Minimum information guideline for spectrophotometric and fluorometric methods to assess biofilm formation in microplates

The lack of reproducibility of published studies is one of the major issues facing the scientific community, and the field of biofilm microbiology has been no exception. One effective strategy against this multifaceted problem is the use of minimum information guidelines. This strategy provides a guide for authors and reviewers on the necessary information that a manuscript should include for the experiments in a study to be clearly interpreted and independently reproduced. As a result of several discussions between international groups working in the area of biofilms, we present a guideline for the spectrophotometric and fluorometric assessment of biofilm formation in microplates. This guideline has been divided into 5 main sections, each presenting a comprehensive set of recommendations. The intention of the minimum information guideline is to improve the quality of scientific communication that will augment interlaboratory reproducibility in biofilm microplate assays.

[1]  Jason Barringer,et al.  Time for leadership , 2007, Nature Biotechnology.

[2]  J. Lan,et al.  Effect of a denture base acrylic resin containing silver nanoparticles on Candida albicans adhesion and biofilm formation. , 2016, Gerodontology.

[3]  Philipp Stiefel,et al.  Critical aspects of using bacterial cell viability assays with the fluorophores SYTO9 and propidium iodide , 2015, BMC Microbiology.

[4]  A. Horswill,et al.  Low Levels of β-Lactam Antibiotics Induce Extracellular DNA Release and Biofilm Formation in Staphylococcus aureus , 2012, mBio.

[5]  Anália Lourenço,et al.  BiofOmics: A Web Platform for the Systematic and Standardized Collection of High-Throughput Biofilm Data , 2012, PloS one.

[6]  R. Cruces,et al.  Comparison of the XTT and resazurin assays for quantification of the metabolic activity of Staphylococcus aureus biofilm. , 2017, Journal of microbiological methods.

[7]  L. F. Gorup,et al.  Silver colloidal nanoparticles: antifungal effect against adhered cells and biofilms of Candida albicans and Candida glabrata , 2011, Biofouling.

[8]  Anália Lourenço,et al.  Minimum information about a biofilm experiment (MIABiE): standards for reporting experiments and data on sessile microbial communities living at interfaces. , 2014, Pathogens and disease.

[9]  Thorsten Henrich,et al.  Minimum information specification for in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry experiments (MISFISHIE) , 2008, Nature Biotechnology.

[10]  Hee-Deung Park,et al.  Ginger Extract Inhibits Biofilm Formation by Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA14 , 2013, PloS one.

[11]  D. Hogan,et al.  Linking quorum sensing regulation and biofilm formation by Candida albicans. , 2011, Methods in molecular biology.

[12]  Adam S. Zeiger,et al.  Why the dish makes a difference: quantitative comparison of polystyrene culture surfaces. , 2013, Acta biomaterialia.

[13]  P. Tulkens,et al.  A Combined Pharmacodynamic Quantitative and Qualitative Model Reveals the Potent Activity of Daptomycin and Delafloxacin against Staphylococcus aureus Biofilms , 2013, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[14]  Lesley Evans Ogden,et al.  Nine years of censorship , 2016, Nature.

[15]  Eric Farrell,et al.  Selective laser melting porous metallic implants with immobilized silver nanoparticles kill and prevent biofilm formation by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. , 2017, Biomaterials.

[16]  M. Tunney,et al.  Rapid Colorimetric Assay for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa , 2004, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[17]  Asad U. Khan,et al.  International Journal of Nanomedicine , 2022 .

[18]  C. Murray,et al.  Biofilm formation by clinical isolates and the implications in chronic infections , 2013, BMC Infectious Diseases.

[19]  Dong-Shik Kim,et al.  Effects of phenol and natural phenolic compounds on biofilm formation by Pseudomonas aeruginosa , 2009, Biofouling.

[20]  M. O. Pereira,et al.  Emergent Bacteria in Cystic Fibrosis: In Vitro Biofilm Formation and Resilience under Variable Oxygen Conditions , 2014, BioMed research international.

[21]  P. Escribano,et al.  Production of biofilm by Candida and non-Candida spp. isolates causing fungemia: comparison of biomass production and metabolic activity and development of cut-off points. , 2014, International journal of medical microbiology : IJMM.

[22]  Nigel W. Hardy,et al.  Promoting coherent minimum reporting guidelines for biological and biomedical investigations: the MIBBI project , 2008, Nature Biotechnology.

[23]  Bing Li,et al.  Crystal Violet and XTT Assays on Staphylococcus aureus Biofilm Quantification , 2016, Current Microbiology.

[24]  John P. A. Ioannidis,et al.  Modelling science trustworthiness under publish or perish pressure , 2018, Royal Society Open Science.

[25]  S. Stepanović,et al.  Quantification of biofilm in microtiter plates: overview of testing conditions and practical recommendations for assessment of biofilm production by staphylococci , 2007, APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica.

[26]  Paul Stoodley,et al.  Bacterial biofilms: from the Natural environment to infectious diseases , 2004, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[27]  Nathan A. Baker,et al.  Standardizing data , 2008, Nature Cell Biology.

[29]  G. O’Toole.  Microtiter dish biofilm formation assay. , 2011, Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE.

[30]  Jianping Xu,et al.  Quantitative variation of biofilms among strains in natural populations of Candida albicans. , 2003, Microbiology.

[31]  J. Koricheva,et al.  Empowering peer reviewers with a checklist to improve transparency , 2018, Nature Ecology & Evolution.

[32]  P. Szymczyk,et al.  A.D.A.M. test (Antibiofilm Dressing's Activity Measurement) - Simple method for evaluating anti-biofilm activity of drug-saturated dressings against wound pathogens. , 2017, Journal of microbiological methods.

[33]  G. Orrù,et al.  Microtiter spectrophotometric biofilm production assay analyzed with metrological methods and uncertainty evaluation , 2012 .

[34]  Anália Lourenço,et al.  Designing an Ontology Tool for the Unification of Biofilms Data , 2014, PACBB.

[35]  A. Määttänen,et al.  Automating a 96-well microtitre plate model for Staphylococcus aureus biofilms: an approach to screening of natural antimicrobial compounds. , 2008, International journal of antimicrobial agents.

[36]  M. Vieira,et al.  Shear Stress, Temperature, and Inoculation Concentration Influence the Adhesion of Water-Stressed Helicobacter pylori to Stainless Steel 304 and Polypropylene , 2006, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[37]  T. Tolker-Nielsen,et al.  The Inoculation Method Could Impact the Outcome of Microbiological Experiments , 2017, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[38]  E. Goetghebeur,et al.  Comparison of three assays for the quantification of Candida biomass in suspension and CDC reactor grown biofilms. , 2005, Journal of microbiological methods.

[39]  P. Ježek,et al.  Influence of Dynamic Conditions on Biofilm Formation by Staphylococci , 2001, European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases.

[40]  Biju Jacob,et al.  An investigation on the antibacterial, cytotoxic, and antibiofilm efficacy of starch-stabilized silver nanoparticles. , 2012, Nanomedicine : nanotechnology, biology, and medicine.

[41]  A. Fallarero,et al.  Combining biofilm matrix measurements with biomass and viability assays in susceptibility assessments of antimicrobials against Staphylococcus aureus biofilms , 2012, The Journal of Antibiotics.

[42]  Ana Margarida Sousa,et al.  Effect of antimicrobial residues on early adhesion and biofilm formation by wild-type and benzalkonium chloride-adapted Pseudomonas aeruginosa , 2011, Biofouling.

[43]  P. Hunter.  The reproducibility “crisis” , 2017, EMBO reports.

[44]  V. Gonçalves,et al.  Crystal violet staining to quantify Candida adhesion to epithelial cells , 2010, British journal of biomedical science.

[45]  M. Soudi,et al.  Optimization of tetrazolium salt assay for Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm using microtiter plate method. , 2014, Journal of microbiological methods.

[46]  A. Bakhrouf,et al.  A microtiter plate assay for Staphylococcus aureus biofilm quantification at various pH levels and hydrogen peroxide supplementation. , 2010, The new microbiologica.

[47]  R. Durairaj,et al.  Antibiofilm properties of chemically synthesized silver nanoparticles found against Pseudomonas aeruginosa , 2014, Journal of Nanobiotechnology.

[48]  V. Garovic,et al.  Beyond Bar and Line Graphs: Time for a New Data Presentation Paradigm , 2015, PLoS biology.

[49]  U. Dirnagl.  Rethinking research reproducibility , 2018, The EMBO journal.

[50]  H. Nelis,et al.  Comparison of multiple methods for quantification of microbial biofilms grown in microtiter plates. , 2008, Journal of microbiological methods.

[51]  V. Bagnato,et al.  Susceptibility of clinical isolates of Candida to photodynamic effects of curcumin , 2011, Lasers in surgery and medicine.

[52]  Jeffrey B. Kaplan,et al.  Differential Roles of Poly-N-Acetylglucosamine Surface Polysaccharide and Extracellular DNA in Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis Biofilms , 2007, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[53]  R. Kolter,et al.  Two Genetic Loci Produce Distinct Carbohydrate-Rich Structural Components of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilm Matrix , 2004, Journal of bacteriology.