Microstructured thin-film electrode technology enables proof of concept of scalable, soft auditory brainstem implants

Engineered conformability in auditory brainstem implant electrode arrays improves the electrode-brainstem interface in mice and in human cadavers. Beneficial bending Some people with deafness receive auditory brainstem implants (ABIs), neurotechnology that directly stimulates the cochlear nucleus (CN). Unfortunately, auditory outcomes after implantation are limited, possibly due to mismatch between the stiffness of the implant and the CN. Vachicouras et al. developed ABIs that conform to the curvature of the CN. The soft arrays could be easily handled during surgery and functioned over 1 month when implanted in mice. A scaled-up version of the conformable ABIs inserted in human cadavers showed good electromechanical and electrochemical stability and a potentially larger dynamic range compared to the clinical ABIs. These proof-of-concept results support further testing in models of deafness. Auditory brainstem implants (ABIs) provide sound awareness to deaf individuals who are not candidates for the cochlear implant. The ABI electrode array rests on the surface of the cochlear nucleus (CN) in the brainstem and delivers multichannel electrical stimulation. The complex anatomy and physiology of the CN, together with poor spatial selectivity of electrical stimulation and inherent stiffness of contemporary multichannel arrays, leads to only modest auditory outcomes among ABI users. Here, we hypothesized that a soft ABI could enhance biomechanical compatibility with the curved CN surface. We developed implantable ABIs that are compatible with surgical handling, conform to the curvature of the CN after placement, and deliver efficient electrical stimulation. The soft ABI array design relies on precise microstructuring of plastic-metal-plastic multilayers to enable mechanical compliance, patterning, and electrical function. We fabricated soft ABIs to the scale of mouse and human CN and validated them in vitro. Experiments in mice demonstrated that these implants reliably evoked auditory neural activity over 1 month in vivo. Evaluation in human cadaveric models confirmed compatibility after insertion using an endoscopic-assisted craniotomy surgery, ease of array positioning, and robustness and reliability of the soft electrodes. This neurotechnology offers an opportunity to treat deafness in patients who are not candidates for the cochlear implant, and the design and manufacturing principles are broadly applicable to implantable soft bioelectronics throughout the central and peripheral nervous system.

[1]  N. Kiang,et al.  Central trajectories of type II spiral ganglion neurons , 1988, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[2]  Daniel J. Lee,et al.  Systematic Review of Nontumor Pediatric Auditory Brainstem Implant Outcomes , 2015, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[3]  R. Shannon,et al.  Outcomes in Nontumor Adults Fitted With the Auditory Brainstem Implant: 10 Years' Experience , 2009, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[4]  Xingchao Wang,et al.  Auditory Rehabilitation in Rhesus Macaque Monkeys (Macaca mulatta) with Auditory Brainstem Implants , 2015, Chinese medical journal.

[5]  Yonggang Huang,et al.  Assembly of Advanced Materials into 3D Functional Structures by Methods Inspired by Origami and Kirigami: A Review , 2018 .

[6]  Thomas Stieglitz,et al.  Should patients with brain implants undergo MRI? , 2018, Journal of neural engineering.

[7]  Christian Bergaud,et al.  A review on mechanical considerations for chronically-implanted neural probes , 2018, Journal of neural engineering.

[8]  Giorgio Bonmassar,et al.  A Novel Brain Stimulation Technology Provides Compatibility with MRI , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[9]  A. Kratochvil,et al.  Correlations between the cerebrospinal fluid surface tension value and 1. Concentration of total proteins 2. Number of cell elements. , 2002, General physiology and biophysics.

[10]  Christopher S. Chen,et al.  High‐Conductivity Elastomeric Electronics , 2004 .

[11]  Kelsey A. Potter,et al.  Stab injury and device implantation within the brain results in inversely multiphasic neuroinflammatory and neurodegenerative responses , 2012, Journal of neural engineering.

[12]  B. Lin,et al.  Multilayer poly(vinyl alcohol)‐adsorbed coating on poly(dimethylsiloxane) microfluidic chips for biopolymer separation , 2005, Electrophoresis.

[13]  Paul B. Reverdy,et al.  Capillarity induced folding of elastic sheets , 2009 .

[14]  S. Nagarajan,et al.  Human caudate nucleus subdivisions in tinnitus modulation. , 2020, Journal of neurosurgery.

[15]  G. Clark,et al.  Human cochlear nucleus: comparison of Nissl-stained neurons from deaf and hearing patients , 1991, Brain Research.

[16]  B Kollmeier,et al.  Auditory brainstem responses with optimized chirp signals compensating basilar-membrane dispersion. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  Yong Zhu,et al.  Highly Conductive and Stretchable Silver Nanowire Conductors , 2012, Advanced materials.

[18]  Thomas Lenarz,et al.  Auditory midbrain implant: Research and development towards a second clinical trial , 2015, Hearing Research.

[19]  J. Madsen,et al.  The pulsating brain: A review of experimental and clinical studies of intracranial pulsatility , 2011, Fluids and Barriers of the CNS.

[20]  Nicholas V. Annetta,et al.  A Conformal, Bio-Interfaced Class of Silicon Electronics for Mapping Cardiac Electrophysiology , 2010, Science Translational Medicine.

[21]  Jae-Woong Jeong,et al.  Soft Materials in Neuroengineering for Hard Problems in Neuroscience , 2015, Neuron.

[22]  Leslie Y Yeo,et al.  Ultrafast Acoustofluidic Exfoliation of Stratified Crystals , 2018, Advanced materials.

[23]  W. House,et al.  Twenty-Year Report of the First Auditory Brain Stem Nucleus Implant , 2001, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[24]  Oliver Speck,et al.  T1-weighted in vivo human whole brain MRI dataset with an ultrahigh isotropic resolution of 250 μm , 2017, Scientific Data.

[25]  V. Colletti,et al.  Auditory outcomes in tumor vs. nontumor patients fitted with auditory brainstem implants. , 2006, Advances in oto-rhino-laryngology.

[26]  J. Nadol,et al.  Morphometric changes in the cochlear nucleus in patients who had undergone cochlear implantation for bilateral profound deafness 1 1 This study was supported by NIDCD grant, Electron Microscopy of the Human Inner Ear #R01DC00152-22. , 2002, Hearing Research.

[27]  Hyunsu Cho,et al.  Built‐In Haze Glass‐Fabric Reinforced Siloxane Hybrid Film for Efficient Organic Light‐Emitting Diodes (OLEDs) , 2018, Advanced Functional Materials.

[28]  G. Buzsáki,et al.  NeuroGrid: recording action potentials from the surface of the brain , 2014, Nature Neuroscience.

[29]  Robert E. MacLaren,et al.  Assessment of the Electronic Retinal Implant Alpha AMS in Restoring Vision to Blind Patients with End-Stage Retinitis Pigmentosa , 2017, Ophthalmology.

[30]  Yonggang Huang,et al.  Silicon nanomembranes for fingertip electronics , 2012, Nanotechnology.

[31]  E. Rouiller,et al.  The central projections of intracellularly labeled auditory nerve fibers in cats: an analysis of terminal morphology. , 1986, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[32]  Lorenz M. Hofmann,et al.  Modeling of a Segmented Electrode for Desynchronizing Deep Brain Stimulation , 2011, Front. Neuroeng..

[33]  Thomas Stieglitz,et al.  Improved polyimide thin-film electrodes for neural implants , 2012, 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[34]  Jeong Hun Kim,et al.  Soft implantable microelectrodes for future medicine: prosthetics, neural signal recording and neuromodulation. , 2016, Lab on a chip.

[35]  Luca Citi,et al.  Restoring Natural Sensory Feedback in Real-Time Bidirectional Hand Prostheses , 2014, Science Translational Medicine.

[36]  C. Vincent,et al.  Auditory Brainstem Implants: How Do They Work? , 2012, Anatomical record.

[37]  Robert Puers,et al.  Insulation lifetime improvement of polyimide thin film neural implants , 2015, Journal of neural engineering.

[38]  J. Golfinos,et al.  Auditory brainstem implants. , 2014, Journal of neurosurgery.

[39]  Xiaofei Yang,et al.  Polysulfide Stabilization: A Pivotal Strategy to Achieve High Energy Density Li–S Batteries with Long Cycle Life , 2018 .

[40]  Thomas Stieglitz,et al.  Thin films and microelectrode arrays for neuroprosthetics , 2012 .

[41]  A. Rivas,et al.  3D model of frequency representation in the cochlear nucleus of the CBA/J mouse , 2013, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[42]  Samuel R. Barber,et al.  Auditory Brainstem Implant Array Position Varies Widely Among Adult and Pediatric Patients and Is Associated With Perception , 2017, Ear and hearing.

[43]  John A Rogers,et al.  Recent Advances in Materials, Devices, and Systems for Neural Interfaces , 2018, Advanced materials.

[44]  Stéphanie P. Lacour,et al.  Engineering reversible elasticity in ductile and brittle thin films supported by a plastic foil , 2017 .

[45]  A. Møller,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation and extradural electrodes implanted on secondary auditory cortex for tinnitus suppression. , 2011, Journal of neurosurgery.

[46]  Oliver Speck,et al.  Erratum: T1-weighted in vivo human whole brain MRI dataset with an ultrahigh isotropic resolution of 250 μm , 2017, Scientific Data.

[47]  Z. Suo,et al.  Stretchable gold conductors on elastomeric substrates , 2003 .

[48]  Stéphanie P. Lacour,et al.  Research Update: Platinum-elastomer mesocomposite as neural electrode coating , 2015 .

[49]  M. C. Brown The antidromic compound action potential of the auditory nerve. , 1994, Journal of neurophysiology.

[50]  Nicholas J Michelson,et al.  A Materials Roadmap to Functional Neural Interface Design , 2018, Advanced functional materials.

[51]  Douglas C. Noll,et al.  Magnetic resonance compatibility of multichannel silicon microelectrode systems for neural recording and stimulation: design criteria, tests, and recommendations , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.