Exploring the Appeal of Product Design: A Grounded, Value‐Based Model of Key Design Elements and Relationships*

Product design is increasingly being recognized as an important source of sustainable competitive advantage. Until recently, the domain of design has been loosely categorized as “form and function” issues. However, as this paper will explore, product design deals with a much richer range of issues, many of which have not been considered in the marketing literature. To explore the domain and elements of design, the paper begins with two major goals: (1) to elicit the key dimensions of design and to develop an enriched language for the understanding and study of design; and (2) to integrate the design dimensions within a broader model that ties initial design goals to eventual psychological and behavioral responses from consumers. To achieve these ends, grounded theory development is used by conducting an extensive literature review, in-depth interviews, and an interactive object elicitation technique. Drawing from this rich source of qualitative information as well as diverse literature fields, a framework is proposed for the creation of design value in consumer products. This framework not only explores the domain of design but also highlights the important elements of design that go well beyond the cliched form and function issues. The resulting model reflects specific marketplace and organizational constraints that may help or impede the conversion of designer goals to so-called design levers. These levers are used to convey three types of values to consumers: rational, kinesthetic, and emotional. The framework then explains how and when these different values may be perceived by the consumer. Within this framework, testable research propositions and specific directions for future design-based research are also offered. Beyond its potential to spur marketing and new product development (NPD) management thought, the framework offered here represents a significant contribution to the field of design, which has historically been represented as a highly fragmented body of knowledge. Formalizing this framework should help overcome perhaps the largest obstacle to date to marketing-related and NPD-related research in this area—the lack of a detailed and consistent nomological view of the scope of design dimensions including testable linkages. Design has become an important tool that can be used by managers to develop dominant brands with lasting advantages. This research lends the NPD manager and the marketing manager better insights in into how this increasingly popular focus can be used to influence consumer behavior and firm success. “Design may be our top unexploited competitive edge.” Tom Peters, 2004 (cover review of Norman, 2004) “We don't have a good language to talk about [design]. In most people's vocabularies, design means veneer.… But to me, nothing could be further from the meaning of design. Design is the fundamental soul of a man-made creation.” Steve Jobs, Apple Computers

[1]  K. Thomas,et al.  Cognitive Elements of Empowerment: An “Interpretive” Model of Intrinsic Task Motivation , 1990 .

[2]  Russell Wayne Coff,et al.  Roadblocks to competitive advantage: how organizational constraints and individual decision biases hinder investments in strategic assets , 2001 .

[3]  Steven A. Melnyk,et al.  The new product design process and design for environment "Crossing the chasm" , 2000 .

[4]  James A. Karrh,et al.  Practitioners' evolving views on product placement effectiveness , 2003, Journal of Advertising Research.

[5]  Craig A. Smith,et al.  Patterns of cognitive appraisal in emotion. , 1985, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[6]  Felicity A. Huntingford The development of behavior , 1984 .

[7]  Berend Wierenga,et al.  Erim Report Series Research in Management the Effectiveness of Different Mechanisms for Integrating Marketing and R & D Bibliographic Data and Classifications , 2022 .

[8]  Barry Turner,et al.  Successful product design: Bill Hollins and Stuart Pugh, Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd, Guildford, 1990, £35.00 , 1991 .

[9]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT: PAST RESEARCH, PRESENT FINDINGS, AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS , 1995 .

[10]  Willman Vl,et al.  Medical device regulation. , 1978 .

[11]  J. W. Hutchinson,et al.  The Influence of Unity and Prototypicality on Aesthetic Responses to New Product Designs , 1998 .

[12]  Henry Dreyfuss,et al.  Designing for people , 1955 .

[13]  M. Holbrook Aims, Concepts, and Methods for the Representation of Individual Differences in Esthetic Responses to Design Features , 1986 .

[14]  Kevin Lane Keller Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Managing Customer-Based Brand Equity , 1993 .

[15]  E. Hirschman,et al.  Hedonic Consumption: Emerging Concepts, Methods and Propositions , 1982 .

[16]  E. Snyder,et al.  Baseball's emotion work: Getting psyched to play , 1993 .

[17]  J FISHER,et al.  The memory process and certain psychosocial attitudes, with special reference to the law of Paragnanz. I. Study of nonverbal content. , 1951, Journal of personality.

[18]  Frank Huber,et al.  The Impact of Brand Personality and Customer Satisfaction on Customer's Loyalty: Theoretical Approach and Findings of a Causal Analytical Study in the Sector of Internet Service Providers , 2003, Electron. Mark..

[19]  Priya Raghubir,et al.  Ratios in Proportion: What Should the Shape of the Package Be? , 2006 .

[20]  Hans Baumgartner An Exploratory Investigation of Holistic and Analytic Modes of Product Perception , 1993 .

[21]  A. Markman,et al.  “What Is It?” Categorization Flexibility and Consumers' Responses to Really New Products , 2001 .

[22]  D. Berlyne Novelty, complexity, and hedonic value , 1970 .

[23]  Ingvar Lundberg Zeitgeist, Ortgeist, and personalities in the development of Scandinavian psychology , 2001 .

[24]  William Lidwell,et al.  Universal Principles of Design , 2003 .

[25]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Emotional design , 2004, UBIQ.

[26]  William L. Wilkie,et al.  Issues in Marketing's use of Multi-Attribute Attitude Models , 1973 .

[27]  Fay Sweet Alessi: Art and Poetry , 1998 .

[28]  Helmut Strasser,et al.  Estimated and experienced subjective assessment of the ergonomic quality of a keyboard , 2004 .

[29]  Diane M. Mackie,et al.  The Impact of Distraction on the Processing of Category-Based and Attribute-Based Evaluations , 1990 .

[30]  Magoroh Maruyama Zeitgeist, experiential or intellectual anchorability, and popularization by metaphorization , 1998 .

[31]  Peter H. Bloch Seeking the Ideal Form: Product Design and Consumer Response: , 1995 .

[32]  Guy Julier,et al.  The culture of design , 2000 .

[33]  J. Workman,et al.  Market Orientation, Creativity, and New Product Performance in High-Technology Firms , 2004 .

[34]  Wilbert O. Galitz,et al.  The Essential Guide to User Interface Design: An Introduction to GUI Design Principles and Techniques , 1996 .

[35]  P. Clarkson,et al.  Seeing things: consumer response to the visual domain in product design , 2004 .

[36]  Jonathan M. Woodham,et al.  Icons of design! : the 20th century , 2000 .

[37]  Robert M. Schindler,et al.  Nostalgic bonding: exploring the role of nostalgia in the consumption experience , 2003 .

[38]  Kent B. Monroe,et al.  Role of Prior Affect and Sensory Cues on Consumers’ Affective and Cognitive Responses and Overall Perceptions of Quality , 1998 .

[39]  Kenneth B. Kahn Market orientation, interdepartmental integration, and product development performance , 2001 .

[40]  P. Wolff,et al.  The development of behavior in human infants, premature and newborn. , 1979, Annual review of neuroscience.

[41]  Fred M. Zimring,et al.  Cognitive simpiicify‐complexity: Evidence for disparate processes1 , 1971 .

[42]  D. Katz Gestalt Psychology: Its Nature and Significance , 1979 .

[43]  Russell Flinchum Henry Dreyfuss, Industrial Designer: The Man in the Brown Suit , 1997 .

[44]  David Pearson New Organic Architecture: The Breaking Wave , 2001 .

[45]  Grant Mccracken Culture and Consumption: A Theoretical Account of the Structure and Movement of the Cultural Meaning of Consumer Goods , 1986 .

[46]  Robert J. Aalberts,et al.  Marketing and the law , 1991 .

[47]  Aaron Oppenheimer FROM EXPERIENCE: Products Talking to People—Conversation Closes the Gap between Products and Consumers , 2005 .

[48]  Lynn A. Isabella Evolving Interpretations as a Change Unfolds: How Managers Construe Key Organizational Events , 1990 .

[49]  Charles H. Noble,et al.  Implementing Marketing Strategies: Developing and Testing a Managerial Theory , 1999 .

[50]  Joe Dolce,et al.  Product Design 3 , 1988 .

[51]  Gary Davies,et al.  The Use of Metaphor in the Exploration of the Brand Concept , 2003 .

[52]  Jin K. Han,et al.  Auditory and Visual Brand Identifiers in Chinese and English , 2002 .

[53]  Tom Peters,et al.  Marketing Aesthetics: The Strategic Management of Brands, Identity and Image , 1997 .

[54]  M. Holbrook Consumer Value: A Framework for Analysis and Research , 1999 .

[55]  Hayagreeva Rao,et al.  Overcoming Resource Constraints on Product Innovation by Recruiting Talent From Rivals: A Study of the Mutual Fund Industry, 1986–1994 , 2002 .

[56]  Robert W. Veryzer Discontinuous innovation and the new product development process , 1998 .

[57]  R. Calantone,et al.  The Impact of Market Knowledge Competence on New Product Advantage: Conceptualization and Empirical Examination , 1998 .

[58]  John Fox Managing design for a quality product , 1995 .

[59]  J. Aaker,et al.  Dimensions of Brand Personality , 1997 .

[60]  Bryan Lawson,et al.  How Designers Think , 1980 .

[61]  E. Hirschman Primitive Aspects of Consumption in Modern American Society , 1985 .

[62]  Lawrence E. Marks,et al.  Early-holistic processing or dimensional similarity? , 1993 .

[63]  Joo-Hyeon Lee Impact of traditional Korean textile designs on the aesthetic evaluation of modern consumers , 1999 .

[64]  Rachel Cooper,et al.  Characterizing the Role of Design in New Product Development: An Empirically Derived Taxonomy* , 2005 .

[65]  Jean E. Pretz,et al.  Individual differences in creativity: personality, story writing, and hobbies , 2001 .

[66]  Jeremy Myerson IDEO: Masters of Innovation , 2001 .

[67]  R. Cooper,et al.  Benchmarking the Firm's Critical Success Factors in New Product Development , 1995 .

[68]  Robert W. Veryzer Aesthetic Response and the Influence of Design Principles on Product Preferences , 1993 .

[69]  Morris B. Holbrook,et al.  Nostalgia and Consumption Preferences: Some Emerging Patterns of Consumer Tastes , 1993 .

[70]  Terry L. Childers,et al.  Individual Differences in Haptic Information Processing: The "Need for Touch" Scale , 2003 .

[71]  Marc H. Meyer,et al.  The power of product platforms : building value and cost leadership , 1997 .

[72]  Mariëlle E. H. Creusen,et al.  The Different Roles of Product Appearance in Consumer Choice , 2005 .

[73]  Joel B. Cohen,et al.  Alternative Models of Categorization: Toward a Contingent Processing Framework , 1987 .

[74]  Todd J. Arnold,et al.  Individual Differences in the Centrality of Visual Product Aesthetics: Concept and Measurement , 2003 .

[75]  W. Maisel Medical Device Regulation: An Introduction for the Practicing Physician , 2004, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[76]  Peter Dormer,et al.  The meanings of modern design : towards the twenty-first century : with 50 illusrations , 1991 .

[77]  Moreno Muffatto,et al.  Product architecture and platforms: a conceptual framework , 2002, Int. J. Technol. Manag..