Group size and anti-predator strategies in a marine insect

Abstract Predator avoidance is a primary function of the flotillas of the marine insect Halobates robustus (Hemiptera: Gerridae). With fish predators whose approach is unseen by the insects, Halobates that live in groups acquire a double protection: a lower probability of attack, as a result of a simple dilution effect, and a higher probability of escape if attacked. With visible predators, such as surfacefeeding fish and birds, this protection is augmented by predator-induced avoidance behaviour, the nature of which is related to the size of the group. In large groups, the highly aroused individuals respond quickly during a predator's approach and do not disperse, but maintain a high level of confusion behaviour within the aggregation. In small groups, the individuals are not highly aroused and respond only when the predator approaches very closely, whereupon they rapidly and synchronously disperse. Predator avoidance behaviour is postulated to result from a balance between the advantages of suppressing conspicuous escape movements until the last possible moment (the small group strategy) and the advantages of early warning and conspicuous confusion behaviour (the large group strategy).

[1]  Sylvia D. Gillett,et al.  The response of predators to varying densities of Gregaria locust nymphs , 1979, Animal Behaviour.

[2]  Manfred Milinski,et al.  Optimal foraging of sticklebacks on swarming prey , 1979, Animal Behaviour.

[3]  George V. N. Powell,et al.  Experimental analysis of the social value of flocking by starlings (Sturnus vulgaris) in relation to predation and foraging , 1974 .

[4]  H. Pulliam,et al.  On the advantages of flocking. , 1973, Journal of theoretical biology.

[5]  John Lazarus,et al.  The early warning function of flocking in birds: An experimental study with captive quelea , 1979, Animal Behaviour.

[6]  P. F. Major,et al.  Predator-prey interactions in two schooling fishes, Caranx ignobilis and Stolephorus purpureus , 1978, Animal Behaviour.

[7]  M. Birch,et al.  Distribution and environmental synchronization of the marine insect, Halobates robustus, in the Galapagos Islands , 1979, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[8]  W. Foster,et al.  The effects of group size on predator avoidance in a marine insect , 1980, Animal Behaviour.

[9]  D. A. Humphries,et al.  Erratic Display as a Device against Predators , 1967, Science.

[10]  L. Underhill,et al.  Flocking as an anti-predator strategy in doves , 1975, Animal Behaviour.

[11]  W. Foster,et al.  Feeding, predation and aggregation behaviour in a marine insect, Halobates robustus Barber (Hemiptera: Gerridae), in the Galapagos Islands , 1980, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[12]  George C. Williams,et al.  Adaptation and Natural Selection , 2018 .

[13]  Robert E. Kenward,et al.  HAWKS AND DOVES: FACTORS AFFECTING SUCCESS AND SELECTION IN GOSHAWK ATTACKS ON WOODPIGEONS. , 1978 .

[14]  W. Foster,et al.  Group transmission of predator avoidance behaviour in a marine insect: The trafalgar effect , 1981, Animal Behaviour.

[15]  R. C. Miller The Significance of the Gregarious Habit , 1922 .

[16]  W. Hamilton Geometry for the selfish herd. , 1971, Journal of theoretical biology.