The Effect of Diameter Ratio and Volume Ratio on the Viscosity of Bimodal Suspensions of Polymer Latices

Previously, the rheological properties of different sized monodisperse polymer latices of polystyrene and polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) were determined. This paper describes procedures in which carefully prepared blends of the same monodisperse latices were mixed together to examine the effect of the differences in size between the latices (diameter ratio) on the rheology of the blend. The relative viscosities of these blends were then measured as a function of the total volume fraction and compared with those of the constituent parts. In a bimodal suspension, theory predicts that a maximum packing fraction and hence a minimum viscosity is achieved with 27% small particles by volume. The experiments revealed that a minimum viscosity was obtained with 25% small particles by volume and with a diameter ratio of 7.83. At this diameter ratio, the small particles are able to pass through the triangular pore between the large particles and this essentially leads to an increased maximum packing fraction of the suspension. Hence the suspension will have a lower viscosity. Other diameter ratios at 25% small particles by volume that led to suspensions with lower viscosities were 4.03, 6.37, and 11.15. On the other hand the suspensions with diameter ratios of 2.81 and 5.67 led to increases in viscosity. This is a result of the small particles being too big to fit in the gaps between the large particles. All the other diameter ratios at all the other compositions (i.e., 50 and 75% small particles by volume) resulted in viscosities higher than that obtained for the monodisperse polystyrene latex. These effects may be explained by changes in the value of the maximum packing fraction. An increased maximum packing fraction of the system leads to lower viscosities and vice versa. The results challenge the conventional view that simply increasing the diameter ratio at a fixed composition leads to reduced viscosities and increased maximum packing fractions. This simple picture does not appear to hold for binary suspensions of colloidal particles at every particle size ratios.

[1]  J. Williams,et al.  The segregation of particulate materials. A review , 1976 .

[2]  M. Z. Sengun,et al.  Bimodal model of slurry viscosity with application to coal-slurries. Part 2. High shear limit behavior , 1989 .

[3]  J. V. Sanders,et al.  Close-packed structures of spheres of two different sizes II. The packing densities of likely arrangements , 1980 .

[4]  S. Yoshimura,et al.  Optical demonstration of crystalline superstructures in binary mixtures of latex globules , 1980, Nature.

[5]  T. Tadros,et al.  Rheological Properties of Concentrated Sterically Stabilized Latex Dispersions in the Presence of Hydroxyethyl Cellulose , 1993 .

[6]  H. E. White,et al.  PARTICLE PACKING AND PARTICLE SHAPE , 1937 .

[7]  T. Tadros,et al.  Rheological studies on concentrated polystyrene latex sterically stabilized by poly(ethylene oxide) chains , 1992 .

[8]  Jodrey,et al.  Computer simulation of close random packing of equal spheres. , 1985, Physical review. A, General physics.

[9]  M. E. Ryan,et al.  Rheological Behavior of Filled Polymeric Systems II. The Effect of a Bimodal Size Distribution of Particulates , 1988 .

[10]  E. Liniger,et al.  Packing and Sintering of Two‐Dimensional Structures Made fro Bimodal Particle Size Distributions , 1987 .

[11]  J. V. Sanders.  Close-packed structures of spheres of two different sizes I. Observations on natural opal , 1980 .

[12]  H. Lekkerkerker,et al.  Phase Separation in Bimodal Dispersions of Sterically Stabilized Silica Particles , 1993 .

[13]  Paul Meakin,et al.  A mechanism for particle size segregation in three dimensions , 1990, Nature.

[14]  P. Luckham,et al.  The effect of particle size on the layer thickness of a stabilising polymer adsorbed onto two different classes of polymer latex, as determined from rheological experiments , 1995 .

[15]  C. C. Furnas.  Grading Aggregates - I. - Mathematical Relations for Beds of Broken Solids of Maximum Density , 1931 .

[16]  S. Yoshimura,et al.  ORDER FORMATION IN BINARY MIXTURES OF MONODISPERSE LATEXES , 1985 .

[17]  H. J. Fraser.  Experimental Study of the Porosity and Permeability of Clastic Sediments , 1935, The Journal of Geology.

[18]  C. Chaffey,et al.  Shear thinning and thickening rheology , 1977 .

[19]  James G. Berryman,et al.  Random close packing of hard spheres and disks , 1983 .

[20]  T. Tadros,et al.  Investigations of Depletion Flocculation of Concentrated Sterically Stabilized Latex Dispersions Using Viscoelastic Measurements and Microscopy , 1993 .

[21]  Hansen,et al.  Phase separation of asymmetric binary hard-sphere fluids. , 1991, Physical review letters.

[22]  R. Ottewill,et al.  A neutron scattering study of the structure of a bimodal colloidal crystal , 1992 .

[23]  H. Kuno,et al.  Flow of Suspensions Containing Particles of Two Different Sizes through a Capillary Tube. II. Effect of the Particle Size Ratio , 1984 .

[24]  R. Hoffman.  Discontinuous and dilatant viscosity behavior in concentrated suspensions III. Necessary conditions for their occurrence in viscometric flows , 1982 .

[25]  Paul Bartlett,et al.  Freezing of binary mixtures of colloidal hard spheres , 1990 .

[26]  Robert L. Powell,et al.  Effect of particle size distributions on the rheology of concentrated bimodal suspensions , 1994 .

[27]  A. Haymet,et al.  Freezing of polydisperse hard spheres , 1988 .

[28]  R. McGeary,et al.  Mechanical Packing of Spherical Particles , 1961 .

[29]  P. Pusey,et al.  Freezing of binary-mixtures of hard-sphere colloids , 1993 .

[30]  R. Ottewill,et al.  Geometric interactions in binary colloidal dispersions , 1992 .

[31]  Viscoelastic properties of sterically stabilized nonaqueous dispersions , 1982 .

[32]  P. Luckham,et al.  Some rheological properties of bimodal sized particulates , 1993 .

[33]  D. Frenkel,et al.  Entropy-driven formation of a superlattice in a hard-sphere binary mixture , 1993, Nature.

[34]  K. Takano,et al.  Pressure of disorder to order transition in monodisperse latex , 1982 .

[35]  Douglas Rennie Hudson,et al.  Density and Packing in an Aggregate of Mixed Spheres , 1949 .

[36]  G. J. Fleer,et al.  Polymers at Interfaces , 1993 .

[37]  C. Kruif,et al.  The viscosity of semidilute, bidisperse suspensions of hard spheres , 1993 .

[38]  P. Pusey,et al.  Phase behaviour of concentrated suspensions of nearly hard colloidal spheres , 1986, Nature.

[39]  R. Probstein,et al.  Bimodal model of slurry viscosity with application to coal-slurries. Part 1. Theory and experiment , 1989 .

[40]  E. A. Collins,et al.  Rheology of PVC dispersions. I. Effect of particle size and particle size distribution , 1979 .

[41]  G. D. Scott,et al.  Packing of Spheres: Packing of Equal Spheres , 1960, Nature.

[42]  A. E. R. Westman,et al.  THE PACKING OF PARTICLES1 , 1930 .

[43]  P. Luckham,et al.  Viscoelastic properties of polyacrylonitrile particles stabilised by a poly-2-vinylpyridine/polytert butylstyrene block copolymer , 1989 .

[44]  T. Tadros,et al.  Effect of Volume Fraction and Particle Size on Depletion Flocculation of a Sterically Stabilized Latex Dispersion Induced by Addition of Poly(ethylene oxide) , 1993 .

[45]  P. R. Sperry.  A simple quantitative model for the volume restriction flocculation of latex by water-soluble polymers , 1982 .

[46]  T. Tadros,et al.  Viscoelastic properties of aqueous concentrated pesticidal suspension concentrates , 1990 .