(E)pistemological Awareness, Instantiation of Methods, and Uninformed Methodological Ambiguity in Qualitative Research Projects

This article explores epistemological awareness and instantiation of methods, as well as uninformed ambiguity, in qualitative methodological decision making and research reporting. The authors argue that efforts should be made to make the research process, epistemologies, values, methodological decision points, and argumentative logic open, accessible, and visible for audiences. To these ends, they discuss two ways of conceptualizing the role of epistemological awareness and instantiation of methods, including (a) a series of decision junctures and (b) a spatial conceptualization of epistemological decision making. Through an analysis of researchers’ decision junctures drawn from studies published in high-impact education journals in 2006, the authors illustrate current methodological awareness and instantiation of methods in the field of education research.

[1]  A. Pallas,et al.  Preparing Education Doctoral Students for Epistemological Diversity1 , 2001 .

[2]  C. Varcoe,et al.  Reinterpretations Across Studies: An Approach to Meta-Analysis , 2003, Qualitative health research.

[3]  George Kamberelis.  On Qualitative Inquiry: Approaches to Language and Literacy Research , 2004 .

[4]  Elizabeth Adams St. Pierre,et al.  Writing: A method of inquiry. , 1994 .

[5]  Thomas A. Schwandt.  Dictionary of qualitative inquiry , 2001 .

[6]  P. Berger,et al.  Social Construction of Reality , 1991, The SAGE International Encyclopedia of Mass Media and Society.

[7]  Pamela A. Moss,et al.  Standards for Reporting on Empirical Social Science Research in AERA Publications American Educational Research Association , 2006 .

[8]  J. A. Hatch,et al.  Doing Qualitative Research in Education Settings , 2002 .

[9]  R. Audi.  The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy , 1995 .

[10]  James Joseph Scheurich,et al.  The masks of validity: a deconstructive investigation , 1996 .

[11]  L. McIntyre.  Intentionality, Pluralism, and Redescription , 2004 .

[12]  B. Massumi,et al.  The postmodern condition : a report on knowledge , 1979 .

[13]  E. Guba.  The alternative paradigm dialog. , 1990 .

[14]  M. Wittrock.  Handbook of research on teaching , 1986 .

[15]  E. Guba,et al.  The Paradigm dialog , 1990 .

[16]  N. Denzin,et al.  Handbook of Qualitative Research , 1994 .

[17]  Lyn Richards,et al.  Readme First for a User's Guide to Qualitative Methods , 2002 .

[18]  Patti Lather.  Paradigm proliferation as a good thing to think with: teaching research in education as a wild profusion , 2006 .

[19]  J. Creswell.  Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches, 2nd ed. , 2007 .

[20]  L. Hills.  Playing the field(s): an exploration of change, conformity and conflict in girls’ understandings of gendered physicality in physical education , 2006 .

[21]  James P. Lantolf,et al.  Vygotskian Approaches to Second Language Research , 1994 .

[22]  J. Habermas.  Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action , 1990 .

[23]  David D. Williams,et al.  Reconsidering the Compatibility Thesis and Eclecticism: Five Proposed Guidelines for Method Use , 2006 .

[24]  J. Habermas,et al.  Knowledge and Human Interests , 1972 .

[25]  Elizabeth Adams St. Pierre.  Scientifically Based Research in Education: Epistemology and Ethics , 2006 .

[26]  T. Kuhn.  The structure of scientific revolutions, 3rd ed. , 1996 .

[27]  S. Hesse-Biber,et al.  Feminist Perspectives on Social Research , 2004 .

[28]  D. Caulley.  Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods , 2007 .

[29]  N. Lin.  Foundations of social research , 1976 .

[30]  M. Lecompte.  The Handbook of Qualitative Research in Education , 1993 .

[31]  N. Denzin,et al.  Introduction: The Discipline and Practice of Qualitative Research. , 2005 .

[32]  K. Roulston,et al.  Standards of Evidence in Qualitative Research: An Incitement to Discourse , 2007 .

[33]  M. Angen.  Evaluating Interpretive Inquiry: Reviewing the Validity Debate and Opening the Dialogue , 2000, Qualitative health research.

[34]  C. Moustakas.  Phenomenological Research Methods , 1994 .

[35]  D. Smith.  Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature , 1981 .

[36]  Elizabeth Adams St. Pierre.  Comment: “Science” Rejects Postmodernism , 2002 .

[37]  Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak,et al.  Outside in the Teaching Machine , 1993 .

[38]  M. Juzwik.  On Qualitative Inquiry: Approaches to Language and Literacy Research , 2005 .

[39]  E. Guba,et al.  Paradigmatic Controversies, Contradictions, and Emerging Confluences. , 2005 .

[40]  R. Bogdan.  Qualitative research for education : an introduction to theory and methods / by Robert C. Bogdan and Sari Knopp Biklen , 1997 .

[41]  S. Carter,et al.  Justifying Knowledge, Justifying Method, Taking Action: Epistemologies, Methodologies, and Methods in Qualitative Research , 2007, Qualitative health research.

[42]  Cati Coe.  Learning How to Find Out: Theories of Knowledge and Learning in Field Research , 2001 .

[43]  R. Hepburn,et al.  BEING AND TIME , 2010 .

[44]  J. Creswell.  Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five traditions. , 1998 .

[45]  Merrill B. Hintikka,et al.  Discovering Reality: Feminist Perspectives on Epistemology, Metaphysics, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science , 2006 .

[46]  P. Berger,et al.  The Social Construction of Reality , 1966 .

[47]  Chapter Fourteen. Focus Groups , 2008 .

[48]  S. Seidman,et al.  Postmodernism and Social Theory: The Debate over General Theory , 1992 .

[49]  M. Volman,et al.  Getting Smart: Feminist Research and Pedagogy with/in the Postmodern , 1994 .

[50]  N. Denzin,et al.  The Sage handbook of qualitative research, 3rd ed. , 2005 .

[51]  M. Cole,et al.  Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. L. S. Vygotsky. , 1978 .

[52]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[53]  Thomas Greckhamer,et al.  The erosion of a method: examples from grounded theory , 2005 .

[54]  James Paul Gee,et al.  话语分析入门 : 理论与方法 = An introduction to discourse analysis : theory and method , 1999 .

[55]  Patti Lather.  Getting Lost: Feminist Efforts toward a Double(d) Science , 2009 .

[56]  J. Habermas,et al.  Knowledge and Human Interests. , 1973 .

[57]  Patti Lather.  FERTILE OBSESSION: Validity After Poststructuralism , 1993 .

[58]  D. Morgan.  Focus groups for qualitative research. , 1988, Hospital guest relations report.