Dialogues and the problems of knowing: Reinventing the architectural competition

Summary We describe and analyze the introduction of legitimate dialogues in architectural competitions. What happens to the competition when the contestants are allowed to interact with each other and with the competition jury? We consider dialogues to be a supplementary social technology that is becoming embedded in well-known forms of architectural competitions. By enabling feedback on preliminary design ideas and solutions, the dialogues are meant to accelerate processes of clarification and learning, and to enable the contestants to implement changes and improvements during the development of their final design entries. However, in an empirical study the actual effects proved less straight-forward. The feedback allowed the architects to react and adapt, but in some cases they reacted and adapted in ways which they later regretted. By showing that feedback may also mislead the architectural teams to draw wrong implications we are sensitized to the inherent problems in knowing certain things ahead of time. We elaborate on this dilemma and suggest some implications for the theory and management of architectural competitions.

[1]  P. Drucker.  Post-Capitalist Society , 1993 .

[2]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning , 2007 .

[3]  W. Powell,et al.  Introduction: new perspectives on competition and cooperation , 2004 .

[4]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  The Structuring of Organizations , 1979 .

[5]  O. Williamson.  Transaction-Cost Economics: The Governance of Contractual Relations , 1979, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[6]  Arwin van Buuren,et al.  Program management and the creative art of coopetition: Dealing with potential tensions and synergies between spatial development projects , 2010 .

[7]  Kristian Kreiner,et al.  Tacit knowledge management: the role of artifacts , 2002, J. Knowl. Manag..

[8]  P. Lawrence,et al.  Organization and environment , 1967 .

[9]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[10]  Ken Schwaber,et al.  Agile Project Management with Scrum , 1980 .

[11]  Paul Duguid,et al.  “The Art of Knowing”: Social and Tacit Dimensions of Knowledge and the Limits of the Community of Practice , 2005, Inf. Soc..

[12]  Kristian Kreiner,et al.  Paradoxes of Architectural Competirions: The Competition Between Efficiency, Justice and Creativity , 2010 .

[13]  J. Lave.  Cognition in Practice: Outdoors: a social anthropology of cognition in practice , 1988 .

[14]  I. Nonaka,et al.  The Knowledge Creating Company , 2008 .

[15]  J. March.  The Pursuit of Organizational Intelligence , 1999 .

[16]  P. Lawrence,et al.  Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration , 1967 .

[17]  Adrian Cho,et al.  The Jazz Process: Collaboration, Innovation, and Agility , 2010 .

[18]  H. Simon,et al.  Organizations, 2nd ed. , 1993 .

[19]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  The structuring of organizations : a synthesis of the research , 1980 .

[20]  James D. Thompson.  Organizations in Action , 1967 .

[21]  野中 郁次郎,et al.  The Knowledge-Creating Company: How , 1995 .

[22]  O. Williamson,et al.  Transaction Cost Economics , 1995 .

[23]  Haridimos Tsoukas,et al.  A Dialogical Approach to the Creation of New Knowledge in Organizations , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[24]  G. Ryle,et al.  心的概念 = The concept of mind , 1962 .

[25]  A. Collins,et al.  Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning , 1989 .

[26]  Michael X Cohen,et al.  A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice. , 1972 .

[27]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[28]  K. Weick.  Making Sense of the Organization , 2000 .

[29]  W. R. Howard.  Agile Project Management: Creating Innovative Products , 2010 .

[30]  K. Knorr-Cetina,et al.  Epistemic cultures : how the sciences make knowledge , 1999 .

[31]  Paul R. Carlile,et al.  A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries: Boundary Objects in New Product Development , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[32]  Eric Lou,et al.  Proceedings 27th Annual ARCOM Conference , 2010 .

[33]  Timothy Schipper,et al.  Innovative Lean Development: How to Create, Implement and Maintain a Learning Culture Using Fast Learning Cycles , 2009 .

[34]  K. Weick.  FROM SENSEMAKING IN ORGANIZATIONS , 2021, The New Economic Sociology.