidney Foundation-Dialysis Outcomes Quality Initiative (NKF-DOQI) Clinical Practice Guidelines established a widely accepted set of recommendations for high-quality dialysis care. To enhance the End-Stage Renal Disease Core Indicators Project, an ongoing effort to assess and improve dialysis care in the United States, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) commissioned a project to develop clinical performance measures (CPMs) based on the NKF-DOQI guidelines. METHODS The CMS contracted with Qualis Health, a private nonprofit organization serving as a Medicare Quality Improvement Organization, to facilitate a 9-month project to develop dialysis CPMs with the participation of a broad range of stakeholders from the renal community. Work groups were established to develop CPMs addressing 4 areas: hemodialysis adequacy, peritoneal dialysis adequacy, vascular access management, and anemia management. The NKF-DOQI guidelines were prioritized based on the strength of the evidence supporting the guidelines, the feasibility of developing performance measures, and the significance of the areas addressed to the quality of care delivered to dialysis patients. Expert panels developed data specifications, sampling approaches, data-collection tools, and analytic strategies. RESULTS Sixteen CPMs were developed based on 22 of 114 NKF-DOQI guidelines. After establishing reliability through field-testing of data-collection instruments, the CPMs were applied to a sample of 8,838 randomly selected hemodialysis patients and 1,650 randomly selected adult peritoneal dialysis patients in summer 1999. CONCLUSION The development of CPMs based on the NKF-DOQI Clinical Practice Guidelines for dialysis care was accomplished in a timely and effective manner by engaging a broad range of stakeholders and technical experts. The CPMs are important tools to assess and improve the quality of dialysis care in the United States. Few comparable efforts exist in other fields of medicine.

[1]  G. Eknoyan,et al.  Methods used to evaluate the quality of evidence underlying the National Kidney Foundation-Dialysis Outcomes Quality Initiative Clinical Practice Guidelines: description, findings, and implications. , 2000, American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation.

[2]  M. Sandra Wood,et al.  Health care financing administration , 2000 .

[3]  E. Steinberg The importance of performance evaluation in implementation of the Dialysis Outcomes Quality Initiative Guidelines. , 1999, Advances in renal replacement therapy.

[4]  S. Shortell,et al.  Crossing the quality chasm: implications for health services administration education. , 2004, The Journal of health administration education.

[5]  A. Kliger,et al.  Clinical practice guidelines in end-stage renal disease: a strategy for implementation. , 1999, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN.

[6]  D. Ballard,et al.  A Data-Driven Approach to Improving the Care of In-Center Hemodialysis Patients , 1995, Health care financing review.

[7]  D. Baker,et al.  Phase II of the AHCPR-sponsored heart failure guideline: translating practice recommendations into review criteria. , 1996, The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement.

[8]  W. McClellan,et al.  Improvement in adequacy of delivered dialysis for adult in-center hemodialysis patients in the United States, 1993 to 1995. , 1997, American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation.