A Comparative Analysis of the Visual Comfort Performance between a PCM Glazing and a Conventional Selective Double Glazed Unit

The performance of a Double Glazing Unit (DGU) with a Phase Change Material (PCM) layer embedded in the cavity was analyzed in terms of the visual comfort perceived by the occupants. The analysis was carried out through a set of simulations, performed by the Radiance engine managed through Honeybee. As an input for the simulations, the visible transmittance Tv of PCM in solid (diffusing) state was used, based on previous laboratory measurements. The simulations were run for several specific times of the year: The two solstices and the autumn equinox, for different hours during the day. Other variables investigated were the site (Östersund, 63.2◦ N; Turin, 45.2◦ N; Abu Dhabi, 24.4◦ N), the room orientation (south; west), and the sky conditions (clear sky with sun; overcast). For comparative purpose, the simulations were repeated for the same boundary conditions in a room equipped with a selective glazing, with a Tv of 0.5. For each case, the visual comfort perceived by the occupants has been analyzed in terms of Daylight Glare Probability (DGP) in two different points in the room and of “Spatial Useful Illuminance” (percent of work plane points where the illuminance lies in the range 100–3000 lx). The results showed that the glazed package with PCM in most cases admits more daylight into the room, resulting into an increased glare (DGP values), but also in lower Spatial Useful Illuminance values.

[1]  Umberto Berardi,et al.  Analysis of the Impacts of Light Shelves on the Useful Daylight Illuminance in Office Buildings in Toronto , 2015 .

[2]  L. Giovannini,et al.  Phase Change Materials in Glazing: Implications on Light Distribution and Visual Comfort. Preliminary Results☆ , 2017 .

[3]  Matthias Haase,et al.  A numerical model to evaluate the thermal behaviour of PCM glazing system configurations , 2012 .

[4]  Iason Konstantzos,et al.  Experimental and simulation analysis of daylight glare probability in offices with dynamic window shades , 2015 .

[5]  Sebastian Herkel,et al.  Building simulation study of a residential double-row house with seasonal PCM-translucent façade , 2011 .

[6]  Valentina Serra,et al.  Characterization of the optical properties of a PCM glazing system , 2012 .

[7]  Francesco Goia.  Thermo-physical behaviour and energy performance assessment of PCM glazing system configurations: A numerical analysis , 2012 .

[8]  Francesco Goia,et al.  Phase Change Materials in Transparent Building Envelopes: A Strengths, Weakness, Opportunities and Threats (SWOT) Analysis , 2018 .

[9]  Dong Li,et al.  Numerical analysis on thermal performance of a PCM-filled double glazing roof , 2016 .

[10]  Valentina Serra,et al.  Improving thermal comfort conditions by means of PCM glazing systems , 2013 .

[11]  Kamal Abdel Radi Ismail,et al.  Parametric study on composite and PCM glass systems , 2002 .

[12]  Arild Gustavsen,et al.  Properties, Requirements and Possibilities of Smart Windows for Dynamic Daylight and Solar Energy Control in Buildings: A State-of-the-Art Review , 2010 .

[13]  Panayiotis A. Kyriacou,et al.  Experimental and numerical investigations of the optical and thermal aspects of a PCM-glazed unit , 2013 .

[14]  Francesco Causone,et al.  A review of indices for assessing visual comfort with a view to their use in optimization processes to support building integrated design , 2015 .

[15]  Soteris A. Kalogirou,et al.  Phase change materials (PCMs) integrated into transparent building elements: a review , 2015, Materials for Renewable and Sustainable Energy.

[16]  Francesco Goia,et al.  Dynamic Thermal Performance of a PCM Window System: Characterization Using Large Scale Measurements☆ , 2015 .

[17]  Francesco Goia,et al.  Possibilities for characterization of a PCM window system using large scale measurements , 2013 .

[18]  Rcgm Roel Loonen,et al.  Bio-inspired adaptive building skins , 2015 .

[19]  Xing Jin,et al.  Thermal analysis of PCM-filled glass windows in hot summer and cold winter area , 2016 .

[20]  Jan Wienold,et al.  Evaluation methods and development of a new glare prediction model for daylight environments with the use of CCD cameras , 2006 .

[21]  J. Fricke,et al.  PCM-facade-panel for daylighting and room heating , 2005 .

[22]  P. R. Tregenza,et al.  View and discomfort glare from windows , 2007 .

[23]  Valentina Serra,et al.  Experimental Analysis of an Advanced Dynamic Glazing Prototype Integrating PCM and Thermotropic Layers , 2014 .

[24]  Jlm Jan Hensen,et al.  Climate adaptive building shells: state-of-the-art and future challenges , 2013 .

[25]  Valentina Serra,et al.  Spectral and angular solar properties of a PCM-filled double glazing unit , 2015 .

[26]  Fariborz Haghighat,et al.  Airflow and heat transfer in double skin facades , 2011 .

[27]  J. Wienold.  DYNAMIC DAYLIGHT GLARE EVALUATION , 2009 .

[28]  F. Simone,et al.  Effect of switchable glazing on discomfort glare from windows , 2009 .

[29]  John Mardaljevic,et al.  Useful daylight illuminance: a new paradigm for assessing daylight in buildings , 2005 .

[30]  Barbara Matusiak.  Glare from a translucent facade, evaluation with an experimental method , 2013 .

[31]  Valentina Serra,et al.  Experimental analysis of the energy performance of a full-scale PCM glazing prototype , 2014 .

[32]  Valentina Serra,et al.  A Novel Concept of a Responsive Transparent Façade Module: Optimization of Energy Performance through Parametric Design , 2015 .

[33]  John Mardaljevic,et al.  Daylighting Metrics for Residential Buildings , 2011 .

[34]  G. Newsham,et al.  Windows, view, and office characteristics predict physical and psychological discomfort , 2010 .

[35]  Fernanda Rodrigues,et al.  Literature review on the use of phase change materials in glazing and shading solutions , 2016 .

[36]  Kamaruzzaman Sopian,et al.  Perspectives of double skin façade systems in buildings and energy saving , 2011 .

[37]  H. Manz,et al.  TIM–PCM external wall system for solar space heating and daylighting , 1997 .

[38]  Marilyne Andersen,et al.  Unweaving the human response in daylighting design , 2015 .